English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Yogi’s Gorakhpur, not Taj Mahal, finds a spot in UP tourism booklet

Published

on

Hillary Clinton, then First Lady of the USA, and daughter Chelsea at the Taj Mahal. Credit: Agencies

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Opposition slams Adityanath government for “pettiness”, “obvious communal bias” for excluding the 17th Century Mughal monument from its tourism brochure

Former US president Bill Clinton, who visited the Taj Mahal during his presidency, had famously said of the 17th Century Mughal monument built by Emperor Shah Jahan in memory of his favourite wife – Mumtaz Mahal: there are two kinds of people in the world, those who have seen the Taj Mahal and those who haven’t. Perhaps the Yogi Adityanath government in Uttar Pradesh belongs to the latter category of people.

One of the world’s seven wonders with an international fan following that includes the likes of current and former heads of States, the late Princess Diana, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, etc., the Taj Mahal doesn’t find a mention in a recently released UP tourism brochure.

A 32-page booklet titled ‘Uttar Pradesh Paryatan – Apaar Sambhavanaayein’ (UP Tourism-Unlimited Possibilities), published by the state’s tourism department and released recently in Lucknow at a press conference on World Tourism Day (September 27) by tourism minister Rita Bahuguna Joshi, mentions over a dozen existing and proposed tourism sites of UP. Yet, the Taj Mahal – a UNESCO World Heritage Site which receives over eight million domestic and foreign tourists annually – finds no mention in the booklet.

Britain's Prince William and wife Kate Middleton during their visit to the Taj last year. Credit: Agencies. 

Britain’s Prince William and wife Kate Middleton during their visit to the Taj last year. Credit: Agencies.

Interestingly, several of the sites that find prime mention in the brochure are those that are either well aligned with the BJP’s focus on Hindutva and the Hindu identity or those that are close to chief minister Yogi Adityanath. So the booklet dedicates a full page to the Gorakhnath temple of which Adityanath is the head priest while the publication’s cover features an image of the Ganga Arati in Varanasi – the ancient city central to Hindu mythology and current Lok Sabha constituency of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Other tourism ‘hotspots’ that find glowing mentions in the brochure include religious sites and tourist circuits like Ayodhya (promoted as the birthplace of Lord Ram), Mathura and Vrindavan (for their connection with Lord Krishna), the Devipatan Shakti Peeth among others. The brochure also highlights the religious and cultural significance of Varanasi and its ghats along with the Ardh Kumbh Mela of Allahabad.

As news of the exclusion of Taj Mahal from the new tourism booklet gained traction, attracting sharp criticism from Opposition parties like the Congress which said the move was indicative of the Adityanath government’s “pettiness” or the Samajwadi Party which said it reflected the administration’s “obvious communal bias”, the tourism department put forth a feeble defence.

“This wasn’t a compendium of tourist attractions in UP, merely a book to highlight works done by the incumbent government and the projects it plans to take up. The booklet finds mention of projects worth Rs 154 crore in the category of pro-poor tourism, which generate high employment,” Avneesh Awasthi, director general UP tourism, said, adding that the brochure mentions “three projects in the vicinity of the Taj Mahal”.

Incidentally, the brochure does mention the state government’s proposed Heritage Arc — comprising Agra, Lucknow and Varanasi — in the booklet but carefully omits any reference to the internationally acclaimed historical white marble structure.Lucknow and Varanasi — in the booklet but carefully omits any reference to the internationally acclaimed historical white marble structure.

The BJP and its chief minister Adityanath’s contempt for the Taj Mahal is not new. Months after becoming the state’s chief minister, Adityanath had stirred a controversy by decrying the decades-old Indian diplomacy tradition of presenting replicas of Taj Mahal to foreign dignitaries and asserting that the monument “doesn’t represent Indian culture”. He had said that foreign dignitaries should be presented with copies of Ramayana or Gita instead.

Adityanath’s deputy, Dinesh Sharma had in September said that Mughals “were not our ancestors but looters” and described Shah Jahan as a “barbaric ruler” while endorsing the falsehood that the Mughal Emperor had got hands of the construction workers who built the Taj Mahal amputated. The amputation theory is one that finds no basis in history but has been in circulation in India for decades, thanks to the misinformation spread by several tourist guides at the Taj and self-styled BJP-sympathizing historians like PN Oak who had floated the absurd theory that the Mughal tomb was built atop a Shiva temple and was originally called Tejo Mahala. Oak’s petition to the Supreme Court over a decade ago, in which he had demanded excavation of the Taj Mahal’s foundation to support his theory had been summarily dismissed.

The state government’s move to drop Taj Mahal from its tourism booklet drew flak from Twitter users too.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

India hits back at Shehbaz Sharif at UN, says terror will have consequences

India hit back at Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s UN speech, with New Delhi warning that terrorism will have consequences.

Published

on

India has responded to Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s remarks at the United Nations, delivering a strong message on terrorism and warning that such actions will have consequences.

