English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

After run-ins with CJI Dipak Misra, senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan quits legal practice

Published

on

Dipak-Misra

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Senior advocate felt humiliated at the way Chief Justice Dipak Misra treated him during the Delhi government v/s Lieutenant Governor case proceedings

Days after a five judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra concluded its hearing in the much-publicised legal battle between the Delhi government and the Lieutenant Governor, senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan stunned the legal fraternity on Monday with his decision to “give up court practice”.

Dhavan, a senior lawyer known as much for his legal expertise as for his short temper, was representing the Arvind Kejriwal-led Delhi government in the case that dealt largely with his client’s demand for a clarity on the role of the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi in the day-to-day administrative affairs of the city-state.

[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]JTNDYmxvY2txdW90ZSUyMGNsYXNzJTNEJTIydHdpdHRlci10d2VldCUyMiUyMGRhdGEtbGFuZyUzRCUyMmVuJTIyJTNFJTNDcCUyMGxhbmclM0QlMjJlbiUyMiUyMGRpciUzRCUyMmx0ciUyMiUzRVNlbmlvciUyMFN1cHJlbWUlMjBDb3VydCUyMExhd3llciUyMFJhamVldiUyMERoYXdhbiUyMHdyaXRlcyUyMHRvJTIwQ0pJJTIwRGlwYWslMjBNaXNyYSUyQyUyMHNheXMlMjAlMjYlMjMzOSUzQmFmdGVyJTIwaHVtaWxpYXRpbmclMjBlbmQlMjB0byUyMERlbGhpJTI4JTIwQ00lMjB2cyUyMExHJTIwcG93ZXIlMjB0dXNzbGUlMjklMjBjYXNlJTIwSSUyMGhhdmUlMjBkZWNpZGVkJTIwdG8lMjBnaXZlJTIwdXAlMjBjb3VydCUyMHByYWN0aWNlJTI2JTIzMzklM0IlMjAlM0NhJTIwaHJlZiUzRCUyMmh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGdC5jbyUyRnlKOEFveDNXVkYlMjIlM0VwaWMudHdpdHRlci5jb20lMkZ5SjhBb3gzV1ZGJTNDJTJGYSUzRSUzQyUyRnAlM0UlMjZtZGFzaCUzQiUyMEFOSSUyMCUyOCU0MEFOSSUyOSUyMCUzQ2ElMjBocmVmJTNEJTIyaHR0cHMlM0ElMkYlMkZ0d2l0dGVyLmNvbSUyRkFOSSUyRnN0YXR1cyUyRjk0MDEwNzYyNDAyMzkxMjQ0OCUzRnJlZl9zcmMlM0R0d3NyYyUyNTVFdGZ3JTIyJTNFRGVjZW1iZXIlMjAxMSUyQyUyMDIwMTclM0MlMkZhJTNFJTNDJTJGYmxvY2txdW90ZSUzRSUwQSUzQ3NjcmlwdCUyMGFzeW5jJTIwc3JjJTNEJTIyaHR0cHMlM0ElMkYlMkZwbGF0Zm9ybS50d2l0dGVyLmNvbSUyRndpZGdldHMuanMlMjIlMjBjaGFyc2V0JTNEJTIydXRmLTglMjIlM0UlM0MlMkZzY3JpcHQlM0U=[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]

In a curt letter to Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Dhavan said: “After the humiliating end to the Delhi case, I have decided to give up Court practice.” The legal luminary who has had an acclaimed run as a lawyer in many a high profile case over the past three decades also added that while Chief Justice Misra is “entitled to take back my Senior Gown conferred on me” he would “like to keep it for memory and services rendered.”

That Dhavan and Chief Justice Dipak Misra did not exactly see eye-to-eye on several matters in which the former was arguing in the Supreme Court was an open secret and their frequent verbal spats during court proceedings only strengthened this notion further. However, the proceedings in the Delhi government-Lieutenant Governor case on December 6 seemed to have pushed Dhavan to the edge of his patience.

As the Constitution Bench declared that it was concluding hearing in the case – a little past 4 pm on December 6 – and was reserving its verdict in the matter, there were heated exchanges between Chief Justice Dipak Misra and senior counsel Rajeev Dhavan.

Dhavan, appearing for the Delhi government, had wanted to make some oral submissions to counter contentions put forth by the Respondents in the case. After initially denying Dhavan’s request, the Chief Justice finally permitted the senior lawyer to speak but with the rider that he would not raise issues that had already been submitted by lead counsel Gopal Subramanium.

As Dhavan began his submissions related to Article 239 of the Constitution, the Chief Justice interrupted him saying “this is an uncalled for and unwanted argument”. The interruption irked Dhavan who launched into a high-pitched broadside which was reciprocated by Chief Justice telling the senior lawyer: “You go on shouting. You are always like that. We will give our judgment”.

It was only after Gopal Subramanium and Indira Jaising – Dhavan’s colleagues in the team representing the Delhi government – made desperate attempts to pacify him that the senior advocate seemed to calm down and also apologised to the Bench for his behaviour.

This was, however, not the first run in that Dhavan had with the Chief Justice in recent weeks. A day before this spat, the Chief Justice and Dhavan had got into a heated argument while the latter, along with senior lawyers Kapil Sibal and Dushyant Dave, was demanding that the Supreme Court defer the hearing in the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmbhoomi title suit till mid-2019.

Aside from his direct verbal duel with Dhavan in the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Dipak Misra had also made an indirect attack at the senior lawyer on Thursday while presiding over an unrelated case. In a veiled reference to Dhavan’s outbursts a day before, the Chief Justice had said: “When lawyers argue in a manner not in tune with constitutional language, we will tolerate it, but for how long? If the Bar does not regulate itself, we will be compelled to regulate… Unfortunately, a small group of senior counsel thinks they can raise their voices. But they must understand that raising voices will not be tolerated. Raising voices only shows their inadequacy, incompetence and that they are not fit to be seniors.”

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com