English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Justice Yashwant Varma sworn in as Allahabad High Court judge amid in-house probe

In a letter dated April 5 addressed to Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court Arun Bhansali, HCBA Secretary Vikrant Pandey condemned the move, arguing that it further eroded public trust in the judicial system.

Published

on

In a move that has added to controversy, Justice Yashwant Varma was sworn in as a judge of the Allahabad High Court on Saturday, despite an ongoing in-house inquiry ordered by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna on March 22.

The inquiry, conducted by a panel of three High Court judges, was initiated to investigate serious allegations against Justice Varma following the discovery of large amounts of cash at his official residence in Delhi.

The controversy began on March 14 when a fire broke out at Justice Varma’s residence on Tughlak Road at 11:35 p.m. The Delhi Fire Services (DFS) swiftly controlled the blaze, but during the response, first responders reportedly found several semi-burnt sacks containing Indian currency notes in a storeroom.

At the time, Justice Varma, then a judge at the Delhi High Court, and his wife were in Bhopal. The shocking discovery raised questions about the source and purpose of the cash, triggering a storm of speculation and calls for accountability.

Justice Varma has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, labelling the allegations as a “conspiracy to malign” him, according to reports. However, the incident has cast a shadow over his judicial career, prompting the CJI to order a probe to uphold the integrity of the judiciary.

Despite the ongoing investigation, Justice Varma’s swearing-in ceremony at the Allahabad High Court was conducted on Saturday in what the High Court Bar Association (HCBA) described as a “clandestine” manner.

The lawyers’ body, which had previously opposed his repatriation to Allahabad, expressed outrage, questioning why the event was not publicly notified to the Bar.

In a letter dated April 5 addressed to Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court Arun Bhansali, HCBA Secretary Vikrant Pandey condemned the move, arguing that it further eroded public trust in the judicial system.

“The entire Bar Association is pained to learn about the secretive way in which Justice Yashwant Varma was administered the oath of office at Allahabad,” Pandey wrote.

He recalled that the CJI had assured Bar members during a meeting that steps would be taken to maintain the dignity of the judiciary. “We were told the process would be fair and transparent, but why was this oath not communicated to the Bar? This question once again shakes people’s faith in the system,” he added.

Pandey urged the Chief Justice not to assign any administrative or judicial duties to Justice Varma, asserting that “legally and traditionally, the oath administered to him is flawed and unacceptable.”

He emphasized that the swearing-in of a judge is a cornerstone event in the judicial system and should be conducted openly, with lawyers—whom he described as equal stakeholders—being informed and involved. “Keeping the lawyer fraternity in the dark may undermine their confidence in this institution,” he warned.

The HCBA passed a resolution declaring the oath “unconstitutional” and distanced itself from the process, arguing that it violated established norms. “We spoke openly about our concerns and even sent copies of our resolutions to everyone, including your lordship. Yet, this secretive oath leaves us bewildered,” Pandey stated.

No official statement has been issued by the Allahabad High Court regarding the swearing-in, adding to the mystery surrounding the event. The cash recovery incident has reignited debates about judicial accountability, with calls from various quarters for strict action to set a precedent and restore public confidence in the judiciary.

Justice Varma, for his part, has maintained that neither he nor his family had any knowledge of the cash found at their residence. However, the lack of transparency in his swearing-in has fueled accusations of favouritism and raised concerns about the judiciary’s commitment to fairness and openness.

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com