English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Supreme Court directs EC to accept Aadhaar as identity proof, clarifies it’s not citizenship evidence

Published

on

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court directed the Election Commission (EC) to consider Aadhaar as a valid identity document for the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, while making it clear that Aadhaar cannot serve as proof of citizenship.

Currently, the Bihar SIR allows voters to submit any of 11 prescribed documents along with their enumeration forms. With the Supreme Court’s order, Aadhaar will become the 12th approved document for establishing voter identity. A bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi emphasized that Aadhaar should be used strictly for identity verification, ensuring that only genuine citizens are included in the electoral rolls.

The Court instructed the EC to verify the authenticity of Aadhaar numbers submitted during the SIR and to ensure that illegal immigrants or individuals using forged documents are not included in the electoral rolls. The bench noted that only genuine citizens should be allowed to vote and directed the poll body to issue the necessary guidelines for Aadhaar’s acceptance. The Court also sought an explanation from the EC regarding the show-cause notices issued to officials who had earlier refused to accept Aadhaar as identity proof.

Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, representing the EC, argued that adding Aadhaar might serve no practical purpose, as 99.6% of the 7.24 crore voters in Bihar’s draft electoral roll had already submitted valid documents. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court referred to the Aadhaar Act, 2016, and the Representation of the People Act, reiterating that while Aadhaar does not establish citizenship, it can serve as a reliable identity verification tool.

The Court also addressed the ongoing confusion regarding Bihar’s SIR, describing it as largely a trust issue. The Court instructed the state legal services authority to engage paralegal volunteers to help voters and political parties submit their claims and objections.

According to the EC schedule issued on June 24, the deadline for filing claims and objections ended on September 1, though the poll body stated that submissions after this date would be considered only after the final electoral roll is published on September 30. Between August 22 and 30, a total of 22,723 claims for inclusion and 1,34,738 objections for exclusion were filed.

This Supreme Court directive ensures that Aadhaar can now be used as an official identity document in Bihar’s SIR, balancing efficient voter verification with protection against misuse or fraudulent entries.

India News

Parliament panel seeks Zuckerberg’s apology over PM Modi video removal, questions Meta’s accountability

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on IT has sought an apology from Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg over the temporary removal of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Facebook video, while raising concerns over accountability, algorithmic bias and safe harbour protection.

Published

on

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Information Technology has sought an apology from Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg over the temporary removal of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Facebook video, saying that a simple expression of regret would not be enough unless accountability is fixed.

The committee, chaired by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, met representatives of Meta, Google, YouTube, senior officials from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), and the Union Home Ministry to discuss issues related to social media regulation, algorithmic transparency and platform accountability.

Panel demands accountability over PM Modi video removal

During the meeting, members questioned Meta over the removal of a Facebook video in which Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed young people and promised strict action against exam paper leaks.

According to sources, committee members asked who was responsible for taking down the video and why it was removed while other objectionable content remained on the platform. Meta reportedly expressed regret over the incident and offered an apology.

However, members of the panel maintained that the matter should not end with an apology alone. They said responsibility for the lapse must be established and legal action should be considered wherever required.

The committee also questioned what safeguards ordinary Indian users have if the Prime Minister’s content could be removed in such a manner.

Nishikant Dubey warns over safe harbour protection

Speaking after the meeting, Nishikant Dubey said Mark Zuckerberg should personally apologise for the incident.

He also warned that if such an apology is not forthcoming, Meta’s “safe harbour” protection could come under scrutiny. Safe harbour provisions protect online platforms from liability for third-party content, provided they comply with due diligence requirements under Indian law.

Dubey further claimed that the Prime Minister’s video remained unavailable for around five hours and described the matter as serious.

Panel raises concerns over algorithms and child safety

Apart from the video controversy, the committee also questioned Meta over alleged algorithmic bias and the way content is promoted on social media platforms.

Dubey said the committee unanimously discussed concerns regarding algorithm-driven reach and claimed that newer or unregistered groups were receiving greater visibility than recognised political parties. He said understanding how platforms determine content reach was important for the country.

The meeting also included discussions on child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and the responsibilities of social media companies in preventing such content from appearing on their platforms.

MeitY had earlier questioned Meta’s explanation

Last week, MeitY had summoned Meta’s global team over issues related to algorithmic bias, platform processes and their potential impact on public order.

Meta had attributed the temporary removal of the Prime Minister’s video to a technical glitch. However, according to sources, the ministry considered the explanation inadequate.

Separately, Hyderabad Cyber Crime Police have registered cases against Meta India head Arun Srinivas and certain Facebook and Instagram accounts over allegedly morphed and AI-generated posts targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Continue Reading

India News

Prashant Kishor wins Bankipur bypoll, secures first electoral victory in BJP bastion

Prashant Kishor won the Bankipur Assembly bypoll in Bihar by defeating BJP candidate Neeraj Kumar by 19,324 votes. The victory marks Kishor’s first electoral success and Jan Suraaj’s maiden Assembly seat.

