English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Who will be India’s next Vice President? BJP vs INDIA bloc showdown as voting begins

India votes today to elect a new Vice President after Jagdeep Dhankhar’s sudden resignation. BJP has fielded Maharashtra Governor CP Radhakrishnan, while the INDIA bloc backs retired Supreme Court judge Justice B. Sudershan Reddy. Voting runs till 5 pm with results expected by nightfall

Published

on

India is set to welcome a new Vice President by nightfall on September 9, with a direct contest underway between the ruling BJP-led NDA and the opposition INDIA bloc. The election was necessitated by the sudden resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar, who stepped down citing ill health, though sources suggest his decision followed disagreements with the government over an opposition-backed impeachment motion against a Delhi High Court judge.

The Contestants

The BJP has nominated CP Radhakrishnan, the current Governor of Maharashtra and a senior leader from Tamil Nadu. His selection is being seen as a strategic signal ahead of the assembly elections in his home state next year.

Challenging him is the INDIA bloc’s candidate, Justice B. Sudershan Reddy, a retired Supreme Court judge best known for his 2011 ruling against the state-backed Salwa Judum militia in Chhattisgarh. That verdict has drawn sharp criticism from the BJP, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah accusing Justice Reddy of having “helped Naxalism.”

How the Voting Works

Voting began at 10 am and will continue until 5 pm, after which counting is scheduled to start around 6 pm. Members of Parliament, whether elected or nominated, cast their vote in a secret ballot—though in practice, party lines and political strategies often influence the outcome.

The ruling NDA currently commands 427 MPs across both Houses, comfortably above the 386-vote majority mark, even without factoring in confirmed support from the YSR Congress Party. The opposition INDIA bloc, on the other hand, has around 315 votes and limited prospects of bridging the gap, even if all 12 AAP MPs back Justice Reddy.

BJP’s Man-to-Man Strategy

Despite its numerical advantage, the BJP is leaving nothing to chance. Sources say the party has deployed a “man-to-man marking” system, grouping MPs under senior Union ministers to prevent last-minute poaching or absenteeism.

  • Pralhad Joshi is managing southern MPs,
  • Piyush Goyal is overseeing those from Uttar Pradesh,
  • Shivraj Singh Chouhan, ML Khattar, and Arjun Meghwal are among others tasked with ensuring full attendance.

Opposition’s Optics Game

For the INDIA bloc, this election is less about victory and more about political optics. By forcing a contest, the alliance aims to:

  • Project stronger numbers than the last vice-presidential election in 2022,
  • Showcase opposition unity,
  • Build momentum for critical state elections in Bihar, Bengal, and Tamil Nadu.

However, internal challenges remain. Within the AAP, Rajya Sabha MP Swati Maliwal—embroiled in a past clash with party chief Arvind Kejriwal—could break ranks, though her vote alone is unlikely to alter the outcome.

What Lies Ahead

The result will be clear tonight. While CP Radhakrishnan remains the clear frontrunner, given the NDA’s comfortable strength in Parliament, the INDIA bloc is betting on the battle itself to keep its political narrative alive.

The new Vice President will step into office against the backdrop of a turbulent Monsoon session, following Dhankhar’s dramatic exit, and at a time when the road to the 2026 Tamil Nadu assembly polls is already shaping national strategies.

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com