English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

SC blow to Advani, Joshi, Bharti

Published

on

SC blow to Advani, Joshi, Bharti

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Kalyan Singh will be tried, too, in the Babri demolition case, after he loses immunity as governor

By Sujit Bhar

The Supreme Court on Wednesday (April 19) struck a major legal and political blow to the entrenched old guard of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), when it ordered that leaders such as Lal Krishna Advani (who has been informally proposed to be the next President by Prime Minster Narendra Modi), Murli Manohar Joshi and Uma Bharti be brought back in the dock as accused in the 1992 (December 6) Babri Masjid demolition case.

Not only that; the top court of the country also ordered that Kalyan Singh, who was chief minister of Uttar Pradesh when the mosque was brought down by ‘kar sevaks’ and who is now Governor of Rajasthan, will enjoy immunity from prosecution only as long as he holds that post. He will also join the rest of the accused in the dock when his term as governor ends. If he completes his full term, he will be up for prosecution in late 2019.L K Advani UNI

Technically, this time period is a little over the two-year time frame that the Supreme Court has decided upon, to finish the case in a time-bound manner, with day-to-day hearings. However, those are details that remain as variables and could change with time.

The order, issued by the bench of Justices Pinaki Chandra Ghose and Rohinton Fali Nariman, also states that the two cases, now being heard in a court in Rae Bareily and another court in Lucknow, will be clubbed together and be heard in Lucknow. While the Rae Bareily court was dealing with the involvement of the said leaders, the Lucknow court was hearing petitions against “unknown” kar sevaks.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1492593690307{background-color: #e0e0e0 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1492593743241{margin-top: 10px !important;margin-right: 10px !important;margin-bottom: 10px !important;margin-left: 10px !important;border-top-width: 10px !important;border-right-width: 10px !important;border-bottom-width: 10px !important;border-left-width: 10px !important;background-color: #e0e0e0 !important;}”]SECTION 120B OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE

The application of the section depends on the reading by the courts. The punishment can finally be light, but the very act of including 120b in the chargesheet implies that even leaders of the category of Advani and others can be tried as common accused.

120B. Punishment of criminal conspiracy:

(1) Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable with death, 2[imprisonment for life] or rigorous imprisonment for a term of two years or upwards, shall, where no express provision is made in this Code for the punishment of such a conspiracy, be punished in the same manner as if he had abetted such offence.

(2) Whoever is a party to a criminal conspiracy other than a criminal conspiracy to commit an offence punishable as aforesaid shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding six months, or with fine or with both.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The enormity of the Supreme Court’s decision lies in the application, yet again, of the Indian Penal Code’s Section 120b on the leaders, which pertains to criminal conspiracy (See BOX). While a trial court had included their names in the chargesheet, the Allahabad High Court had later acquitted the leaders on technical grounds. This order of the Supreme Court, effectively nullifies that high court order.

This order of the apex court comes in reply to a CBI petition, asking for reinstatement of the leaders in the chargesheet, challenging the high court order.

Kalyan singhThe act of demolition of the 16th century mosque had resulted in widespread communal riots across the country, with hundreds killed. The CBI contends that these leaders, led by the now 89-year-old Advani, were responsible for fomenting trouble and bringing down the mosque, creating massive communal disharmony.

Here are the other parts of this historic order by the SC:

  1. No adjournment shall be given on any ground.
  2. Sessions court to complete trial within 2 years.
  3. No transfer of judge until the proceedings are completed.
  4. Day-to-day hearing.
  5. No de novo
  6. The Sessions judge can approach SC whenever it feels that the order is not complied in letter and spirit.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1492593690307{background-color: #e0e0e0 !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1492593889546{margin-top: 10px !important;margin-right: 10px !important;margin-bottom: 10px !important;margin-left: 10px !important;border-top-width: 10px !important;border-right-width: 10px !important;border-bottom-width: 10px !important;border-left-width: 10px !important;background-color: #e0e0e0 !important;}”]Will not quit: Bharti

Uma Bharti UNIThe 57-year-old Uma Bharti, Cabinet Minister for Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, who has also been brought back to the accused list in the Babri demolition case by the Supreme Court, said on April 19 that come what may she won’t resign as minister. She said she was “ready to go to jail.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Political fallout

Murli Manohar joshi UNITechnically, this will not affect the current generation of leaders of the BJP. If anything – as experts have elucidated earlier – the current dispensation will, technically, be free of the overarching presence of ideologues from the past.

