The Maharashtra Cyber agency has filed a case against at least four editors of Wikipedia for failing to remove “objectionable” content related to Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj, the son of Maratha empire founder Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. Officials confirmed the action on Friday, citing concerns over the potential for the content to incite unrest in the state.
The Maharashtra Cyber agency had previously issued a notice to the California-based Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that hosts Wikipedia, requesting the removal of the contentious content. The notice highlighted that the information posted on Wikipedia was inaccurate and could provoke a law-and-order situation, given the deep reverence for Sambhaji Maharaj in India.
Despite the notice, the Wikimedia Foundation did not respond or take down the content, prompting the agency to register a case under relevant sections of the Information Technology (IT) Act. Wikipedia, a free online encyclopedia, relies on a community of volunteer editors who contribute and manage its content.
The issue gained prominence following the release of the Hindi film Chhaava, a biographical work based on the life of Sambhaji Maharaj. The film, which has received positive reviews and strong box office performance, has sparked renewed interest in the historical figure.
Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis took serious note of the matter on February 18, directing the state cyber police to intervene.
“I have asked the Inspector General of Maharashtra Cyber Cell to communicate with Wikipedia officials and request the removal of objectionable content and references against Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj. We will not tolerate distortions or write-ups on open-source platforms that jeopardize our historical facts. I have ordered officials to take all necessary steps,” Fadnavis stated during a press conference in Mumbai.
The Chief Minister acknowledged the challenges posed by Wikipedia’s global operation and volunteer-driven editorial model. “Wikipedia does not operate from India, and it is managed by volunteers who edit content and have editorial rights. We can request them to implement certain regulations to prevent such distortions of historical facts,” he added.
The controversy underscores the growing tension between the need for open access to information and the protection of cultural and historical sensitivities. As Maharashtra authorities pursue legal action, the case highlights the complexities of regulating content on global platforms while respecting local sentiments.