English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Yogi’s Gorakhpur, not Taj Mahal, finds a spot in UP tourism booklet

Published

on

Hillary Clinton, then First Lady of the USA, and daughter Chelsea at the Taj Mahal. Credit: Agencies

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Opposition slams Adityanath government for “pettiness”, “obvious communal bias” for excluding the 17th Century Mughal monument from its tourism brochure

Former US president Bill Clinton, who visited the Taj Mahal during his presidency, had famously said of the 17th Century Mughal monument built by Emperor Shah Jahan in memory of his favourite wife – Mumtaz Mahal: there are two kinds of people in the world, those who have seen the Taj Mahal and those who haven’t. Perhaps the Yogi Adityanath government in Uttar Pradesh belongs to the latter category of people.

One of the world’s seven wonders with an international fan following that includes the likes of current and former heads of States, the late Princess Diana, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, etc., the Taj Mahal doesn’t find a mention in a recently released UP tourism brochure.

A 32-page booklet titled ‘Uttar Pradesh Paryatan – Apaar Sambhavanaayein’ (UP Tourism-Unlimited Possibilities), published by the state’s tourism department and released recently in Lucknow at a press conference on World Tourism Day (September 27) by tourism minister Rita Bahuguna Joshi, mentions over a dozen existing and proposed tourism sites of UP. Yet, the Taj Mahal – a UNESCO World Heritage Site which receives over eight million domestic and foreign tourists annually – finds no mention in the booklet.

Britain's Prince William and wife Kate Middleton during their visit to the Taj last year. Credit: Agencies. 

Britain’s Prince William and wife Kate Middleton during their visit to the Taj last year. Credit: Agencies.

Interestingly, several of the sites that find prime mention in the brochure are those that are either well aligned with the BJP’s focus on Hindutva and the Hindu identity or those that are close to chief minister Yogi Adityanath. So the booklet dedicates a full page to the Gorakhnath temple of which Adityanath is the head priest while the publication’s cover features an image of the Ganga Arati in Varanasi – the ancient city central to Hindu mythology and current Lok Sabha constituency of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Other tourism ‘hotspots’ that find glowing mentions in the brochure include religious sites and tourist circuits like Ayodhya (promoted as the birthplace of Lord Ram), Mathura and Vrindavan (for their connection with Lord Krishna), the Devipatan Shakti Peeth among others. The brochure also highlights the religious and cultural significance of Varanasi and its ghats along with the Ardh Kumbh Mela of Allahabad.

As news of the exclusion of Taj Mahal from the new tourism booklet gained traction, attracting sharp criticism from Opposition parties like the Congress which said the move was indicative of the Adityanath government’s “pettiness” or the Samajwadi Party which said it reflected the administration’s “obvious communal bias”, the tourism department put forth a feeble defence.

“This wasn’t a compendium of tourist attractions in UP, merely a book to highlight works done by the incumbent government and the projects it plans to take up. The booklet finds mention of projects worth Rs 154 crore in the category of pro-poor tourism, which generate high employment,” Avneesh Awasthi, director general UP tourism, said, adding that the brochure mentions “three projects in the vicinity of the Taj Mahal”.

Incidentally, the brochure does mention the state government’s proposed Heritage Arc — comprising Agra, Lucknow and Varanasi — in the booklet but carefully omits any reference to the internationally acclaimed historical white marble structure.Lucknow and Varanasi — in the booklet but carefully omits any reference to the internationally acclaimed historical white marble structure.

The BJP and its chief minister Adityanath’s contempt for the Taj Mahal is not new. Months after becoming the state’s chief minister, Adityanath had stirred a controversy by decrying the decades-old Indian diplomacy tradition of presenting replicas of Taj Mahal to foreign dignitaries and asserting that the monument “doesn’t represent Indian culture”. He had said that foreign dignitaries should be presented with copies of Ramayana or Gita instead.