Published

on

Jan Suraaj chief Prashant Kishore

Jan Suraaj Party (JSP) founder Prashant Kishor has registered his maiden electoral victory by winning the Bankipur Assembly bypoll in Bihar, ending the BJP’s long dominance in the constituency. The former election strategist defeated BJP candidate Neeraj Kumar by a margin of 19,324 votes, marking the first Assembly seat won by both Kishor and his party.

According to Election Commission data, Kishor secured 64,151 votes, while Neeraj Kumar polled 44,827 votes. Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) candidate Rekha Kumari finished third with 14,273 votes.

Prashant Kishor promises visible changes in Bankipur

After the victory, Prashant Kishor thanked the voters and assured them that development work would begin immediately.

Addressing reporters, he said people would witness visible changes in Bankipur within three months and requested residents to give him that time. He also said his office would remain open not only for the people of Bankipur but for everyone in Bihar.

Kishor described the victory as significant, saying his party had managed to end what he called the BJP’s three-decade hold over the constituency in just 30 days of campaigning.

Says Bihar voters have sent a message to BJP

Speaking after the results, Kishor said the people of Bihar had conveyed a message to the BJP’s central leadership that the state needed a chief minister focused on improving education and creating employment opportunities. He also said voters wanted leadership with a clean public image.

Bihar Chief Minister congratulates Kishor

Bihar Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary congratulated Prashant Kishor on his victory through a post on X.

He said the people had chosen Jan Suraaj in the Bankipur Assembly by-election and extended his congratulations while respecting the democratic verdict.

Why the Bankipur bypoll drew national attention

The Bankipur by-election attracted national attention for several reasons. The constituency has long been considered a BJP stronghold and was represented for multiple terms by senior BJP leader Nitin Nabin, who vacated the seat after moving to the Rajya Sabha.

The contest also gained prominence after Prashant Kishor entered the fray and came in the backdrop of nationwide student protests centred around education-related issues. Political observers had closely watched whether young voters would influence the outcome in the urban Patna constituency.

The BJP also witnessed a last-minute change in candidate after Abhishek Kumar Sinha withdrew before filing his nomination, following which the party fielded youth wing leader Neeraj Kumar. The RJD nominated Rekha Kumari.

Jan Suraaj opens its electoral account

The victory marks a milestone for the Jan Suraaj Party, which had failed to win any seats in the 2025 Bihar Assembly election. Kishor himself had not contested that election.

With the Bankipur result, Jan Suraaj has opened its electoral account, while Kishor has entered the Bihar Assembly for the first time.

Reacting to the outcome, Jan Suraaj’s Bihar chief Manoj Bharti said the people of Bankipur had voted for change. He claimed the party received support across different sections of society and thanked what he described as the party’s “silent voters” for helping secure the victory.

Continue Reading

India News

Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh acquitted in women wrestlers’ sexual harassment case

A Delhi court has acquitted former BJP MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and former WFI official Vinod Tomar in the sexual harassment case filed by six women wrestlers.

Published

on

Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh

Former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP and former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh was acquitted on Monday by a Delhi court in the sexual harassment case filed by six women wrestlers.

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) Ashwini Panwar of the Rouse Avenue Courts delivered the verdict. Co-accused Vinod Tomar, former Assistant Secretary of the WFI, was also acquitted in the case.

As media personnel were not allowed inside the courtroom, Singh’s lawyers described the verdict as an “honourable acquittal.”

Case was based on complaints by six women wrestlers

The case stemmed from allegations of sexual harassment made by six women wrestlers against Singh. Acting on their complaints, the Delhi Police registered a First Information Report (FIR).

On June 15, 2023, the police filed a chargesheet against Singh under Sections 354 (outraging a woman’s modesty), 354A (sexual harassment), 354D (stalking) and 506(1) (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Court had framed charges in 2024

On May 10, 2024, the trial court framed charges against Singh for alleged sexual harassment and outraging the modesty of five women wrestlers, observing that there was sufficient material on record to proceed with the trial.

The court had also framed charges under Section 506(1) of the IPC in relation to allegations of criminal intimidation involving two wrestlers.

Vinod Tomar was charged with criminal intimidation over allegations that he had threatened one of the complainants.

POCSO case had already been closed

A separate case under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act had also been registered after a minor wrestler levelled allegations against Singh. However, the minor later withdrew her complaint, following which the Delhi Police filed a cancellation report. The POCSO case was subsequently closed.

Advocates Rajiv Mohan, Rishabh Bhati, Rehan Khan and Suryansh Singh appeared for Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh during the proceedings.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com