English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Why is centre making farm ponds and training masons?

Published

on

FM Arun Jaitley with the Budget papers before presenting them in parliament on Feb 1 (photo: Arun Jaitley); the Budget has set a target of additional five lakh farm ponds in rural areas in 2017-2018.

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]New Delhi-directed and monitored rural sector spending in the era of economic liberalisation

Parsa Venkateshwar Rao Jr

One of the curious facts contained in Finance Minister Arun Jaitley’s 2017-18 Budget speech in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday is exceeding the target in making farm ponds. Jaitley in the speech had said: “The target of five lakh farm ponds and 10 lakh compost pits announced in the last Budget from MNGREGA funds will be fully achieved. In fact, against the five lakh farm ponds, it is expected that about 10 lakh farm ponds would be completed by March 2017. During 2017-18, another five lakh farm ponds will be taken up. This single measure will contribute greatly to drought proofing of gram panchayats.”

It might appear cynical to point a finger when the government not only meets the target but exceeds the target as well. What seems to emerge from this fact about the creation of farm ponds is that the money is being spent from the rural employment guarantee scheme of MGNREGA, which can be claimed is a good thing. It cannot be disputed. But the curious issue is who is taking the decision on making farm ponds? Is it the decision of the gram panchayat? Does it feel that it is what the village needs? Or is it a gratuitous way of keeping people employed under the MGNREGA scheme? The classic version is that of digging holes and filling them up in times of economic depression. In 2004, in the first UPA-I Budget, the then finance minister P Chidambaram talked about renewing water bodies in the villages.

It would appear that the imperious central government wants to be seen working at grassroot levels, a sort of micro-management when it is a well known fact that agriculture is a state subject, and decisions with regarding to agriculture should be made at the local level. There can also be a debate on whether farm ponds are part of an irrigation source or safe drinking water source. Or is part of the much-touted water-harvesting?

It is a well known fact that from ancient times, digging up tanks in villages has been an established practice for purposes of drinking water as well as irrigation. But should that decision be left to the panchayats? Why is the central government taking up the responsibility of digging farm ponds? It is, of course, a good deed. But the central government should be doing bigger things and leave small issues to the local authorities to sort out. Remember that farm ponds by their very nature are not permanent structures. They are in need of constant upkeep.

The other curious detail in the finance minister’s Budget speech with regard to spending in the rural sector is the training of masons. While announcing an increase in the allocation of Rs 4,500 crore in 2017-18 under the Deen Dayal Antyodaya Yojana-National Rural Livelihood Mission for promotion of skill development and livelihood opportunities for people in rural areas, the minister said: “Mason training will be provided to 5 lakh persons by 2022” and the immediate target is of turning out 20,000 masons in 2017-18.

There is no doubt that the country needs trained masons and other skilled workers. But that issue needs to be addressed at various levels and the central government should not be involved in it, and it should not be part of the aims of the Union Budget. Why is there so much of involvement on the part of the government? Of course, socialists and other do-gooders are sure to hail the work of the NDA government with regard to farm ponds and masons. It only proves that the right-wing BJP does not have a mind of its own with regard to its economic philosophy. It shows that this is not the party of economic reforms and of less governmental interference in the economic activities and the lives of the people in the country. This government wants to prop up the economy and be seen to be doing it. The farm ponds-and-masons story says it all.

Lead picture: FM Arun Jaitley with the Budget papers before presenting them in parliament on Feb 1 (photo: Arun Jaitley); the Budget has set a target of additional five lakh farm ponds in rural areas in 2017-2018.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Supreme Court judge calls police assault on CJP protesters very distressing

Supreme Court judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan criticised alleged police assaults on CJP protesters and raised concerns over excessive force.

Published

on

Supreme Court

Supreme Court judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan has criticised the assault of protesters by police personnel during the recent CJP demonstrations in Delhi, describing the conduct as “very, very distressing” and a matter of serious concern.

Speaking at the launch of retired IPS officer Yashovardhan Azad’s book Policing the Republic, Justice Bhuyan said the detachment expected from police officers appeared to be diminishing.

He expressed concern over young Indian Police Service officers personally participating in the assault of protesters and demonstrators.

Justice Bhuyan stresses need for responsible policing

Justice Bhuyan said effective policing does not require excessive use of force or infringement of human rights. He emphasised that the police play an important role in maintaining public confidence because citizens generally approach the police when they feel they have been wronged.

He said maintaining the credibility of the police force was therefore of “utmost importance”.

The judge’s remarks come amid continuing scrutiny of the police and paramilitary response to the CJP protests in Delhi.

Supreme Court panel to examine police action

The Supreme Court has constituted a high-level panel to investigate allegations concerning the use of force by Delhi Police during the July 20 student protests at Jantar Mantar and the subsequent Parliament march.

The panel, headed by former Supreme Court judge Justice R Subhash Reddy, will examine complaints relating to lathi charges, tear gas, pellet guns and electronic batons. It will also look into allegations of targeted harassment or molestation of female protesters and review available CCTV and video footage.