Adityanath’s deputy, Dinesh Sharma had in September said that Mughals “were not our ancestors but looters” and described Shah Jahan as a “barbaric ruler” while endorsing the falsehood that the Mughal Emperor had got hands of the construction workers who built the Taj Mahal amputated. The amputation theory is one that finds no basis in history but has been in circulation in India for decades, thanks to the misinformation spread by several tourist guides at the Taj and self-styled BJP-sympathizing historians like PN Oak who had floated the absurd theory that the Mughal tomb was built atop a Shiva temple and was originally called Tejo Mahala. Oak’s petition to the Supreme Court over a decade ago, in which he had demanded excavation of the Taj Mahal’s foundation to support his theory had been summarily dismissed.

The state government’s move to drop Taj Mahal from its tourism booklet drew flak from Twitter users too.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]JTNDYmxvY2txdW90ZSUyMGNsYXNzJTNEJTIydHdpdHRlci10d2VldCUyMiUyMGRhdGEtbGFuZyUzRCUyMmVuJTIyJTNFJTNDcCUyMGxhbmclM0QlMjJlbiUyMiUyMGRpciUzRCUyMmx0ciUyMiUzRSUzQ2ElMjBocmVmJTNEJTIyaHR0cHMlM0ElMkYlMkZ0d2l0dGVyLmNvbSUyRmhhc2h0YWclMkZUYWpNYWhhbCUzRnNyYyUzRGhhc2glMjZhbXAlM0JyZWZfc3JjJTNEdHdzcmMlMjU1RXRmdyUyMiUzRSUyM1Rhak1haGFsJTNDJTJGYSUzRSUyQyUyMG9uZSUyMGFtb25nJTIwdGhlJTIwNyUyMHdvbmRlcnMlMjBvZiUyMHRoZSUyMHdvcmxkJTJDJTIwbm90JTIwYSUyMHRvdXJpc3QlMjBzcG90JTIwZm9yJTIwVVAlMjBnb3Z0LlRvdXJpc3RzJTIwd2lsbCUyMHZpc2l0JTIwVVAlMjBob3NwaXRhbHMlMjB3aGVyZSUyMGNoaWxkJTI2JTIzMzklM0JzJTIwZGllJTIwZXZlcnlkYXkuJTNDJTJGcCUzRSUyNm1kYXNoJTNCJTIwQXJzaGFkJTIwWW91c3VmJTIwJTI4JTQwQXJzaGFkWW91c3VmQ0NQJTI5JTIwJTNDYSUyMGhyZWYlM0QlMjJodHRwcyUzQSUyRiUyRnR3aXR0ZXIuY29tJTJGQXJzaGFkWW91c3VmQ0NQJTJGc3RhdHVzJTJGOTE1MTA4MTc1MDIzNTA1NDA5JTNGcmVmX3NyYyUzRHR3c3JjJTI1NUV0ZnclMjIlM0VPY3RvYmVyJTIwMyUyQyUyMDIwMTclM0MlMkZhJTNFJTNDJTJGYmxvY2txdW90ZSUzRSUwQSUzQ3NjcmlwdCUyMGFzeW5jJTIwc3JjJTNEJTIyJTJGJTJGcGxhdGZvcm0udHdpdHRlci5jb20lMkZ3aWRnZXRzLmpzJTIyJTIwY2hhcnNldCUzRCUyMnV0Zi04JTIyJTNFJTNDJTJGc2NyaXB0JTNF[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Assam clears Uniform Civil Code bill, becomes third state after Uttarakhand and Gujarat

Assam has officially become the third state in India to pass the Uniform Civil Code bill. The legislation was cleared by the state assembly on Wednesday despite strong objections raised by opposition lawmakers who claimed it impacts minority rights.

Published

on

himanta

The Assam Legislative Assembly on Wednesday passed ‘The Uniform Civil Code, Assam, 2026 Bill’, making it the third state ruled by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to adopt a uniform legal framework after Uttarakhand and Gujarat.

Opposition flags concerns over rights during house debate

The bill was taken up for final passage in the state assembly on Wednesday, sparking a heated discussion among lawmakers. During the legislative floor debate, opposition MLAs strongly voiced their concerns regarding the proposed law, stating that the legislation will hurt and compromise the fundamental rights of a certain section of society.

Despite objections from the opposition benches, the treasury benches cleared the passage of the bill, cementing Assam’s position as the latest state to move away from diverse personal laws in favor of a uniform code. Media reported that the legislative move follows extensive political discussions in the state surrounding civil regulations. With this enactment, Assam joins Uttarakhand and Gujarat, which have previously passed their respective uniform civil codes.

