English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Hathras case: AMU doctor who questioned Uttar Pradesh Police version on forensic report told to go

A doctor at Aligarh Muslim University’s Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College who had spoken to media and questioned Uttar Pradesh police’s version of the Hathras rape case has been told by the hospital that his services are not required any longer.

Published

on

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College

A doctor at Aligarh Muslim University’s Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College who had spoken to media and questioned Uttar Pradesh police’s version of the Hathras rape case has been told by the hospital that his services are not required any longer. Dr Azeem Malik had said that the FSL (forensic science laboratory) report, which stated no sperms were found in the sample, held no value as the sample was collected after a delay of 11 days.

His statement contradicted Additional Director General (Law and Order), Prashant Kumar’s statement, who had said that absence of the semen in the sample indicated that no rape took place. Apart from Dr Malik, another doctor at the hospital Dr Obaid Haque has also been issued a similar latter by the hospital. The latter had attested medico-legal case report of the 19-year-old victim.

Hathras gangrape victim's family

Both the doctors received letter with CMO in-charge Dr SAH Zaidi’s signature on it stating that their appointment on the post of Medical Officer, Emergency & Trauma, JNMCH, was being rejected with immediate effect after instructions by the  Vice Chancellor of the University. The doctors were asked not to perform any further duties.  

While the doctors say that they have been suspended, the administration maintains that doctors were asked to fill in temporary vacancies created by the absence of CMOs as many of them got infected with COVID-19. It said that services of the doctors are not required any longer as CMOs have reported back to work. The administration said that they are aware that the doctors are not happy with the decision and the matter is being look into.

Read Also: Madhya Pradesh minister Usha Thakur says all terrorists are raised in madrasas, sparks controversy

The Dalit woman who was gangraped by 4 men was admitted to AMU Hospital for two weeks. She was later taken to Delhi’s Safdarjung Hospital where she succumbed to her injuries. Central Bureau of investigation is currently probing the case.

India News

Parliament panel seeks Zuckerberg’s apology over PM Modi video removal, questions Meta’s accountability

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on IT has sought an apology from Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg over the temporary removal of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Facebook video, while raising concerns over accountability, algorithmic bias and safe harbour protection.

Published

on

The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Information Technology has sought an apology from Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg over the temporary removal of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Facebook video, saying that a simple expression of regret would not be enough unless accountability is fixed.

The committee, chaired by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, met representatives of Meta, Google, YouTube, senior officials from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), and the Union Home Ministry to discuss issues related to social media regulation, algorithmic transparency and platform accountability.

Panel demands accountability over PM Modi video removal

During the meeting, members questioned Meta over the removal of a Facebook video in which Prime Minister Narendra Modi addressed young people and promised strict action against exam paper leaks.

According to sources, committee members asked who was responsible for taking down the video and why it was removed while other objectionable content remained on the platform. Meta reportedly expressed regret over the incident and offered an apology.

However, members of the panel maintained that the matter should not end with an apology alone. They said responsibility for the lapse must be established and legal action should be considered wherever required.

The committee also questioned what safeguards ordinary Indian users have if the Prime Minister’s content could be removed in such a manner.

Nishikant Dubey warns over safe harbour protection

Speaking after the meeting, Nishikant Dubey said Mark Zuckerberg should personally apologise for the incident.

He also warned that if such an apology is not forthcoming, Meta’s “safe harbour” protection could come under scrutiny. Safe harbour provisions protect online platforms from liability for third-party content, provided they comply with due diligence requirements under Indian law.

Dubey further claimed that the Prime Minister’s video remained unavailable for around five hours and described the matter as serious.

Panel raises concerns over algorithms and child safety

Apart from the video controversy, the committee also questioned Meta over alleged algorithmic bias and the way content is promoted on social media platforms.

Dubey said the committee unanimously discussed concerns regarding algorithm-driven reach and claimed that newer or unregistered groups were receiving greater visibility than recognised political parties. He said understanding how platforms determine content reach was important for the country.

The meeting also included discussions on child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and the responsibilities of social media companies in preventing such content from appearing on their platforms.

MeitY had earlier questioned Meta’s explanation

Last week, MeitY had summoned Meta’s global team over issues related to algorithmic bias, platform processes and their potential impact on public order.

Meta had attributed the temporary removal of the Prime Minister’s video to a technical glitch. However, according to sources, the ministry considered the explanation inadequate.

Separately, Hyderabad Cyber Crime Police have registered cases against Meta India head Arun Srinivas and certain Facebook and Instagram accounts over allegedly morphed and AI-generated posts targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Continue Reading

India News

Prashant Kishor wins Bankipur bypoll, secures first electoral victory in BJP bastion

Prashant Kishor won the Bankipur Assembly bypoll in Bihar by defeating BJP candidate Neeraj Kumar by 19,324 votes. The victory marks Kishor’s first electoral success and Jan Suraaj’s maiden Assembly seat.

