English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Sambhal Jama Masjid: Supreme Court stops trial court proceedings, directs UP govt to maintain peace

During the Friday prayer at the Masjid, UP Police kept a tight vigil using drones as people started to arrive at Sambhal’s Shahi Jama Masjid.

Published

on

The Supreme Court on Friday directed a Sambhal trial court to temporarily halt proceedings in the case over the Mughal-era Shahi Jama Masjid and its survey at Chandausi. It also directed the Uttar Pradesh government to maintain peace and harmony in the violence-hit town.

A bench consisting of Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar also instructed the local administration to take all the necessary measures to ensure peace and harmony in the region.

The Apex Court was hearing a petition filed by the Sambhal Shahi Jama Masjid Committee against a trial court direction allowing a survey of the Mosque to verify whether it was built on the ruins of a temple.

While the court clarified that it is not making any observations on the merits of the dispute, it has opted to keep the mosque committee’s petition in abeyance. The further hearing on the matter has been listed for January 6 next year. 

Meanwhile, the Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath-led Uttar Pradesh government has constituted a three-member committee to look into the matter and submit its report in the next two months. The three-member committee is headed by former Allahabad High Court judge Devendra Kumar Arora, while the other two members are former IPS officers Amit Mohan Prasad and Arvind Kumar Jain.

“We will abide by the orders of the honourable Supreme Court. We will maintain law and order in Sambhal. Orders have been given for a judicial investigation. We will take strict against all the culprits after an impartial probe,” said Uttar Pradesh Deputy CM Brajesh Pathak on the Apex Court order.

Sambhal MP Ziaur Rahman, speaking on the matter, said: “Our demand is that the commission to be constituted should be under the supervision of sitting judges of the Supreme Court and High Court. Only then can we hope for an honest investigation.”

“Death of four and injuries to several people is a serious issue. I welcome the decision of the Supreme Court. It has directed that no steps will be taken without the High Court. In a way, it has said that the lower court does not have any jurisdiction,” said Congress MP Pramod Tiwari on the Supreme Court order.

During the Friday prayer at the Masjid, UP Police kept a tight vigil using drones as people started to arrive at Sambhal’s Shahi Jama Masjid.

“Today, the Supreme Court has delivered a very significant interim order. There are three to four key points: the SC has directed the district administration to ensure peace and harmony in Sambhal. It has stayed proceedings in the suit pending before the civil judge in Sambhal until the Jama Masjid committee approaches the High Court, and the High Court decides on the challenge to the original interim order,” said Sulaiman Khan, advocate for the Muslim side.

“Today, a petition was filed before the Supreme Court. The court first emphasised maintaining peace and harmony in the area. Subsequently, the SC granted the mosque committee, which had filed the SLP, the liberty to challenge the order in the High Court. It also directed that if the petition is filed within three days, it should be listed promptly in the High Court,” said Vishnu Jain, advocate for the Hindu side.

The Hindu pursuers have claimed that the mosque was established by Mughal emperor Babar in 1526 following the demolition of a structure known as the “Harihar Temple.” On November 24, an outbreak of violence occurred in Sambhal during the execution of a survey, resulting in the fatalities of four individuals and injuries to numerous others, including police personnel.

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com