English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Rafale deal: Accepting Reliance was imperative and obligatory, says French report

Published

on

Rafale deal: Accepting Reliance was imperative and obligatory, says French report

On the eve of Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s visit to France and a day after Supreme Court asked Centre for details of the decision making process behind Rafale deal, a fresh storm arose over Rafale deal.

French newsportal Mediapart said it has an internal document of Dassault Aviation that says that its joint venture with Anil Ambani’s Reliance group for discharging offsets in the 36-Rafale deal was a “condition”, “imperative and obligatory” for the Rafale deal with India.

Mediapart said it had obtained an internal document which shows that Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Dassault Aviation Loïk Segalen said to his staff on May 11, 2017, during a presentation of the joint venture Dassault Reliance Aerospace Ltd (DRAL) from Nagpur: “It was imperative and obligatory for Dassault Aviation, to accept this condition, in order to obtain the export contract for Rafale from India.”

The new allegations came on a day when Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman was headed to France where she will visit a Dassault factory where the 36 Rafale aircraft are being manufactured for India. Sitharaman will also meet her French counterpart, Florence Parly. Sources say Dassault is likely to push for more Rafale jets to be bought by India during the Defence Minister’s three-day visit.

Dassault issued a denial in which it admitted the role of Loik Segalan, the Dassault manager who made the statement.

The statement read: “Within the framework of the September 2016 Inter-Government Agreement between France and India, Dassault Aviation has sold 36 Rafale aircraft to India. In compliance with the Indian regulations (Defence Procurement Procedure) and as frequent with such a contract, Dassault Aviation has committed to offsets in India worth 50 per cent of the value of the purchase.”

“In order to deliver some of these offsets, Dassault Aviation has decided to create a joint venture. Dassault Aviation has freely chosen to make a partnership with India’s Reliance Group. This joint venture, Dassault Reliance Aerospace Ltd (DRAL), was created February 10, 2017. Other partnerships have been signed with other companies such as BTSL, DEFSYS, Kinetic, Mahindra, Maini, SAMTEL. Other negotiations are ongoing with a hundred-odd other potential partners.”

“In compliance with French regulations, Chief Operating Officer Loïk Segalen informed, May 11, 2017, the Central Works Council of the creation of the DRAL joint-venture in order to fulfil some of the offsets commitment,” it added.

The previous Congress-led UPA government had negotiated with Dassault for 126 Rafale jets under which 18 jets were to be sent in a fly-away condition and 108 were to be assembled in India by HAL. However, the UPA could not seal the deal.

The new deal, announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on April 10, 2015 during his visit to Paris, led to the cancellation of the 126 aircraft deal being negotiated by the previous government and became one for purchase of 36 aircraft. The deal was signed 16 months later on September 23, 2016 in Delhi between then Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar and his French counterpart.

In this deal, Anil Ambani’s firm became Dassault’s key offset partner. As part of the offset clause, Dassault has to ensure that business worth at least half the money — Rs.30,000 crore — is generated in India. The offset obligations of the deal are to be discharged from September 2019 to September 2023, as per the contract.

Dassault has maintained that “in accordance with the policy of Make in India, Dassault Aviation has decided to make a partnership with India’s Reliance Group” and that “it is Dassault Aviation’s choice, as CEO Eric Trappier had explained in an interview”.

Segalen’s remarks back what former French President Francois Hollande, who held office when the deal for 36 Rafale aircraft was signed between India and France, had told Mediapart: “It was the Indian government that proposed this service group (Reliance), and Dassault who negotiated with Ambani. We didn’t have a choice, we took the interlocutor who was given to us.”

Hollande was responding to The Indian Express report referred to by Mediapart that Ambani’s Reliance entertainment had co-produced a French film with his partner, Julie Gayet, when India and France were negotiating the Rafale deal. “That’s why, on the other hand, this group (Reliance) did not have to give me any thanks for anything. I couldn’t even imagine that there was any connection to a film by Julie Gayet,” Hollande had said.

Hollande’s statement led to a spate of allegation and counter allegations. The opposition accused the government of ignoring the state-run defence company Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) to benefit Anil Ambani. Both the government and the industrialist have rubbished the charge.

The government had said it played “no role” and that “unnecessary controversies” were being created. Late last month, the Defence Ministry invoked “issues of conflict of interest involving persons close to the former President (Hollande)”.

The government said, “had no role in the selection of Reliance Defence as the Offset partner” and that “as per Defence Offset Guidelines, the foreign Original Equipment Manufacturer is free to select any Indian company as its offset partner”.

Ambani’s Reliance Defence became part of the offset programme of the Rs 59,000-crore Rafale deal through DRAL in which it holds a 51% stake. Dassault Aviation holds 49% stake in DRAL. In October 2017, Dassault CEO Eric Trappier had announced an investment of 100 million euros in the DRAL factory planned at Nagpur, which was scheduled to start production in 2018.

