The Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kanpur has officially released the GATE 2025 results today, March 19. Candidates can check their scores on the official website gate2025.iitr.ac.in.

The Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering (GATE) scorecard is widely used for multiple opportunities, including admissions to postgraduate and doctoral programs, financial assistance, and recruitment in Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs).

GATE 2025 score: admission and financial assistance benefits

A valid GATE score serves as a gateway to Master’s and direct Doctoral programs in Engineering, Technology, Architecture, Science, Commerce, Arts, and Humanities at government-supported institutions. Candidates who secure admission to these programs can also apply for financial assistance:

MTech students receive a stipend of ₹12,400 per month for up to 22 months.

PhD candidates (direct PhD after BE/BTech/MSc equivalent with a valid GATE score) receive:

Rs 37,000 per month for the first two years

Rs 42,000 per month for the third to fifth years

PSU recruitment through GATE 2025

Apart from academic opportunities, GATE-qualified candidates can also apply for jobs at PSUs, which use the score as part of their recruitment process. Some of the PSUs hiring through GATE 2025 include:

Airports Authority of India (AAI)

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL)

Coal India Limited (CIL)

Electronics Corporation of India Limited (ECIL)

Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL)

Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL)

National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC)

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC)

Power Grid Corporation of India (POWERGRID)

Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL)

New additions to GATE 2025 exam process

This year, several new changes have been introduced to the GATE exam process:

IIT Kanpur’s BSBE department will use GATE 2025 scores for MTech admissions.

NPCIL will use GATE 2025 results from CE, CH, EC, EE, IN, and ME test papers for recruitment.

GRID-INDIA will consider EE test paper results for hiring.

GAIL (India) Limited will recruit using CH, CS, EE, IN, and ME test papers.

Candidates seeking more information on GATE 2025 admissions, financial assistance, and PSU job opportunities can visit the official website for further details.

The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) recently announced domestic contracts for 90 women cricketers for the 2024-25 season, increasing the number of contracted players from 79 last season. However, despite the rise in contracts, the financial compensation for players remains alarmingly low.

Low retainers and match fees spark concerns

The newly announced contracts include 10 capped national players, 62 emerging players, and 18 Under-19 players. However, the retainers for these cricketers stand at just PKR 35,000 (approximately USD 125) per month—below Pakistan’s minimum wage for unskilled laborers (PKR 37,000). Additionally, the match fee for domestic games remains at PKR 20,000 (USD 71), with players reportedly not receiving daily allowances this season.

While PCB claims that these contracts aim to “expand the talent pool” and “inspire young players,” financial constraints continue to push players away from the domestic circuit within a short span.

Limited earning potential for domestic cricketers

Despite the increase in contracts, the earning opportunities for Pakistan’s women cricketers remain minimal. The maximum amount a fully active domestic player can earn in a season—including match fees and retainers—is PKR 1,040,000 (USD 3,700). However, players who do not make the playing XI earn only PKR 10,000 (USD 35) per match.

With cricket-related expenses, including personal trainers and diet management, estimated at PKR 600,000 annually, many players struggle to afford essential facilities for their professional development. As one player stated, “Living in Pakistan, not everyone can afford a professional athlete life… I spend PKR 400,000 on my cricket, but I can’t afford a personal trainer.”

PCB’s spending on women’s cricket raises questions

Under the current administration, PCB had announced an increase in investment for women’s cricket from PKR 70 million to PKR 240 million. However, this investment has not translated into significant improvements in earnings or infrastructure for women’s cricket.

Comparisons with other cricket boards highlight the disparity. Cricket Australia, which earns only slightly more from the International Cricket Council (ICC) than PCB, ensures that domestic players earn an average of USD 96,000 annually. Even New Zealand Cricket, which earns less from ICC revenue than PCB, offers better salaries, with the lowest-paid domestic player making USD 11,000—nearly three times more than the highest-earning Pakistani domestic cricketer.

In India, even the lowest-paid player in the Women’s Premier League earns INR 10 lakh (USD 11,500) for a three-week tournament, while top players can earn up to INR 2 crore (USD 230,500).

Gender pay gap in PCB’s structure

While women’s cricket remains underfunded, male domestic cricketers in Pakistan earn significantly higher wages. A player featuring in a Quaid-e-Azam Trophy match receives PKR 200,000 (USD 715) per game. A “Grade A” contracted male domestic cricketer earns PKR 550,000 (USD 2,000) per month, while even the lowest-tier male contract offers PKR 250,000 (USD 890) per month.

Revised figures shared on social media suggest that PCB’s expenditure on match fees for senior and Under-19 men’s cricketers alone stands at USD 390,361—far exceeding the entire budget for women’s cricket (USD 250,060) from the previous season.

Congress leader Shashi Tharoor has acknowledged that he was mistaken in opposing India’s neutral stance at the onset of the Russia-Ukraine war. Speaking at the Raisina Dialogue, Tharoor admitted he was left with “egg on his face” after realizing that India’s approach has positioned it as a key player in potential peace negotiations.

Tharoor, who had initially criticized India’s position during the February 2022 parliamentary debate, argued at the time that Russia had violated the UN Charter and Ukraine’s sovereignty. However, he now concedes that India’s diplomatic strategy has enhanced its global standing.

India’s Diplomatic Leverage

“The policy has meant that India actually has a Prime Minister who can hug both the president of Ukraine and the president in Moscow two weeks apart and be accepted in both places,” Tharoor stated during the session titled ‘Waging Peace: Looking Back to Look Ahead’.

He highlighted that India’s geographical distance from Europe and its independent foreign policy have enabled it to be a potential mediator for lasting peace.

India’s Peacekeeping Role?

Although Tharoor emphasized that he cannot speak for the government, he suggested that if an agreed peace between Russia and Ukraine is reached, there might be willingness from India to consider sending peacekeepers.

“Russians have made it explicit that they will not accept European peacekeepers who belong to NATO countries. One would have to look beyond Europe for peacekeepers,” he noted.

Citing India’s history of over 49 peacekeeping missions, Tharoor stated that Indian peacekeepers could play a role if needed. He also recalled India’s strong opposition in 2003 when Parliament unanimously refused to send troops to Iraq after the US-led invasion.

However, he clarified that such resistance may not exist for Ukraine if an official peace agreement emerges.

India’s Global Standing in Conflict Mediation

Tharoor’s remarks reflect a broader acknowledgment of India’s diplomatic positioning, which has allowed the country to maintain strong bilateral relations with both Russia and Ukraine. With ongoing geopolitical tensions, India’s neutral approach continues to gain global recognition as a balancing force in international politics.