The response came after Mr Sharif addressed the UN and raised issues concerning India and Pakistan. New Delhi rejected the narrative presented by the Pakistani prime minister and highlighted the issue of terrorism.

India’s message was delivered by Petal Gehlot, who represented New Delhi in the response to Pakistan.

India warns Pakistan over terrorism

India’s response focused on Pakistan’s record and its approach towards terrorism. New Delhi made clear that terrorism cannot be separated from its consequences and that those responsible cannot expect such actions to go unanswered.

The Indian side also pushed back against the claims and allegations made by Mr Sharif during his UN speech.

The exchange comes amid continuing tensions between India and Pakistan, with terrorism remaining a major point of disagreement between the two countries.

Shehbaz Sharif’s UN remarks

In his address, Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif spoke about India-Pakistan relations and raised several issues concerning New Delhi.

India subsequently exercised its right of reply to respond to Pakistan’s statements at the United Nations.

New Delhi’s response underlined its position that terrorism remains a serious issue in the relationship and that there would be consequences for terrorist actions.

The latest exchange at the UN adds to the continuing diplomatic confrontation between the two neighbouring countries.

Continue Reading

India News

Veeramani POCSO case: Vijay questions Stalin over earlier probe

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay has questioned MK Stalin over the handling of the Veeramani POCSO case, while Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected anyone.

Published

on

Actor Vijay

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) president C Joseph Vijay has questioned DMK president MK Stalin over the handling of the POCSO case involving Gem Granites founder R Veeramani. The political exchange follows renewed investigation into allegations involving minor girls.

Vijay’s remarks came as the ruling TVK stepped up its questions about how the case was handled during the previous DMK government. The party’s IT wing has alleged that the earlier investigation was weakened and questioned why a final report was filed.

The allegations have been rejected by the DMK. Stalin has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to protect anyone in the case and has called the allegations false and defamatory.

What did Vijay say about the Veeramani case?

Vijay questioned Stalin over the handling of the case and demanded an explanation from the former chief minister.

The TVK has specifically questioned why action was not taken against Veeramani during the previous administration and why the earlier investigation resulted in a closure report.

The party has also raised questions about the role of officials involved in the earlier investigation. These are political allegations made by the TVK and have not been established as facts.

What is the Veeramani POCSO case?

The case concerns allegations of sexual abuse of minors involving R Veeramani, the founder of Gem Granites.

The case came under renewed scrutiny after a special POCSO court rejected an earlier closure report and ordered further investigation. The expanded probe has subsequently identified additional alleged survivors who were minors at the time of the alleged offences, according to current reporting.

The investigation is also examining the circumstances surrounding the earlier probe and whether there were any lapses in how the case was handled.

What has MK Stalin said?

Stalin has rejected allegations that the previous DMK government protected Veeramani.

He has said that no order was issued by the DMK government to shield anyone in the case. Stalin has also said that everyone responsible for the alleged offences, including anyone who aided or attempted to protect the accused, should face the law.

The DMK president has further said that the focus should remain on securing justice for the affected girls rather than making political allegations.

Why has the case become a political issue?

The Veeramani case has become the subject of a political dispute between the ruling TVK and the DMK over the handling of the earlier investigation.

The TVK is questioning the previous government’s handling of the case, while the DMK has denied that it intervened to protect the accused.

At this stage, claims about political interference or deliberate weakening of the earlier investigation should be treated as allegations unless established by the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

Continue Reading

India News

Women wrestlers challenge Brij Bhushan’s acquittal in sexual harassment case

Four women wrestlers have challenged the acquittal of former WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and co-accused Vinod Tomar in a sexual harassment case.

Published

on

Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh

Four women wrestlers have approached a Delhi court challenging the acquittal of former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief and BJP leader Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in a sexual harassment case.

The wrestlers have also challenged the acquittal of co-accused Vinod Tomar. The matter is scheduled to be heard by a Special Judge at the Rouse Avenue Courts.

The appeal challenges the order passed by an Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on August 3, 2026, when Brij Bhushan and Tomar were acquitted in the case.

Wrestlers challenge court’s reasoning

In their appeal, the wrestlers have argued that the acquittal order is legally unsustainable and that the evidence was not assessed appropriately.

They have also alleged that the order relied on assumptions about how victims of sexual assault and harassment were expected to behave instead of assessing the evidence and circumstances of the complainants.

The challenge seeks judicial scrutiny of the findings that resulted in the acquittal of Brij Bhushan and Tomar.

Brij Bhushan was acquitted in August

The Rouse Avenue court acquitted Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh on August 3 in the sexual harassment case involving women wrestlers. The court’s decision followed consideration of the evidence and statements presented during the proceedings.

The case had emerged after several women wrestlers accused the former WFI chief of sexual harassment. The allegations had led to a major protest by wrestlers in 2023.

The latest appeal means the acquittal is now being challenged before a higher court.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com