English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

US urge Security Council to punish Iran for malign behaviour

Published

on

US urge Security Council to punish Iran for malign behaviour

Iran’s leader Ayatollah Khemenei denounce Western states

Confrontation between US and Iran continues unabatedly. Wednesday witnessed United States administration urging UN Security Council members to punish Iran for “malign behaviour”, while Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei denounced the “Western states” for their pretence of advocating human rights.

According to AFP, Jonathan Cohen, the US deputy ambassador to UN said, “When confronted with a country that continually violates this council’s resolutions, it is imperative that we pursue meaningful consequences. That is why we urge members of this Council to join us in the imposition of sanctions that target Iran’s malign behaviour in the region.”

Cohen once again accused Iran of supplying missiles to the Houthi militias in Yemen in violation of an international arms embargo.

US urge Security Council to punish Iran for malign behaviour

The is the first UNSC meeting after US President Donald Trump announced withdrawal from multilateral Iran nuclear deal, known as JCPOA, signed between Iran and P5+1 (five permanent Security Council members plus Germany).

On May 24, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed Iran’s compliance of the agreement for the eleventh time.

Read More: Sushma meets Mogherini, discuss bilateral ties, Iran deal

In the ongoing war initiated by Saudi-led coalition against Yemen has turned severe recently when a fresh aggression to remove Houthi armed forces from Hudaidah. In recent months Houthi Ansarullah armed forces have been hitting several targets in Saudi Arabia by missiles. Saudi Arabia, US and their regional allies have been alleging Iran for supplying the missiles.

Saudi Arabia’s official Al-Arabiya reports that recently the United Nations said that missile components fired at Saudi Arabia had been manufactured in Iran, but world body’s officials were unable to determine if they had been delivered before or after the July 2016 imposition of an arms embargo on Yemen.

US urge Security Council to punish Iran for malign behaviour

According to Press TV, while addressing judiciary officials on Wednesday in Tehran, Ayatollah Khamenei made reference to human rights violations committed by the US in various parts of the world as well as France and Britain’s crimes of the past decades which took place in Africa and Indian subcontinent.

Iranian leader reiterated that the West’s support over the past years for the Daesh (IS) terror group in Syria and the atrocities being committed in Myanmar and elsewhere “is indicative of the repeated lies of the shameless fake human rights advocates.”

Read More: India to continue trade with Iran despite US sanctions threat

All permanent UN Security Council members, except US, have been supporting Iran nuclear deal while Israel and Saudi Arabia have been supporting Trump’s decision to withdrawal from the multilateral nuclear agreement. Recently European Union and Iran have been in discussion for finding ways to continue their trade and investment activities despite US sanctions.

US has on Tuesday warned nations to stop buying Iranian oil before November 4, the deadline to impose sanctions.

Read More: US asks nations to stop Iranian oil import by Nov.4 or face sanctions

India has been assuring Iran for continuing the purchase of their oil and trade in other areas. Minister of External Affairs Sushma Swaraj has recently said that India honour UN sanctions and not specific country’s assertions. Union Minister Nitin Gadkari has also recently said in Dushanbe, the capital of Tajikistan that India was trying to make the strategic Chabahar port in Iran by 2019.

Read More: India sends first wheat shipment for Afghanistan via Iranian Chabahar port

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com