The High Commission of India in London has condemned a debate held in British Parliament over safety of farmers and freedom of the press in India amid the ongoing farmers’ agitation against three agricultural laws.
The Commission in a statement said that it deeply regretted that rather than a balanced debate, false assertions without substantiation or facts were made, casting aspersions on the largest functioning democracy in the world and its institutions.
On Monday, the debate was held among British lawmakers in response to an e-petition initiated by Maidenhead Liberal Democrat leader Gurch Singh of Indian origin. The petition had crossed the 1,00 000-signature threshold from UK residents, required for it to be approved by the House of Commons Petitions Committee.
Several MPs of the Labour party, Liberal democrats and the Scottish National Party raised concerns over Indian government’s reaction to the protests.
The Indian High Commission also pointed out that foreign media, including British media, are present in India and have witnessed the events surrounding the farmers’ protests in India first-hand and therefore any question of lack of freedom of the media in India does not arise.
A false narrative over farmers’ protest was sought to be developed even though the High Commission of India has been, over a period of time, taking care to inform all concerned about the issues raised in the petition, said the High Commission in its statement.
The High Commission would have normally refrained from commenting on an internal discussion involving a small group of Parliamentarians in a limited quorum. However, when aspersions are cast on India by anyone, irrespective of their claims of friendship and love for India or domestic political compulsions, there is a need to set the record straight, the statement further read.
Also Read: Sourav Ganguly confirms World Test Championship 2021 Final between India and New Zealand in Southampton, not Lord’s
As the farm reforms are a matter for the Indian government’s decision, we are only debating for the safety of the protesters. The use of water canons, tear gas and repeated clashes between police and farmers have been matters of concern. Also, several farmers have reportedly committed suicide, said Martin Day from Scottish National Party during the debate.
While UK Minister of State for Asia Nigel Adams said British’s close ties with India doesn’t hinder the nation from raising concerns. Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said that the unprecedented protests should make one think about why so many are turning up. The arrests of journalists is a matter of serious concern.
However, Conservative MP Theresa Villiers shared support for the Indian government’s response. We receive complaints against policemen here in the UK too when there are mass protests. That doesn’t mean the UK is against democracy. she said.
Also Read: Yogi Adityanath says secularism is biggest threat to India’s tradition on global stage
Since November last year, the farmers from Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana and across the country have been protesting at the Delhi borders against the Centre’s new farm law. They have laid siege to Delhi even as the government scrambles to find an amicable solution. Despite the government’s offer to hold the legislations, the farmers have argued that they would settle for nothing less than total scrapping of the legislations.
The government has projected the laws as major reforms in the agriculture sector that will remove the mandi system and middlemen and allow farmers to sell their produce anywhere in the country. However, the protesting farmers have argued that the new laws have no mention of minimum support price (MSP) and the mandis that will leave them at the mercy of big corporates.