The police response during the protests has faced criticism, while Delhi Police has maintained that its personnel were also attacked during the clashes.

Judge raises concern over custodial deaths and torture

Justice Bhuyan also spoke about custodial torture and deaths, describing custodial death as one of the gravest crimes in a society governed by the rule of law.

He stressed that torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment cannot be accepted, regardless of whether such conduct takes place during investigation, interrogation or other circumstances.

The judge further warned that when government functionaries themselves become lawbreakers, it can undermine respect for the law and encourage lawlessness.

He questioned whether citizens lose their fundamental rights simply because they have been arrested by police.

‘Fake encounters’ cannot be part of policing

Justice Bhuyan also addressed allegations of extra-judicial killings, commonly referred to as “fake encounters”. Referring to a 2011 Supreme Court judgment, he said such encounters undermine the rule of law.

He stressed that an “encounter philosophy” cannot become part of legitimate policing and said proven fake encounters involving serving police officers must be treated with the utmost seriousness.

The Supreme Court’s panel will now examine the allegations surrounding the police action during the July 20 protests as scrutiny of the events continues.

Continue Reading

India News

8 Tamil Nadu engineering students killed in Kerala car-lorry crash

Eight engineering students from Tamil Nadu were killed after their car collided with a parked lorry on NH-66 in Kerala’s Thrissur district.

Published

on

Eight engineering students from Tamil Nadu were killed after the car they were travelling in crashed into a parked lorry on NH-66 in Kerala’s Thrissur district late Friday night, police said.

The accident took place at around 11.40 pm at Panambikkunnu in Kaipamangalam. The students were travelling from Guruvayur towards Kodungallur when their car collided with the rear of the lorry.

What happened in the Thrissur accident

According to the FIR, the lorry was parked illegally on the right side of the highway near a barricaded section where traffic had been diverted because of ongoing construction work.

Police said the car was travelling at high speed and its driver apparently failed to notice the diversion barricade before the vehicle crashed into the rear of the lorry.

The lorry was registered in Maharashtra.

Six students died at the accident spot, while two others were declared dead on arrival at a nearby hospital, police said.

Six victims identified

The victims were students of an engineering college in Dindigul and were travelling towards Kodungallur along NH-66.

Police have identified six of the eight victims. Four of them — Surya, Yuvasanjith, Vishva and Johua — were from Dindigul. The other two identified victims were Santhosh and Prasanna from Madurai.

The identities of the remaining two students are yet to be confirmed.

Residents, fire and rescue personnel and police took part in the rescue operation and pulled the students from the badly damaged car. The bodies were subsequently taken to the mortuary of Thrissur Medical College.

Case registered against lorry driver

Kaipamangalam police have registered a case against the lorry driver under Section 105 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for culpable homicide.

Police said the driver went into hiding shortly after the accident.

The families of the victims were contacted using student identity cards recovered from the bodies. Police said some families were unaware that their children had travelled to Kerala.

Postmortem examinations will begin after the families reach Thrissur Medical College, police said.

Continue Reading

India News

Air India sacks Phuket-Delhi flight pilot after failing drug test

Air India has terminated the Phuket-Delhi flight pilot after a confirmatory test found a psychoactive substance following the August 4 incident.

Published

on

Air India has terminated the employment of the pilot-in-command of a Phuket-Delhi flight after he tested positive for a psychoactive substance.

The pilot was in command of flight AI2379, which was travelling from Phuket to Delhi on August 4 when the aircraft suddenly lost altitude over Odisha. The incident left 24 passengers injured.

Air India said the termination was in line with its zero-tolerance policy regarding safety violations and regulatory requirements.

Air India terminates pilot with immediate effect

In a statement, the Tata-owned airline said the pilot-in-command had tested positive for a psychoactive substance.

The airline said that, considering its zero-tolerance approach to violations related to safety, fitness and regulatory requirements, the pilot’s employment had been terminated with immediate effect.

Air India also said it continues to cooperate fully with the investigation into the incident and has provided access to relevant operational, maintenance and technical records.

What happened on the Phuket-Delhi flight?

According to the preliminary findings of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), the Airbus A320 was carrying 145 people when it experienced the near-simultaneous loss of all three hydraulic systems while cruising at around 36,000 feet.

The technical failure resulted in the autopilot disconnecting and triggered a brief stall warning. The aircraft subsequently lost altitude, resulting in injuries to 24 passengers.

The preliminary report also noted that the pilot tested non-negative for a psychoactive substance in a confirmatory test.

However, the report did not establish that the pilot’s drug-test result caused or contributed to the hydraulic system failure or the subsequent loss of altitude.

AAIB recommends action over psychoactive substance finding

The AAIB described the confirmation of psychoactive substance use as a serious concern and recommended that the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) take appropriate action against the pilot on priority.

The investigation into the technical and other aspects of the incident is still underway.

The preliminary report also noted that the co-pilot was flying the aircraft when the incident occurred and attempted to bring the situation under control.

Air India said safety remains its highest priority and that its pilots undergo training, proficiency checks, medical examinations and other regulatory assessments in accordance with applicable requirements.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com