English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Supreme Court notice to Modi govt on plea against amendment to corruption law

Published

on

SUPREME-COURT

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The Supreme Court today (Monday, Nov 26) issued notice to Narendra Modi government on a plea challenging constitutional validity of amendments made to the Prevention of Corruption Act in July this year making it difficult for probe agencies to expeditiously act on complaints of graft against serving and retired bureaucrats.

The amendment to the anti-graft law mandates prior sanction before starting a probe against a serving or retired government servant in a corruption case.

The Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Ajay Rastogi was hearing a petition filed by the Center for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL).

The petition seeks a review of Section 17A of the PC Act which mandates that the still-to-be-formed Lokpal at the Centre and the Lokayuktas in States will have powers to approve initiation of inquiries against all serving and retired bureaucrats upon receipt of any complaint of graft against them. The Centre has been asked to respond to the notice within six weeks.

The Centre notified amendments to the PC Act on July 26 this year. The amended anti-graft law introduced stringent penalties for bribe givers and bribe seekers once their culpability in the act was proven but, on the other hand it made the investigative process more cumbersome.

Many anti-graft crusaders had, at the time of the passage of the amended legislation, mocked the law as one that should be called Protection (and not Prevention) of Corruption Act”.

The provision of prior sanction also introduces an element of government discretion and preference in choosing which official should be proceeded against and who should be spared.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1543225561723{border-top-width: 10px !important;border-right-width: 10px !important;border-bottom-width: 10px !important;border-left-width: 10px !important;padding-top: 10px !important;padding-right: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;padding-left: 10px !important;background-color: #cecece !important;border-radius: 10px !important;}”]The amended Section 17A of the Act reads thus:

“(1) No police officer shall conduct any enquiry or inquiry or investigation into any offence alleged to have been committed by a public servant under this Act, where the alleged offence is relatable to any recommendation made or decision taken by such public servant in discharge of his official functions or duties, without the previous approval —

(a) in the case of a person who is or was employed, at the time when the offence was alleged to have been committed, in connection with the affairs of the Union, of that Government;

(b) in the case of a person who is or was employed, at the time when the offence was alleged to have been committed, in connection with the affairs of a State, of that Government;

(c) in the case of any other person, of the authority competent to remove him from his office, at the time when the offence was alleged to have been committed:

Provided that no such approval shall be necessary for cases involving arrest of a person on the spot on the charge of accepting or attempting to accept any undue advantage for himself or for any other person:

Provided further that the concerned authority shall convey its decision under this section within a period of three months, which may, for reasons to be recorded in writing by such authority, be extended by a further period of one month.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Critics of the amended Act claim that Section-17A “violates of Article-14, 19 and Article-21 of the Constitution of India” and that it also takes away or abridge the fundamental rights of complainants of fair investigation as well as equality before the law.

The Modi government, on the other hand, has maintained that the amended legislation serves as a strong deterrent against corruption while it also safeguards conscientious bureaucrats against motivated complaints.

Votaries of the amended Act state that it had increased the punishment for those found guilty of offering a bribe from the previous mandated jail term of six months to three years to a more stringent “up to seven years imprisonment”. The amended law also provides for a sentence of “between five to 10 years” for repeat offenders. It also stipulates that investigation and trial against government employees alleged of crimes under that Act must be completed within two years – and if this condition is not met then a maximum extension of another two years may be granted.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Hardeep Singh Puri dismisses E20 fuel controversy, says carmakers are comfortable with ethanol blend

Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri has rejected concerns over E20 petrol, saying the controversy is based on misreporting and that automobile manufacturers have found no problems with the ethanol-blended fuel, which has been in use across India for over a year.

Published

on

Hardeep singh puri

Union Petroleum and Natural Gas Minister Hardeep Singh Puri has rejected concerns surrounding the government’s E20 petrol programme, describing the controversy as a result of “misreporting and misinterpretation”. The minister said automobile manufacturers have not raised concerns over the use of E20 fuel and questioned why the issue has resurfaced after the blended fuel has already been in use across the country for more than a year.

The government has been expanding ethanol blending in petrol as part of its broader strategy to reduce dependence on imported crude oil, lower carbon emissions and support India’s agricultural sector. E20 petrol contains 20 per cent ethanol and has been rolled out after compatibility assessments involving vehicle manufacturers and research institutions.