Continue Reading

India News

Case registered against Mamata Banerjee over controversial 2025 religion remark

A formal police case has been registered against Trinamool Congress supremo Mamata Banerjee in Siliguri, West Bengal. The complaint alleges that her 2025 “Ganda Dharm” remark targeted Hinduism and hurt the religious sentiments of the community.

Published

on

Mamata Banerjee

A formal police complaint has been lodged against Trinamool Congress (TMC) chief Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal’s Siliguri. The legal action stems from an alleged derogatory remark regarding Hinduism made during an Eid congregation in Kolkata in 2025.

The case was registered following a complaint filed by a local lawyer, Rinki Chatterjee, who alleged that the former Chief Minister’s comments deeply hurt the religious sentiments of Hindus globally.

Legal charges and complaint details

The police have invoked multiple sections under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) against Banerjee, including Section 351(1) for criminal intimidation, Section 352 for intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, and Section 353 for promoting feelings of enmity, hatred, or ill will between different communities.

According to the complaint, the controversy traces back to an Eid event organized on Kolkata’s iconic Red Road in 2025. While delivering a speech targeting the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Banerjee purportedly referred to the version of Hinduism championed by the political rival as “Ganda Dharm” (filthy religion).

Chatterjee stated in her complaint that labeling Sanatan Dharma in such a manner at a religious gathering was “absolutely unacceptable”. The complainant also pointed to other instances where senior TMC leaders allegedly targeted Hinduism, adding that Banerjee made indirect threats to the Hindu community during the 2026 West Bengal Assembly election campaign to influence voters through intimidation.

Political responses to the FIR

The reported statements had previously drawn sharp criticism from the state BJP leadership last year, including strong objections from current Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari. However, this FIR represents the first formal legal action taken regarding the speech.

When approached for a response, Atri Sharma, a lawyer and general secretary of the TMC’s Darjeeling unit, declined to comment officially as a party spokesperson. However, he noted that many within the party internal circles found the remarks inappropriate at the time they were spoken. Sharma acknowledged that holding a high public office required restraint and affirmed that every individual holds the moral right to pursue legal remedies.

Continue Reading

India News

Enforcement Directorate raids former Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan’s residence in money laundering probe

The Enforcement Directorate on Wednesday carried out searches at the Thiruvananthapuram residence of former Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and 11 other locations in connection with a money-laundering probe registered in 2024.

Published

on

The Enforcement Directorate on Wednesday conducted extensive searches at the Thiruvananthapuram residence of former Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan. The action comes as part of an ongoing money-laundering investigation, with the central probe agency executing simultaneous raids at 12 separate locations across the state under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

Broad Crackdown in Financial Probe

The central agency’s operations focused significantly on Vijayan’s rented residence in the state capital, alongside eleven other locations, including premises in Kochi, Kozhikode, Kannur, and Bengaluru. This major enforcement action was initiated shortly after the Kerala High Court dismissed a petition on Tuesday, which had been filed by Cochin Minerals And Rutile Ltd (CMRL) seeking to quash the ongoing ED proceedings.

The roots of the financial investigation trace back to a PMLA case registered in 2024. The core allegation involves an estimated illegal payment of ₹1.72 crore made between 2017 and 2019 by a private entity, Cochin Minerals And Rutile Ltd (CMRL), to Exalogic Solutions, an IT firm owned by Vijayan’s daughter, T Veena.

According to investigators, the financial transactions took place despite the IT firm allegedly rendering no services to the private company. Apart from the financial probe agency’s scrutiny, the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) is also independently conducting an inquiry into the wider financial transactions of the matter.

Political Developments

The searches also covered locations linked to other political and executive figures associated with the matter, including premises connected to senior CMRL executives. While the ruling party has previously described the investigations as politically motivated, the central agency has intensified its probe following the high court’s refusal to grant interim relief to the private firm. The case has sparked intense political debate, with opposition parties using the findings to allege financial irregularities, while local party leaders maintain that the transactions were part of a legitimate business arrangement.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com