English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

SC rejects Sasikala’s plea against conviction in DA case

Published

on

Sasikala

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The setback to the AIADMK general secretary comes at a time when her loyalists, led by nephew TTV Dhinakaran are trying to destabilise the party’s government in Tamil Nadu

In a massive setback for jailed AIADMK general secretary VK Sasikala, the Supreme Court, on Wednesday, rejected her plea for a review of her conviction to a four-year jail term in connection with a 19-year-old disproportionate assets case.

The apex court’s ruling comes at a time when Sasikala’s nephew and AIADMK deputy general secretary TTV Dhinakaran is attempting a coup of sorts against the party’s Edappadi Palaniswami-led government in Tamil Nadu.

The review petition filed by Sasikala, the late AIADMK chief J Jayalalithaa’s  foster son VN Sudhakaran and Sasikala’s sister-in-law Ilavarasi, in May this year, had challenged the apex court’s verdict which had set aside an earlier judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had acquitted the trio.

Sasikala’s lawyers had pleaded with the court that the key accused in the case, Jayalalithaa, is no more and Sasikala held no public office, the Prevention of Corruption Act doesn’t apply to her.

However, the apex court found no merit in the argument and held that there was no error in its earlier judgment.

“We do not find any error in the common judgment impugned, much less an apparent error on the face of the record, so as to call for its review. The review petitions are, accordingly, dismissed,” a two-judge Bench of Justices SA Bobde and Amitava Roy said in its verdict.

Sasikala and the other accused in the case had been convicted on February 14 on charges of amassing disproportionate assets to the tune of Rs 66.65 crore during Jayalalithaa’s first term as chief minister from 1991 to 1996.

The verdict had disqualified Sasikala from becoming a legislator, which had then ended her hopes of becoming chief minister of Tamil Nadu by ousting her rival O Panneerselvam (OPS). However, her conviction in the DA case had not stopped Sasikala and her loyalists in the AIADMK from forcing OPS to resign and paving the way for her then loyalist, Edappadi Palaniswami (EPS) to become chief minister.

The appointment of EPS had led to a three way split in the AIADMK weeks after he took over as chief minister with him leading one factions and the other two led by OPS and Sasikala’s nephew, Dhinakaran. The split had also forced the election commission to suspend the party ‘two-leaves’ poll symbol.

However, with the EPS and OPS factions having announced their merger, on Monday, the Dhinakaran faction, which has the support of 22 AIADMK MLAs, has once again begun to assert its political ambitions and calling for the resignation of Palaniswami. Sasikala’s stint in prison too has been controversial with a recent video showing her move “in and out” of Bengaluru’s Parappana Agrahara Central Prison, where she had been lodged since her conviction.

With the apex court now rejecting her review petition, AIADMK sources say that the Election Commission too could soon pass an order against her in a petition filed with it that challenges her appointment as the AIADMK general secretary after the demise of Jayalalithaa.

It now remains to be seen how Dhinakaran and the AIADMK legislators loyal to Sasikala react to the verdict and whether their rebellion against the OPS government actually manages to achieve their intended goal – installing someone (read Dhinakaran) from the Sasikala family – known in Tamil politics as the Mannargudi Mafia – in the chair of the Tamil Nadu chief minister. Or will the loyalists now switch sides to their bitter rivals – EPS and OPS.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com