West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has made a strong political statement during the ongoing West Bengal assembly elections 2026, saying her party will aim for a larger role at the national level after securing victory in the state.

Addressing a rally, Banerjee said that once her party wins the Bengal elections, it will move forward to “take over Delhi,” indicating a broader political strategy beyond the state. The remark comes at a time when campaigning has intensified across constituencies.

Her statement is being seen as part of a wider push by the Trinamool Congress to position itself as a key force against the Bharatiya Janata Party at the national level.

Banerjee has repeatedly expressed confidence that her party will return to power in West Bengal, aiming for another consecutive term.

Political context

The West Bengal elections have witnessed aggressive campaigning from both the ruling Trinamool Congress and the BJP. Leaders from both sides have exchanged sharp remarks, highlighting the high-stakes nature of the contest.

Banerjee’s latest comment adds to her earlier calls for opposition unity and signals her intent to expand political influence beyond the state. Similar remarks in recent weeks have indicated that her party sees the Bengal result as a stepping stone toward a larger national role.

At the same time, BJP leaders have projected confidence about their performance in the elections, further intensifying the political contest.

High-stakes election

The 2026 West Bengal assembly elections are crucial for both parties, with the Trinamool Congress seeking to retain power and the BJP aiming to make significant inroads in the state.

Banerjee’s “Delhi” remark underscores the broader national implications of the election, as regional parties increasingly position themselves in the national political landscape.

The Gauhati High Court has rejected the anticipatory bail plea filed by Congress leader Pawan Khera in connection with a criminal case registered in Assam.

The case stems from a complaint filed by Riniki Bhuyan Sarma, wife of Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, following remarks made by Khera earlier this month.

A single-judge bench heard arguments from both sides earlier this week and reserved its order before delivering the verdict on Friday. With the rejection of anticipatory bail, Khera no longer has protection from arrest in the case.

Background of the case

The FIR against Pawan Khera was lodged after he made allegations during a press conference on April 5, claiming that the Chief Minister’s wife possessed multiple passports and undisclosed overseas assets.

Following these statements, legal proceedings were initiated in Assam, invoking multiple charges including defamation, cheating, and forgery.

Arguments in court

During the hearing, Khera’s legal team argued that the case was politically motivated and that arrest was not necessary, asserting that he was not a flight risk.

On the other hand, the Assam government opposed the plea, stating that the case involved serious offences beyond simple defamation and required custodial investigation.

Supreme Court’s earlier stance

Before approaching the Gauhati High Court, Khera had sought protection from arrest from the Supreme Court. However, the apex court declined to extend relief and directed him to approach the appropriate court in Assam.

What happens next

With the High Court denying anticipatory bail, the legal proceedings against Khera are set to continue, and he may now face arrest depending on the course of the investigation.

The case has also triggered political reactions, adding to tensions between the Congress and the Assam government.

The Election Commission has issued a notice to Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge over his controversial remark referring to Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a “terrorist” during an election campaign.

Taking serious note of the statement, the poll body has asked Kharge to submit his response within 24 hours, highlighting concerns over the language used in public campaigning.

BJP complaint triggered action

The development comes after the Bharatiya Janata Party approached the Election Commission, alleging that the remark violated the Model Code of Conduct. The party described the comment as derogatory and sought strict action against the Congress leader.

A delegation of BJP leaders also met the poll panel, stressing that such statements undermine the standards of political discourse during elections.

Kharge’s clarification

Following the controversy, Kharge clarified that his remarks were being misinterpreted. He said he did not intend to call the Prime Minister a terrorist but was referring to what he described as “terrorising” political opponents through the use of central agencies.

Rising political tensions

The episode has further escalated tensions between the ruling party and the opposition amid an ongoing election season. Leaders across the political spectrum have reacted strongly, with criticism and counter-criticism intensifying the debate around campaign rhetoric.

The Election Commission’s intervention underscores its attempt to maintain decorum and enforce campaign norms as political activity intensifies across states.