English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

“We want an early resolution of Ayodhya dispute”

Published

on

mudda

Panellists feel that the issue is hanging fire for too long and parties should not misuse it for electoral advantage

The Supreme Court said it will decide in January the date for hearing the Ayodhya land dispute case. In less than three minutes, the court adjourned till next year the hearing of a batch of pleas challenging the Allahabad High Court’s 2010 verdict that divided into three parts the disputed land in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid area in Ayodhya.

APN’s Mudda discussed the issue. Anchorperson Anant Tyagi posed questions to panellists including BJP’s Dinesh Singh, Congress’ Saif Ali, Hindu Mahasabha’s Swami Chakrapani Maharaj, Muslim scholars Ajmal Khan and Maulana Abid, RSS’s Sarvesh Chandra Dwivedi and APN consultant Govind Pant Raju.

Singh said: “For some reason, the Supreme Court has put off the decision. Let’s see what happens, we can’t keep sidelining it. We wanted an early resolution.”

Swami Chakrapani said: “It is sad that despite repeated pleas to the government and agencies, the issue has been put off again and again. BJP leaders say ‘it should be done’. Why are they failing on their agenda? What is the point of BJP getting such a huge majority? It’s a challenge to the protesters now.”

When Anant asked “don’t you trust the SC?”, Swami Chakrapani said: “We want judgment, not settlement, so that there is no dispute on the issue. BJP got a good decisive vote, but its moves are not decisive.”

Maluana Abid said: “Court judges decide as per what they deem fit. This Mudda has been raging on for decades. Earlier with Vajpayee and now with Modi, nothing decisive has emerged even with a BJP government at the centre. Are they expecting the court to be at the beck and call of political parties?”

To this, Singh said:”We have never said that we don’t trust the SC. Ram is of Hindustan, the verdict has to be favourable.”

Maulana Abid said:”It’s a title suit. Why are you bringing in Ram or Babar? When the matter is with the highest court of the country, we shall all have to abide by the verdict.”

When Singh continued to interject, he was silenced by the anchor.

Saif Khan said: “There is a lot the SC needs to know, a lot more research and comments are needed to be heard. People need to know that there is no love lost on this issue. The government has a Rs 500 crore budget for Ayodhya. How has that been used?”

Ajmal Khan said: “We can’t understand why the SC adjourned the case. We can only respect the verdict. There cannot be a debate on the SC adjournment.”

Raju said: “People expected the SC to decide once and for all. It’s unfortunate that the matter was adjourned in three minutes. The court did not deem the matter urgent enough. It could have given an earlier date. In reality, a lot more time is needed to arrive at a conclusion on this issue. The Ram Mandir mudda is a political issue, raised by political parties; faith is a different matter altogether. The SC case has nothing to do with faith. It’s a site dispute.”

Singh said: “Don’t allege that BJP is raking up this issue for political votes before the upcoming elections. Mudda is created by the people, not the parties.”

Swami Chakrapani said: “The BJP got a massive mandate to sort out this issue. But it is still hanging fire. The central government is equally vague about gau maaas (beef). They need to be clearer in their intentions and their actions.”

Said Khan said: “Whatever the SC verdict, we respect it. It is just a poll issue. BJP is not serious about devolving a solution to this at all.”

Maulana Abid said: “In 70 years, Muslims have suffered a lot. Images have been slipped in the dark of the night into the place. Let the SC decide the truth.”

Sarvesh Dwivedi said: “Whoever is raking up this issue should wait for the SC verdict now. However, the issue could have been decided amicably by all parties.”

                                                                                    —Compiled by Niti Singh Bhandari

India News

Drunk speeding Audi crushes pedestrians in Jaipur, one killed and 15 injured

A late-night crash involving a drunk speeding Audi in Jaipur left one pedestrian dead and at least 15 others injured after the car ran over roadside vendors and pedestrians.

Published

on

car accident

One person was killed and at least 15 others were injured after a speeding Audi car, allegedly driven by drunk occupants, ran over pedestrians and roadside vendors in Rajasthan’s Jaipur late Friday night.

According to the police, the luxury car lost control and first hit a road divider before ploughing into food carts and roadside stalls over a stretch of nearly 30 metres. The vehicle eventually crashed into a tree and came to a halt, damaging several parked vehicles along the way.

Visuals from the scene showed shattered food carts scattered across the road, while the Audi was left completely mangled due to the impact.

A total of 16 people were hit in the incident and were rushed to a nearby hospital. Four of the injured were reported to be in critical condition and were later referred to Sawai Man Singh (SMS) Hospital for advanced treatment.

One of the injured, identified as Ramesh Bairwa, a resident of Bhilwara, succumbed to his injuries during treatment.

Police officials said that four people were inside the car at the time of the crash, and all of them were allegedly under the influence of alcohol. While one person has been arrested, three others fled the spot after the incident.

