English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Yogi tries to sweep controversy, BJP MLA insists Taj Mahal was a Shiva Temple

Published

8 years ago

on

Yogi at Taj Mahal

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Amid raging controversy triggered by BJP leaders’ attacking Taj Mahal, Uttar Pradesh chief minister visits monument, initiates cleanliness drive

Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath, on Thursday, visited the Taj Mahal in Agra in what is being seen as a damage-control exercise after several BJP leaders and his government’s tourism department dragged the 17th century architectural marvel into a raging controversy.

Adityanath’s visit comes in the wake of contentious and ill-informed remarks made by BJP legislator Sangeet Som (who termed the marble mausoleum as a “blot on Indian culture”) and party MP from Kanpur, Vinay Katiyar (who claimed that the monument was originally a Shiva temple). The UP government’s tourism department too had drawn flak last month after it omitted any reference to the Taj Mahal in a brochure published by it to highlight tourism hotspots of the state.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]With his government and the BJP facing severe criticism over the Taj Mahal row, Adityanath had sought to control the damage to his image and that of his party by asserting at a public event that the UNESCO World Heritage site was “built by the blood and sweat of Indian labourers and sons of Bharat mata” – a comment he reiterated on Thursday. His office had then confirmed that Yogi Adityanath will be visiting Agra and the Taj Mahal to review progress of the many schemes that his government has initiated for the city and its historical monuments.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]However, on Thursday, as the Uttar Pradesh chief minister arrived in Agra and made his way to the Taj Mahal, it seemed that even his personal intervention to quell the row had failed to rein in the errant voices in his party.

With a mask on his face and gloves in his hands, Adityanath, along with his tourism minister Rita Bahuguna Joshi in tow, kicked off a cleanliness drive from the western gate of the Taj Mahal – posing for pictures with brooms and some litter strewn right in front of them.

However, if the chief minister had hoped to sweep aside the controversy over the Taj along with the filth that one could see in the images flashed on screens of television news channels, then the attempt clearly didn’t pay off.

The BJP’s MLA from Agra North, Jagan Prasad Garg, who was accompanying the Uttar Pradesh chief minister at the Taj Mahal complex told reporters: “Several historians believe that there was a Shiva temple at the same place where the Taj Mahal is located. Mughals first demolished the Shiva temple and then built the Taj Mahal. It is a fact.” Garg was reiterating the misleading and historically inaccurate claim that was recently made by BJP MP Vinay Katiyar and has in the past been pushed by the BJP-RSS brigade and a section of self-styled historians like PN Oak who have time and again propounded the outlandish theory that the marble mausoleum stands over the debirs of a temple called the Tejo Mahalaya which was dedicated to Lord Shiva.

The Opposition didn’t seem to buy Adityanath’s visit to the Taj Mahal as a genuine attempt to silence the critics of the mausoleum commissioned by Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan to serve as a tomb for his favourite wife, Mumtaz Mahal. Adityanath’s predecessor and Samajwadi Party chief, Akhilesh Yadav, mocked the chief minister’s Taj Mahal visit calling it “Bhagwan Ram ka kamala (a wonder because of Lord Ram)”.

“See how times change… BJP did not consider it (the Taj Mahal) as heritage… and now the CM is cleaning the West Gate of Taj Mahal with a broom… I am waiting for him to get clicked on that seat (referring to a bench in front of Taj Mahal where visitors generally get their photograph clicked with the monument in their background),” Akhilesh told reporters in Lucknow.

Adityanath claimed that those opposing his visit to the Taj Mahal were “people who have divided the society on the basis of caste”. He perhaps chose to forget that by raking up an unnecessary controversy based on enormously flawed theories over the Taj Mahal, the BJP was trying to do exactly the same.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

9 hours ago

on

April 16, 2026

By

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

16 hours ago

on

April 16, 2026

By

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

18 hours ago

on

April 16, 2026

By

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com