Puri rejects claims over E20 fuel

Responding to criticism circulating on social media, Puri said there is no evidence to support claims that E20 petrol damages vehicle engines or creates operational problems. He noted that millions of vehicles are already running on the fuel without widespread issues being reported.

According to the minister, nearly 20 crore two-wheelers and around 20 lakh four-wheelers are using E20 fuel. He added that vehicle manufacturers as well as service professionals have consistently indicated that they have not experienced any significant difficulties with the ethanol blend.

Questioning the timing of the debate, Puri said the fuel has already been available for a considerable period, making the sudden wave of criticism difficult to understand.

Government says E20 has been in use for over a year

The minister highlighted that India had already been using E15 fuel for more than three years before transitioning to E20. He said E20 petrol has been available nationwide since April 2025, meaning it has already completed more than a year of public use.

Puri also clarified that while discussions around higher ethanol blends such as E25 continue, the government has not announced any immediate rollout. He said testing is currently underway, and any future decision will be based on scientific evaluation and consultations with stakeholders, including automobile manufacturers.

Government says future ethanol blends will undergo testing

Addressing speculation about higher ethanol blends, Puri said the government is taking a cautious approach before introducing E25 petrol. He stressed that ongoing tests will be completed first, after which the findings will be reviewed before any policy decision is taken.

The minister said discussions with automobile manufacturers and other stakeholders would be an important part of the process before moving ahead with any higher ethanol blend.

“I neither make the cars nor the fuel. The car manufacturers are comfortable with the E20 fuel. Each one of them has made a statement,” Puri said, reiterating that vehicle makers have already expressed confidence in the current fuel blend.

He also noted that the rollout of E85 fuel would take additional time as it would require supporting infrastructure, including suitable fuel dispensing facilities at petrol pumps.

Government continues to promote ethanol blending

The Centre has identified ethanol blending as a key component of its energy transition strategy. Besides reducing India’s dependence on imported crude oil, the programme is intended to cut vehicular emissions and create additional demand for agricultural produce used in ethanol production.

The government has gradually increased ethanol blending targets over the past few years while working with automobile manufacturers and research agencies to ensure vehicle compatibility with higher ethanol blends.

Puri had earlier stated that the government welcomes constructive criticism of its policies but would not accept what he described as rumours regarding biofuel blending. His latest remarks come amid renewed social media discussions claiming that E20 fuel reduces vehicle mileage or causes engine-related issues.

Reiterating the government’s position, the minister said existing data and feedback from manufacturers do not indicate widespread problems with E20 petrol, adding that any future decisions on higher ethanol blends would continue to be based on testing, scientific assessment and stakeholder consultations.

Continue Reading

India News

Congress to challenge Meenakshi Natarajan’s Rajya Sabha nomination rejection in Madhya Pradesh High Court

Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan has announced that the party will challenge the rejection of her Rajya Sabha nomination in the Madhya Pradesh High Court, alleging the decision was legally flawed and that the Election Commission failed to follow a consistent approach.

Published

on

The Congress is preparing to challenge the rejection of senior leader Meenakshi Natarajan’s Rajya Sabha nomination before the Madhya Pradesh High Court, shifting the dispute from the political arena to the legal forum.

Weeks after her nomination was rejected ahead of the Rajya Sabha elections, the former Member of Parliament asserted that the decision was not the result of any lapse by Congress leaders, legal experts or those involved in preparing the nomination papers. Instead, she claimed the rejection was based on an incorrect legal interpretation.

Congress to file election petition

Natarajan said the party would file an election petition within the prescribed time and contest the entire process before the High Court. She also alleged that a deliberate narrative was created to portray the rejection as a consequence of negligence within the Congress, thereby diverting attention from the Election Commission’s role.

According to her, the Returning Officer rejected her nomination citing non-disclosure of information related to a pending case. However, she argued that Form-26, which candidates are required to submit along with their nomination papers, does not contain any specific provision requiring disclosure of such information.

Natarajan said she has contested multiple elections in the past and maintained that experienced legal experts within the Congress have handled nomination papers for years, making such an oversight highly unlikely.