The driver of the Audi has been identified as Dinesh Ranwan, a resident of Churu district in Rajasthan. The vehicle has been seized, and a search is underway to trace the remaining accused.

Rajasthan Chief Minister Bhajanlal Sharma expressed grief over the incident and instructed officials to ensure proper medical care for the injured. Deputy Chief Minister Premchand Bairwa and Health Minister Gajendra Singh Khimsar visited the hospital to enquire about the condition of those injured.

Continue Reading

India News

Mamata Banerjee says ED raids on I-PAC have politically rejuvenated her

Mamata Banerjee led a protest rally in Kolkata after ED raids linked to I-PAC, saying political attacks only rejuvenate her and accusing the Centre of misusing agencies.

Published

on

mamta banerjee

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Friday escalated her confrontation with the Centre following Enforcement Directorate (ED) raids linked to the Indian Political Action Committee (I-PAC), asserting that political attacks only strengthen her resolve.

Banerjee led a nearly 6-kilometre protest rally in Kolkata, beginning from Jadavpur and ending at Hazra, with senior Trinamool Congress leaders and party workers marching alongside her. Large crowds gathered along the route in a show of support.

Addressing party supporters after the rally, the Trinamool Congress chairperson defended her decision to enter the residence of I-PAC co-founder Pratik Jain during the ED raids on Thursday, an act that has drawn criticism from the Bharatiya Janata Party and prompted demands for an investigation.

“I did nothing illegal. I went there as the Trinamool Congress chairperson,” Banerjee said, adding that several items had already been taken away by the time she reached the premises.

Allegations of misuse of central agencies

The chief minister accused the Centre of using agencies such as the ED and the Central Bureau of Investigation for political purposes. Questioning the intent behind the raids, she said political opponents were attempting to weaken her party ahead of the 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections.

“If someone tries to kill me politically, don’t I have the right to defend myself?” she asked.

The ED action against I-PAC is linked to an alleged coal scam. Banerjee claimed that leaders from the BJP were also involved in coal-related irregularities and asserted that she possessed evidence. “I have proof on pen drives. I will release it when the time comes,” she said.

‘Politically rejuvenated and reborn’

Taking a combative tone, Banerjee said repeated attempts to target her had only made her stronger politically. “If someone tries to hit me politically, I get politically rejuvenated and reborn,” she declared.

Referring to recent political developments in other states, she alleged that central agencies had been used to destabilise elected governments elsewhere, adding that similar attempts would fail in West Bengal. She expressed confidence that the Trinamool Congress would secure a decisive mandate in the 2026 Assembly polls.

BJP hits back

The BJP accused the West Bengal government of corruption and claimed that the chief minister’s actions during the ED raids raised serious questions. Party leaders alleged that Banerjee had intimidated officials and demanded that she be made an accused in the case.

The political confrontation comes hours after several Trinamool Congress MPs, including Derek O’Brien and Mahua Moitra, were detained by Delhi Police while protesting outside Union Home Minister Amit Shah’s office. Banerjee criticised the detentions, describing the ruling party’s approach to democracy as one that demands “obedience”.

Continue Reading

India News

Ayodhya bans online delivery of non-veg food within 15 km of Ram temple

Ayodhya authorities have prohibited online delivery of non-vegetarian food within 15 km of the Ram temple following complaints over violations in sacred areas.

Published

on

Ram Mandir

The Ayodhya district administration has imposed a ban on the online delivery of non-vegetarian food items within a 15-kilometre radius of the Ram temple, following repeated complaints about violations in religiously significant areas.

Officials said the decision was taken after residents and pilgrims raised concerns over online food delivery platforms supplying non-vegetarian items in locations falling under the Panchkosi Parikrama route, considered sacred by devotees.

Complaints against hotels and online platforms

Authorities also flagged reports suggesting that certain hotels and homestays in Ayodhya were serving non-vegetarian food and alcoholic beverages to guests, despite restrictions. Establishments have been issued strict warnings to immediately stop such practices, officials said.

The ban comes months after the Ayodhya Municipal Corporation decided in May 2025 to prohibit the sale of liquor and meat along the 14-km Ram Path, which connects Ayodhya with Faizabad. However, locals claim that liquor sales continue along the route, with more than two dozen outlets still operating.

A municipal officer said meat shops along the Ram Path, including those in Faizabad, had been removed. However, action against liquor vends requires authorisation from the district administration, leading to delays in enforcement.

Monitoring to ensure compliance

Assistant Food Commissioner Manik Chandra Singh said complaints had surfaced that non-vegetarian food continued to be delivered to tourists through online platforms despite existing restrictions.

“Following these complaints, a ban on online non-vegetarian food delivery has been imposed. Hotels, shopkeepers and delivery companies have been informed, and continuous monitoring will be conducted to ensure compliance,” Singh said.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com