English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Trinamool govt slammed on social media after Tata Motors wins Singur case

A social media user remarked that the suffering of the people of West Bengal in the Singur land case is undeniable. He continued that the loss of industry, jobs and the unfavorable investment climate has had a significant impact in the state.

Published

on

Trinamool govt slammed on social media after Tata Motors wins Singur case

In a massive setback for the Trinamool government in West Bengal, Tata Motors on Monday won the Singur land dispute case. The controversy dates back to 2008 when Tata Motors, facing the then opposition led by TMC chief Mamata Banerjee, announced the withdrawal of its ambitious Nano car production plant. During that time, the CPI(M) led Left Front was in power in the state and the BJP accused the TMC of driving industries away from the state. 

Now, the social media user slammed the Trinamool government for the same after a three member Arbitral Tribunal gave an unanimous award in favour of Tata Motors to be compensated Rs 766 crore plus interest for its investment in the now-scrapped Singur plant in West Bengal. Taking to social media platform X, formerly Twitter, Dr. Indranil Khan, the state president of  Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha said that the Singur Case is not a loss to Mamata Banerjee or her party TMC. 

He added that it is the loss of the people of West Bengal as they lost industry, jobs, favorable investment climate and now a staggering 1700 crores of taxpayers money. He noted that the government of West Bengal will now pay the compensation of 765 Crore principal along with 997.97 Crore interest and 1 Crore compensation amounting to Rs 1762.97 crores not from the TMC party fund or Mamata Banerjee’s personal account, but from the taxes that have been deducted from the hard-earned money. 

He further underlined that Trinamool government got all that they sought for, Power along with all possible varieties of Corruption from coal to cattle, rich to sand in order to enrich themselves and their families. Another social media user remarked that the suffering of the people of West Bengal in the Singur Land Case is undeniable. He continued that the loss of industry, jobs and the unfavorable investment climate has had a significant impact in the state. He mentioned that the financial burden placed on the taxpayers is also a concerning aspect.

Commenting on the matter, BJP Leader Gopal Krishna Agarwal who is also an economist said that West Bengal might end up paying huge sums to Tata Motors as compensation and Singur remains a shining example of bad economic effects of cheap politics.  In addition, multiple social media users slammed that Mamata Banerjee is directly responsible for the debacle. 

https://twitter.com/Assameseguy108/status/1718999760017784897?s=20

A timeline of the Singur land dispute

In May, 2006, Ratan Tata declared the Nano car project at Singur on the day coinciding with then West Bengal chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee taking oath for the second term. Nonetheless, the project ran into trouble with farmers staging protests against forcible acquisition of land for the Tata project.

The then opposition leader Mamata Banerjee carried out an indefinite hunger strike on December 3 that year against the project. Banerjee called off her protest following appeals by then President APJ Abdul Kalam and then prime minister Dr. Manmohan Singh.

In March, 2007, Tata and the then Left government signed the Singur land deal lease. By May, the talks between the Left regime and the TMC had failed. On February 15, 2008, Tata announced the Nano roll out by October. However, on September 3, Tata suspended work and a month later, it announced that it was moving out Nano operations from West Bengal to Gujarat.

Consecutively in 2011, Mamata Banerjee-led TMC swept the state assembly election defeating the CPI (M) nearly after 34 years. After coming to power, Mamata Banerjee announced the ordinance to take back Singur land. On June 22, 2011, Tata Motors challenged the Singur Act in the Calcutta high court seeking stay on government order. The Calcutta high court denied the grant stay and Tata had moved the Supreme Court.

India News

Harivansh set to be elected Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairperson unopposed

Harivansh is set to be elected unopposed as Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman after no opposition nominations were filed before the deadline.

Published

on

Former Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman Harivansh is set to be re-elected to the same post unopposed in the election due to be held later today.
The date has been fixed by the Chairman under the relevant rules governing the conduct of business in the Upper House.
According to sources, the deadline for submitting motions for the election was 12 noon on April 16. A total of five notices were received within the stipulated time, all proposing Harivansh for the post.

Multiple nominations, single candidate
The motions were submitted by members across parties, including Jagat Prakash Nadda, Nitin Nabin, Nirmala Sitharaman, Sanjay Kumar Jha, and Jayant Chaudhary, each backed by seconding members.
All five motions explicitly state that Harivansh be chosen as the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.

No opposition nomination filed

Notably, no motion was submitted by the Opposition before the deadline. This effectively clears the path for a unanimous election, as there is no contest for the position.
As per parliamentary procedure, motions will be taken up one by one. Once any one motion is adopted by the House, the remaining motions will not be put to vote.

Likely to be elected by voice vote
In line with established practice, the first motion — expected to be moved by Nadda — may be adopted through a voice vote. Following this, the Chairman will formally declare Harivansh as elected Deputy Chairman.
After the declaration, Harivansh will be escorted to the Chair by members from both the Treasury and Opposition benches, adhering to parliamentary convention.

Continue Reading

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com