The method of letting the old out to ‘vanavas’ probably resonates with the current dispensation’s thought process.  It is not sure, though, if this thought process would filter down to even newer generations within the party, with probably one day even Modi being let loose in front of Godhra riots hearings.

For the time being, though, it is a major loss of face for the BJP. It has to calibrate its response carefully to this judgement.

(Written with inputs from India Legal team)[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Delhi Police offers 11-person limit for CJP’s Connaught Place protest

Delhi Police has offered to facilitate a group of 11 people at Central Park in Connaught Place for the Cockroach Janata Party’s October 16 protest, while warning that violations of prohibitory orders could invite legal action.

Published

on

CJP protest to continue

Delhi Police has proposed allowing a group of 11 people to carry the national flag and sing the national anthem at Central Park in Connaught Place on October 16, ahead of a protest called by the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) over alleged electoral fraud.

The police said it could facilitate the group at a suitable place in the park, while appealing to the public not to join the proposed gathering in large numbers. The offer comes amid prohibitory orders in Connaught Place and adjoining areas under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).

CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke has called on people to assemble at Central Park at 5 pm on Friday with the national flag. The proposed demonstration, named “Lehra Do Tiranga”, follows the detention of CJP members Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka during an earlier protest.

Why Delhi Police proposed limiting the gathering

In its statement, Delhi Police cited the prevailing security and law-and-order situation in the area. It also referred to information from the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) that Central Park would remain closed on October 16 and 17 for administrative reasons.

Deputy Commissioner of Police Neha Yadav said the NDMC had informed the police about the closure and had asked that no gathering be allowed near the park.

The police also cited representations from trader and market associations in Connaught Place and surrounding areas. According to the police, the associations had raised concerns about unlawful assemblies and their impact on businesses, particularly during the festive season.

Police warned that violations of Section 163 BNSS would invite appropriate legal action. It also stressed that the national flag must be displayed and carried, and the national anthem sung, in the prescribed manner with due respect and dignity.

Delhi High Court declines to stop CJP protest

The proposed gathering reached the Delhi High Court after a vendor sought intervention over concerns about disruption to businesses and public movement in Connaught Place.

On Thursday, the court declined to restrain the CJP from holding the protest. It recorded the police’s assurance that all possible measures under the law would be taken to regulate the gathering and maintain peace.

The petition was filed by a vendor at Palika Bazar in Connaught Place, who raised concerns about the potential impact of the demonstration on traders and others working in the area.

Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, appearing for the authorities, told the court that steps had already been taken to regulate the proposed protest.

CJP’s protest call follows detention of party members

Dipke’s October 16 protest call follows earlier demonstrations over alleged electoral fraud. CJP members Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka are in jail on trespass charges after raising the national flag at Jantar Mantar earlier this week, according to the report.

The party has been protesting over alleged electoral fraud and has raised questions about the Election Commission.

Dipke has urged people to gather at Central Park with the national flag, arguing that raising the Tricolour should not be treated as a crime.

The police’s proposal to facilitate a group of 11 people came as the authorities sought to prevent a larger gathering at the site. The CJP’s response to the police’s offer was still awaited in the report published on October 15.

Continue Reading

India News

Actor Imran Khan asked to leave India after CJP protest

Actor Imran Khan has been asked to leave India by October 28, days after participating in a protest called by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) in Mumbai.

Published

on

Actor Imran Khan, nephew of Bollywood star Aamir Khan, has been asked to leave India by the Mumbai Police, days after participating in a protest organised by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) in Mumbai.