This was after Trappier and Ambani laid the foundation stone for the Nagpur factory in the presence of then French Defence Minister Florence Parly; Roads and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari; Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis and Ambassador of France to India Alexandre Ziegler.

India News

Hardeep Singh Puri dismisses E20 fuel controversy, says carmakers are comfortable with ethanol blend

Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri has rejected concerns over E20 petrol, saying the controversy is based on misreporting and that automobile manufacturers have found no problems with the ethanol-blended fuel, which has been in use across India for over a year.

Published

on

Hardeep singh puri

Union Petroleum and Natural Gas Minister Hardeep Singh Puri has rejected concerns surrounding the government’s E20 petrol programme, describing the controversy as a result of “misreporting and misinterpretation”. The minister said automobile manufacturers have not raised concerns over the use of E20 fuel and questioned why the issue has resurfaced after the blended fuel has already been in use across the country for more than a year.

The government has been expanding ethanol blending in petrol as part of its broader strategy to reduce dependence on imported crude oil, lower carbon emissions and support India’s agricultural sector. E20 petrol contains 20 per cent ethanol and has been rolled out after compatibility assessments involving vehicle manufacturers and research institutions.

Puri rejects claims over E20 fuel

Responding to criticism circulating on social media, Puri said there is no evidence to support claims that E20 petrol damages vehicle engines or creates operational problems. He noted that millions of vehicles are already running on the fuel without widespread issues being reported.

According to the minister, nearly 20 crore two-wheelers and around 20 lakh four-wheelers are using E20 fuel. He added that vehicle manufacturers as well as service professionals have consistently indicated that they have not experienced any significant difficulties with the ethanol blend.

Questioning the timing of the debate, Puri said the fuel has already been available for a considerable period, making the sudden wave of criticism difficult to understand.

Government says E20 has been in use for over a year

The minister highlighted that India had already been using E15 fuel for more than three years before transitioning to E20. He said E20 petrol has been available nationwide since April 2025, meaning it has already completed more than a year of public use.

Puri also clarified that while discussions around higher ethanol blends such as E25 continue, the government has not announced any immediate rollout. He said testing is currently underway, and any future decision will be based on scientific evaluation and consultations with stakeholders, including automobile manufacturers.

Government says future ethanol blends will undergo testing

Addressing speculation about higher ethanol blends, Puri said the government is taking a cautious approach before introducing E25 petrol. He stressed that ongoing tests will be completed first, after which the findings will be reviewed before any policy decision is taken.

The minister said discussions with automobile manufacturers and other stakeholders would be an important part of the process before moving ahead with any higher ethanol blend.

“I neither make the cars nor the fuel. The car manufacturers are comfortable with the E20 fuel. Each one of them has made a statement,” Puri said, reiterating that vehicle makers have already expressed confidence in the current fuel blend.

He also noted that the rollout of E85 fuel would take additional time as it would require supporting infrastructure, including suitable fuel dispensing facilities at petrol pumps.

Government continues to promote ethanol blending

The Centre has identified ethanol blending as a key component of its energy transition strategy. Besides reducing India’s dependence on imported crude oil, the programme is intended to cut vehicular emissions and create additional demand for agricultural produce used in ethanol production.

The government has gradually increased ethanol blending targets over the past few years while working with automobile manufacturers and research agencies to ensure vehicle compatibility with higher ethanol blends.

Puri had earlier stated that the government welcomes constructive criticism of its policies but would not accept what he described as rumours regarding biofuel blending. His latest remarks come amid renewed social media discussions claiming that E20 fuel reduces vehicle mileage or causes engine-related issues.

Reiterating the government’s position, the minister said existing data and feedback from manufacturers do not indicate widespread problems with E20 petrol, adding that any future decisions on higher ethanol blends would continue to be based on testing, scientific assessment and stakeholder consultations.

Continue Reading

India News

Congress to challenge Meenakshi Natarajan’s Rajya Sabha nomination rejection in Madhya Pradesh High Court

Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan has announced that the party will challenge the rejection of her Rajya Sabha nomination in the Madhya Pradesh High Court, alleging the decision was legally flawed and that the Election Commission failed to follow a consistent approach.

Published

on

The Congress is preparing to challenge the rejection of senior leader Meenakshi Natarajan’s Rajya Sabha nomination before the Madhya Pradesh High Court, shifting the dispute from the political arena to the legal forum.

Weeks after her nomination was rejected ahead of the Rajya Sabha elections, the former Member of Parliament asserted that the decision was not the result of any lapse by Congress leaders, legal experts or those involved in preparing the nomination papers. Instead, she claimed the rejection was based on an incorrect legal interpretation.

