English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

After several false alarms EPS and OPS announce AIADMK merger, party chief Sasikala’s fate sealed

Published

on

Palaniswami and Panneerselvam

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Once fighting for Jayalalithaa’s legacy, AIADMK (Amma) faction led by chief minister Edappadi Palaniswami and Puratchi Thalaivi Amma camp of O Panneerselvam unite, likely to convene party’s general body meet soon to expel Amma’s close-aide and jailed AIADMK general secretary VK Sasikala

Six months after he was forced to step down as chief minister of Tamil Nadu, O Panneerselvam – who had during the late AIADMK chief Jayalalithaa’s lifetime been her choice to ‘act’ as the state’s top executive on three occasions – returned as deputy chief minister of the state, to serve under Edappadi Palaniswami, who not so long ago was a minister in the OPS cabinet.

After many a twist in the AIADMK saga, the inevitable – though once unthinkable – happened on Monday. Smiling, shaking hands and hugging each other, EPS (Palaniswami) and OPS (Panneerselvam) announced the much anticipated merger of their respective AIADMK factions while their confidantes indicated that Jayalalithaa’s closest aide and jailed party general secretary Sasikala will soon be expelled from her post, and from the party.

Palaniswami, who had succeeded Panneerselvam as Tamil Nadu chief minister after Sasikala’s conviction and four-year jail term ordered by the Supreme Court earlier this year in a disproportionate assets case ensured that she could not hold the office herself, not only accepted his rival to be his deputy but also agreed to make him the ‘chief coordinator’ of the now-united AIADMK and serve as his deputy in the organisation.

“The burden in my heart is gone,” Panneerselvam said after the merger was announced, adding “none can separate us, we are all children of Amma (late Chief Minister Jayalalithaa)… We had a slight difference of opinion and have now come together in the interest of the party. The unification is in deference to the wishes of lakhs of supporters and cadres of the party.”

On part, Palaswami too made conciliatory remarks, saying: “MGR (MG Ramachandran, AIADMK founder) and Amma will be very happy today as we have both united. In six months, we suffered many problems. We will overcome.”

That the EPS and OPS factions will eventually unite had been evident for some time now. The signs had come a few months back when EPS agreed to expel Sasikala’s nephew TTV Dhinakaran from the post of AIADMK deputy secretary general. Then last week, came the clincher – EPS announced a probe into Amma’s death and that her Veda Nilayam residence in Chennai’s Poes Garden locality will be turned into a museum dedicated to her life and career.

With these announcements EPS had accepted two of Panneerselvam’s three key conditions for a merger. And on Friday evening, it was believed that the merger would be announced and Amma’s memorial at Chennai’s Marina beach had even been decked up for the grand proclamation. But then it was the third condition of the OPS faction that delayed the inevitable – his demand that Palaniswami make a public announcement of Sasikala’s ouster from the AIADMK general secretary post and from the party too.

On Monday too, the merger was almost called off when EPS continued to dither on his commitment for the third condition. But then, perhaps political expediency prevailed. EPS turned on the woman who had chosen him to succeed Panneerselvam as chief minister and threatened the AIADMK’s existence – the factional feuds had forced the Election Commission to suspend the party’s ‘two-leaves’ poll symbol – and accepted the final condition.

It is believed that the BJP and a key RSS ideologue had a role to play in convincing EPS to get OPS back into the fold. Had it not been for Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s meeting with chief ministers of all BJP-ruled states, BJP national president Amit Shah would perhaps have been in Chennai by Tuesday to even meet the united AIADMK leadership.

The Prime Minister was quick to respond to the development in the southern state in which his party has been aching to make in-roads in. Modi, of course, shared a great personal rapport with Amma and the AIADMK had on several crucial occasions come to his government’s rescue in Parliament when Opposition unity threatened to stall its legislative agenda.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Though unconfirmed as yet, the corridors of power in New Delhi are abuzz with speculation that the AIADMK may now formally join the NDA and with a cabinet reshuffle expected later this month, could even get ministerial berths in Modi’s council.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1503324759277{margin-bottom: 20px !important;border-top-width: 20px !important;padding-top: 20px !important;background-color: #a2b1bf !important;}”][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Sasikala Video grab

Sasikala ‘on the prowl’

Interestingly, the delay in the merger – which Panneerselvam had, on Saturday, indicated would happen “in a day or two” – coincides with an ‘éxpose’ carried out by The Hindu in which a video recording purportedly made at the Bengaluru’s Parappana Agrahara Central Prison showed Sasikala and her kin Ilavarasi walking into the jail carrying a bag.

The video is being used as ‘evidence’ to allege that Sasikala – who is serving a four year sentence at the jail since her conviction in a disproportionate assets case – was being given special privileges by the prison authorities and possibly was allowed to step in and out of jail too. The video footage, claims The Hindu, was submitted to the Karnataka police’s anti-corruption bureau (ACB), on Saturday, by former DIG of Prisons D Roopa, who blew the lid off the special treatment meted out to prisoners, including Sasikala, at the Agrahara Central Jail.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Meanwhile, TTV Dhinakaran – who leads a third faction of the AIADMK which continues to swear its allegiance to Sasikala despite the political turnaround in Amma’s party – has been left in the lurch. He is said to have support of at least 17 AIADMK legislators – with whom he even convened a meeting before the merger announcement – and could force a no-trust vote against the Palaniswami government if he isn’t won over.

It is perhaps the clout of Sasikala, Dhinakaran and the Mannargudi mafia (as Sasikala’s family is addressed in Tamil Nadu’s political circles) on the AIADMK cadres that forced EPS and OPS to delay the announcement of her expulsion from the party.

However, both Palaniswami and Panneerselvam are aware that a petition challenging Sasikala’s appointment as AIADMK chief is pending with the Election Commission and she could soon be in for an adverse verdict. If this happens, Palaniswami will be saved from publicly ditching Sasikala.

AIADMK sources say that the EPS and OPS camps may soon call a general council meeting of the party and announce that Amma – though no more – will continue to be named as the party’s general secretary and with the officiating bosses being the Chief Coordinator (Panneerselvam) and the newly-appointed three deputy coordinators (EPS, V Maithreyan and KP Munusamy).[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com