English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Rahul Gandhi and the misfortune of attracting defamation suits

This is not the first time when Rahul Gandhi has been slapped with defamation cases. Let’s have a look.

Published

on

Rahul Gandhi

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Thursday was sentenced to 2 years in jail in connection with the 2019 defamation case over Modi surname remark. However, Gandhi was granted bail on a bail bond of Rs 15,000.

Gandhi made the remarks in question while addressing a rally at Kolar in Karnataka ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. The defamation case against Rahul Gandhi was filed by BJP MLA and former Gujarat minister Purnesh Modi who argued that the Congress leader defamed the whole Modi community.

The case against Rahul Gandhi was filed before the Surat court under Indian Penal Code (IPC) Sections 499 and 500 (dealing with defamation). The Gandhi scion recorded his statement before the court in October 2021.

The Congress leader took to Twitter and quoted Mahatma Gandhi soon after the verdict came out. He tweeted, “My religion is based on truth and non-violence. Truth is my God, non-violence is the means to get it.”

Have a look at the tweet:

Priyanka Gandhi also took to Twitter and said her brother has never been afraid, nor will he ever be. She continued that the whole machinery of the government is trying to suppress the voice of Rahul Gandhi by imposing prices, punishment, and discrimination.

This is not the first time when Rahul Gandhi has been slapped with defamation cases. Let’s have a look.

Read Also: Rahul Gandhi gets 2-year jail term for Modi surname remark, gets bail for appeal, could lose his Parliament membership

RSS defamation case

The Maharashtra court framed charges against Rahul Gandhi for allegedly making defamatory charges against the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in his 2014’s speech and blaming the RSS for Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination.

The case was registered by RSS’s Swayam Sevak Dhrutiman Joshi against Rahul Gandhi, Sitaram Yechury, Sonia Gandhi, and the Communist Party of India (Marxist) for defaming the RSS in connection with the death of Gauri Lankesh.

Joshi stated that within 24 hours of Lankesh’s murder, Gandhi criticised the RSS and alleged that anybody who speaks against the ideology of the BJP, against the ideology of the RSS is pressured, beaten, attacked and even killed.

Gandhi pleaded not guilty in the case and the court framed charges and the case was set for trial.

Chowkidar Chor Hai defamation case

In 2019, BJP leader Meenakshi Lekhi sued Rahul Gandhi for his comments a day after the Supreme Court ruled that classified documents accessed by the media could be used as evidence to consider a review in connection with its decision on the Rafale jet deal.

Welcoming the order, Gandhi had said the court agreed that chowkidar chor hai.

Following his comments, the Top Court demanded an explanation after which the Congress leader issued an unconditional apology and claimed that the remark was made unintentionally and inadvertently.

Savarkar defamation case

In 2022, Thane Police in Maharashtra registered a defamation case against Rahul Gandhi for his derogatory remarks against freedom fighter VD Savarkar. The case was filed by Vandana Dongre, a functionary of the Shiv Sena faction led by Eknath Shine who alleged that Gandhi hurt sentiments through his statements against Savarkar.

During his Bharat Jodo Yatra in Maharashtra, Gandhi, during a press conference, claimed that Savarkar helped the Britishers and wrote a mercy petition to them out of fear and betrayed Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Patel, and other leaders.

Himachal Pradesh: 4 booked for paper leak in Traffic Inspector recruitment exam

Mumbai dargah bulldozed after Raj Thackeray’s encroachment claims

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com