Questions raised over Election Commission’s approach

The Congress leader also questioned the Election Commission’s handling of the matter, alleging that it failed to apply uniform standards in similar cases.

She referred to the case of Rajya Sabha candidate Parimal Nathwani in Jharkhand, claiming he was given 24 hours to rectify issues in his nomination papers, whereas she was not provided a similar opportunity. According to Natarajan, the differing treatment raises concerns about consistency in the poll body’s decision-making process.

Congress sources said the party’s legal cell is preparing the election petition under the guidance of senior lawyers. The dispute had earlier reached the Election Commission and subsequently the Supreme Court, but the party will now pursue the legal remedy available after the election process through the High Court.

The Congress has also alleged that the Election Commission did not act impartially during the proceedings. Party leaders claimed senior Congress representatives and lawyers reached the poll body on time to present their arguments, but the proceedings were delayed. They further alleged that the Election Commission had the authority to overturn the Returning Officer’s decision but chose not to intervene.

BJP rejects Congress allegations

The Bharatiya Janata Party dismissed the Congress’ allegations, attributing the controversy to internal issues within the opposition party.

BJP state spokesperson Ajay Yadav said the rejection of Natarajan’s nomination was the result of internal infighting in the Congress. He also claimed that the senior leader had been sidelined within her party and suggested that the Congress should introspect instead of blaming the Election Commission.

Natarajan, however, rejected claims that the Congress was responsible for any lapse leading to the rejection of her nomination.

Continue Reading

India News

Heavy rain triggers flash floods and landslides across Jammu and Kashmir, damaging roads and property

Heavy rainfall triggered flash floods and landslides across Jammu and Kashmir, damaging infrastructure, disrupting traffic and prompting authorities to issue a weather advisory.

Published

on

Monsoon in Jammu and Kashmir

Heavy rainfall across several parts of Jammu and Kashmir triggered flash floods and landslides, causing widespread damage to roads, vehicles and residential property. The adverse weather also disrupted traffic in multiple areas, prompting authorities to advise people to remain vigilant.

Flash flood causes destruction in Doda

A flash flood struck the Thathri sub-division of Doda district after heavy overnight rainfall, leading to significant damage to homes, vehicles and other property.

Floodwaters surged through the Thathri market after water levels in local streams rose rapidly. Large quantities of mud, stones and debris entered residential areas, inundating houses and damaging parked vehicles as water flowed through roads and marketplaces.

Residents said the flooding occurred suddenly, leaving little time to respond. Officials have started assessing the damage, while restoration and relief work is underway.

Local residents alleged that debris from ongoing link road construction is frequently dumped into the Thathri stream. They claimed the accumulated material obstructs the natural flow of water, increasing the risk of flooding during heavy rainfall. Residents urged the administration to take corrective measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Doda-Kishtwar highway affected by flash floods

Continuous rainfall also triggered flash floods that damaged the Doda-Kishtwar highway, disrupting vehicular movement on the route.

Officials said floodwaters deposited large amounts of mud, boulders and debris on the highway. A portion of the road was damaged, forcing authorities to suspend traffic until conditions improve.

In neighbouring Kishtwar district, heavy rain triggered a landslide and mudslide near the tunnel area of the under-construction 540 MW Kwar Hydroelectric Power Project, adding to the weather-related disruption in the region.

Administration issues weather advisory

The administration had earlier issued an advisory warning of heavy rainfall, thunderstorms, flash floods and landslides in vulnerable areas across Jammu and Kashmir.

Authorities advised residents, particularly those living near rivers, streams and nallahs, to remain alert and avoid unsafe locations during the ongoing spell of rain.

Samba receives highest rainfall

According to the Meteorological Department, Samba recorded the highest rainfall in the Jammu region during the 24-hour period ending at 8:30 am on Monday, receiving 90 mm of rainfall.

Kathua received 66.2 mm, followed by Katra (44.4 mm), Doda (42 mm), Jammu (41.8 mm), Udhampur (40.6 mm), Bhaderwah (33.6 mm), Kishtwar (24 mm), Reasi (10.5 mm), Batote (4.7 mm), Ramban (4.5 mm) and Banihal (0.4 mm).

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com