Congress to file election petition

Natarajan said the party would file an election petition within the prescribed time and contest the entire process before the High Court. She also alleged that a deliberate narrative was created to portray the rejection as a consequence of negligence within the Congress, thereby diverting attention from the Election Commission’s role.

According to her, the Returning Officer rejected her nomination citing non-disclosure of information related to a pending case. However, she argued that Form-26, which candidates are required to submit along with their nomination papers, does not contain any specific provision requiring disclosure of such information.

Natarajan said she has contested multiple elections in the past and maintained that experienced legal experts within the Congress have handled nomination papers for years, making such an oversight highly unlikely.

Questions raised over Election Commission’s approach

The Congress leader also questioned the Election Commission’s handling of the matter, alleging that it failed to apply uniform standards in similar cases.

She referred to the case of Rajya Sabha candidate Parimal Nathwani in Jharkhand, claiming he was given 24 hours to rectify issues in his nomination papers, whereas she was not provided a similar opportunity. According to Natarajan, the differing treatment raises concerns about consistency in the poll body’s decision-making process.

Congress sources said the party’s legal cell is preparing the election petition under the guidance of senior lawyers. The dispute had earlier reached the Election Commission and subsequently the Supreme Court, but the party will now pursue the legal remedy available after the election process through the High Court.

The Congress has also alleged that the Election Commission did not act impartially during the proceedings. Party leaders claimed senior Congress representatives and lawyers reached the poll body on time to present their arguments, but the proceedings were delayed. They further alleged that the Election Commission had the authority to overturn the Returning Officer’s decision but chose not to intervene.

BJP rejects Congress allegations

The Bharatiya Janata Party dismissed the Congress’ allegations, attributing the controversy to internal issues within the opposition party.

BJP state spokesperson Ajay Yadav said the rejection of Natarajan’s nomination was the result of internal infighting in the Congress. He also claimed that the senior leader had been sidelined within her party and suggested that the Congress should introspect instead of blaming the Election Commission.

Natarajan, however, rejected claims that the Congress was responsible for any lapse leading to the rejection of her nomination.

Continue Reading

India News

Heavy rain triggers flash floods and landslides across Jammu and Kashmir, damaging roads and property

Heavy rainfall triggered flash floods and landslides across Jammu and Kashmir, damaging infrastructure, disrupting traffic and prompting authorities to issue a weather advisory.

Published

on

Monsoon in Jammu and Kashmir

Heavy rainfall across several parts of Jammu and Kashmir triggered flash floods and landslides, causing widespread damage to roads, vehicles and residential property. The adverse weather also disrupted traffic in multiple areas, prompting authorities to advise people to remain vigilant.

Flash flood causes destruction in Doda

A flash flood struck the Thathri sub-division of Doda district after heavy overnight rainfall, leading to significant damage to homes, vehicles and other property.

Floodwaters surged through the Thathri market after water levels in local streams rose rapidly. Large quantities of mud, stones and debris entered residential areas, inundating houses and damaging parked vehicles as water flowed through roads and marketplaces.

Residents said the flooding occurred suddenly, leaving little time to respond. Officials have started assessing the damage, while restoration and relief work is underway.

Local residents alleged that debris from ongoing link road construction is frequently dumped into the Thathri stream. They claimed the accumulated material obstructs the natural flow of water, increasing the risk of flooding during heavy rainfall. Residents urged the administration to take corrective measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Doda-Kishtwar highway affected by flash floods

Continuous rainfall also triggered flash floods that damaged the Doda-Kishtwar highway, disrupting vehicular movement on the route.

Officials said floodwaters deposited large amounts of mud, boulders and debris on the highway. A portion of the road was damaged, forcing authorities to suspend traffic until conditions improve.

In neighbouring Kishtwar district, heavy rain triggered a landslide and mudslide near the tunnel area of the under-construction 540 MW Kwar Hydroelectric Power Project, adding to the weather-related disruption in the region.

Administration issues weather advisory

The administration had earlier issued an advisory warning of heavy rainfall, thunderstorms, flash floods and landslides in vulnerable areas across Jammu and Kashmir.

Authorities advised residents, particularly those living near rivers, streams and nallahs, to remain alert and avoid unsafe locations during the ongoing spell of rain.

Samba receives highest rainfall

According to the Meteorological Department, Samba recorded the highest rainfall in the Jammu region during the 24-hour period ending at 8:30 am on Monday, receiving 90 mm of rainfall.

Kathua received 66.2 mm, followed by Katra (44.4 mm), Doda (42 mm), Jammu (41.8 mm), Udhampur (40.6 mm), Bhaderwah (33.6 mm), Kishtwar (24 mm), Reasi (10.5 mm), Batote (4.7 mm), Ramban (4.5 mm) and Banihal (0.4 mm).

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com