According to the notice, the actor has been given until October 28 to leave the country. The development follows his participation in the demonstration, which brought the actor into the spotlight over his involvement in a political protest.

Imran Khan is believed to hold US citizenship and an Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) card rather than full Indian citizenship, according to the report.

What led to the notice against Imran Khan?

The notice came days after Imran Khan joined a protest called by the CJP in Mumbai. The group, described as a satirical political organisation, had called for the demonstration.

The actor’s participation was followed by action from the authorities, with the Mumbai Police directing him to leave India by the specified deadline.

The notice does not, by itself, mean that the actor has already left the country or has been deported. October 28 is the deadline mentioned for his departure.

Imran Khan and his citizenship status

Imran Khan is known for his work in Hindi films, including Jaane Tu… Ya Jaane Na and Delhi Belly. He is also the nephew of actor Aamir Khan.

The report states that Imran Khan is believed to be a US citizen and hold an OCI card. OCI status does not confer Indian citizenship, although it provides eligible foreign citizens of Indian origin with specified privileges under Indian law.

The notice directing the actor to leave India follows his participation in the Mumbai protest. The reported development has brought attention to the intersection of immigration rules and the participation of foreign nationals in political demonstrations.

Continue Reading

India News

Election Commission orders voter roll revision in 17 states, UTs

The Election Commission has ordered a Special Summary Revision of electoral rolls in 17 states and Union Territories. Draft rolls are scheduled for November 12, with final rolls due on January 4, 2027.

Published

on

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has ordered a Special Summary Revision (SSR) of electoral rolls in 17 states and Union Territories, with the exercise aimed at facilitating voter registration and including eligible electors who may have been left out during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR).

The order was issued on Thursday, October 15, amid continuing political controversy over the SIR process and concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the exclusion of names from electoral rolls.

Under the announced schedule, January 1, 2027, will be the qualifying date for the revision. The draft electoral rolls are scheduled to be published on November 12, while the final rolls are due on January 4, 2027. Uttar Pradesh and Punjab, two states included in the exercise, are scheduled to go to the polls by February 2027.

Which states and Union Territories are covered?

The Special Summary Revision will cover the following 17 states and Union Territories:

  • Andaman and Nicobar Islands
  • Assam
  • Bihar
  • Chhattisgarh
  • Goa
  • Gujarat
  • Kerala
  • Lakshadweep
  • Madhya Pradesh
  • Manipur
  • Puducherry
  • Punjab
  • Rajasthan
  • Tamil Nadu
  • Uttar Pradesh
  • Uttarakhand
  • West Bengal

The Election Commission’s order follows earlier instructions issued to state election officials on September 29 to undertake a special drive to enrol eligible voters who had been left out, along with young and first-time electors.

Why has the Election Commission ordered the revision?

The announcement comes amid protests and political disagreements over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. Opposition parties have raised concerns about names being excluded during the exercise.

Another point of contention has been an additional declaration required from applicants submitting Form 6 for voter enrolment while the SIR was underway. The declaration required applicants to map their parents to the last SIR, which was conducted around 20 years ago.

The Election Commission had clarified on October 7 that the additional declaration applied only in states and Union Territories where the SIR was being conducted. It said the regular forms prescribed under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, would apply outside the SIR period.

The latest SSR order refers to applications for inclusion through Form 6 but does not mention the additional declaration.

What happens in states not covered by the current schedule?

The Election Commission has said that the schedule for the Special Summary Revision will be announced later in states and Union Territories where the SIR is ongoing or has recently been completed.

These include Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Chandigarh, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu, Haryana, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, the National Capital Territory of Delhi, Odisha, Sikkim, Tripura and Telangana.

For Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh, where the SIR has not yet started, the schedule for electoral roll revision will be announced in due course, taking local weather conditions into account.

The Election Commission’s latest order sets out a separate timeline for the 17 states and Union Territories covered by the current SSR exercise, while leaving the schedules for the other regions to be announced later.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com