Published

on

Jan Suraaj chief Prashant Kishore

Jan Suraaj Party (JSP) founder Prashant Kishor has registered his maiden electoral victory by winning the Bankipur Assembly bypoll in Bihar, ending the BJP’s long dominance in the constituency. The former election strategist defeated BJP candidate Neeraj Kumar by a margin of 19,324 votes, marking the first Assembly seat won by both Kishor and his party.

According to Election Commission data, Kishor secured 64,151 votes, while Neeraj Kumar polled 44,827 votes. Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) candidate Rekha Kumari finished third with 14,273 votes.

Prashant Kishor promises visible changes in Bankipur

After the victory, Prashant Kishor thanked the voters and assured them that development work would begin immediately.

Addressing reporters, he said people would witness visible changes in Bankipur within three months and requested residents to give him that time. He also said his office would remain open not only for the people of Bankipur but for everyone in Bihar.

Kishor described the victory as significant, saying his party had managed to end what he called the BJP’s three-decade hold over the constituency in just 30 days of campaigning.

Says Bihar voters have sent a message to BJP

Speaking after the results, Kishor said the people of Bihar had conveyed a message to the BJP’s central leadership that the state needed a chief minister focused on improving education and creating employment opportunities. He also said voters wanted leadership with a clean public image.

Bihar Chief Minister congratulates Kishor

Bihar Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary congratulated Prashant Kishor on his victory through a post on X.

He said the people had chosen Jan Suraaj in the Bankipur Assembly by-election and extended his congratulations while respecting the democratic verdict.

Why the Bankipur bypoll drew national attention

The Bankipur by-election attracted national attention for several reasons. The constituency has long been considered a BJP stronghold and was represented for multiple terms by senior BJP leader Nitin Nabin, who vacated the seat after moving to the Rajya Sabha.

The contest also gained prominence after Prashant Kishor entered the fray and came in the backdrop of nationwide student protests centred around education-related issues. Political observers had closely watched whether young voters would influence the outcome in the urban Patna constituency.

The BJP also witnessed a last-minute change in candidate after Abhishek Kumar Sinha withdrew before filing his nomination, following which the party fielded youth wing leader Neeraj Kumar. The RJD nominated Rekha Kumari.

Jan Suraaj opens its electoral account

The victory marks a milestone for the Jan Suraaj Party, which had failed to win any seats in the 2025 Bihar Assembly election. Kishor himself had not contested that election.

With the Bankipur result, Jan Suraaj has opened its electoral account, while Kishor has entered the Bihar Assembly for the first time.

Reacting to the outcome, Jan Suraaj’s Bihar chief Manoj Bharti said the people of Bankipur had voted for change. He claimed the party received support across different sections of society and thanked what he described as the party’s “silent voters” for helping secure the victory.

Continue Reading

India News

Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh acquitted in women wrestlers’ sexual harassment case

A Delhi court has acquitted former BJP MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and former WFI official Vinod Tomar in the sexual harassment case filed by six women wrestlers.

Published

on

Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh

Former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP and former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh was acquitted on Monday by a Delhi court in the sexual harassment case filed by six women wrestlers.

Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM) Ashwini Panwar of the Rouse Avenue Courts delivered the verdict. Co-accused Vinod Tomar, former Assistant Secretary of the WFI, was also acquitted in the case.

As media personnel were not allowed inside the courtroom, Singh’s lawyers described the verdict as an “honourable acquittal.”

Case was based on complaints by six women wrestlers

The case stemmed from allegations of sexual harassment made by six women wrestlers against Singh. Acting on their complaints, the Delhi Police registered a First Information Report (FIR).

On June 15, 2023, the police filed a chargesheet against Singh under Sections 354 (outraging a woman’s modesty), 354A (sexual harassment), 354D (stalking) and 506(1) (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Court had framed charges in 2024

On May 10, 2024, the trial court framed charges against Singh for alleged sexual harassment and outraging the modesty of five women wrestlers, observing that there was sufficient material on record to proceed with the trial.

The court had also framed charges under Section 506(1) of the IPC in relation to allegations of criminal intimidation involving two wrestlers.

Vinod Tomar was charged with criminal intimidation over allegations that he had threatened one of the complainants.

POCSO case had already been closed

A separate case under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act had also been registered after a minor wrestler levelled allegations against Singh. However, the minor later withdrew her complaint, following which the Delhi Police filed a cancellation report. The POCSO case was subsequently closed.

Advocates Rajiv Mohan, Rishabh Bhati, Rehan Khan and Suryansh Singh appeared for Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh during the proceedings.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com