English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest Politics News

Pranab Mukherjee at RSS HQ proves detractors wrong, teaches idea of India

Published

on

Pranab Mukherjee at RSS HQ proves detractors wrong, teaches idea of India

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]There was no mention of “Hindu rashtra” even by RSS chief who keeps bringing it up on every other occasion

Former president Pranab Mukherjee’s speech at RSS headquarter in Nagpur last evening, (Thursday, June 7) put paid to all apprehensions about his decision to attend the function and what he would end up doing there.

For days after his plans to go there became known, many believers in democracy and secularism had been overly critical of Mukherjee. What Mukherjee said there should have laid their fears to rest, but, for many, it didn’t, even though the man with a lifetime spent in Congress ripped apart the basic core of RSS tenets while speaking from its platform, in its headquarters, in front of all the trainees and in presence of the sarsanghchalak – RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat – himself.

While RSS functionaries and sympathisers went to town praising Mukherjee, his speech and his visit as being in tune with RSS core beliefs and its “endorsement”, their detractors walked into the trap, focusing on the trivial – like the symbolism of visit, the comment in visitor book about RSS founder KB Hedgewar, standing when the Sangh anthem was played – rather than the substance of what he said.

That is, in fact, what the RSS would like them to focus on, discuss and debate, accusing them of ‘intolerance’ while portraying RSS as being so broadminded as to invite a former, hardcore Congress man to their function as an ‘honoured chief guest’. They would have done well to repeat what Mukherjee said and contrast it with RSS belief and practice, as seen in the speech and actions of workers of not only the parent body but also its offshoots like Vsihwa Hindu Parishad, Bajrang Dal and others.

RSS chief Bhagwat, speaking before Mukherjee, had kept his speech suitably toned down, letting out the troublesome element of RSS tenets only while referring to its formation in 1925 “out of realisation for the need to organise Hindu society”. Otherwise, he spoke of need for a common goal and destiny by forging a unity out of the differences in culture, language etc.

Another notable aspect, overlooked by many, was that the RSS chief refrained from any talk about India being a ‘Hindu rashtra’, which he has been talking about at fairly regular intervals. That he didn’t say it in one of the largest and most important RSS gatherings can be out down to the Pranab effect.

His followers picked up other portions and likened them to portions of Mukherjee’s speech talking about India’s diversity.

Those were taken quite out of context, for what Mukherjee had said was quite different, if one goes through his speech, as reproduced  by NDTV. Bhagwat also did not refer to Hedgewar’s ‘teachings’ contained in the booklets (pathey) provided to RSS swayamsevaks (workers) for their ready reference. Hedgewar talks about Indian being a nation of Hindus and for Hindus, and refers to Muslims as ‘yavana snakes’, using the term originally used for people of Greece (Yunan).

Mukherjee made several points that go against what RSS stands for and preaches. He may have made a courteous comment on the visitor’s book about RSS founder KB Hedgewar, but what he said was quite different. Mukherjee focused on the themes the RSS talks about, but gave an entirely different perspective to them: nation, nationalism and patriotism.

He did not once RSS in his speech while talking about these themes, while he quoted several Congress leaders extensively. He talked about Jawaharlal Nehru, a leader RSS and the crop of organisations it heads have spared no effort to vilify. At the same time he never once mentioned any of the Sangh leaders or their ideologues while talking about personalities who contributed to the making of India: No Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, MS Golwalkar, BS Moonje, or Shyama Prasad Mukherjee.

He spoke of tolerance, pluralism and steadfast loyalty to the Indian Constitution, reading out the Preamble that enshrines the core of a secular democratic polity.

Also, while some may crib about his standing up when the RSS flag was hoisted and its anthem played (as common decency demanded – and it does not detract from his beliefs and practice; what else should he have done?) he also stood out: wearing an Indian dress of dhoti and achkan, rather than shirt and trousers, and standing with hands by his sides rather than offering the RSS salute of one arm raised across the chest. He was being nice, not submissive or obsequious.

“India’s national identity emerged from a long-drawn process of confluence and co-existence. The concept of modern India was articulated from various Indian leaders and it was not bound by race or religion,” he said.

He told the RSS workers, who have been hearing their chief talk about Hindu rashtra and Hindu rashtravad,  that India was born through the process of assimilation of waves of people who came and settled here. He also talked about pluralism and tolerance being the soul of India, rejected the idea of defining India on the basis of religion, and talked about the welfare of the people being the welfare of the ruler.

The former president did not praise the Sangh or its activities once. Instead, rejecting the idea of religion or caste-based discrimination, Mukherjee said: “At the heart of this violence is darkness, fear and mistrust. We must free our public discourse from all forms of violence, physical as well as verbal… It is our composite culture that makes us into a nation. India’s nationhood is not one language, one religion, one entity.”

He was giving out a very clear message to the RSS, from its own precincts. If the Congress fails to build on this, it has its own incompetence to blame, rather than criticise Mukherjee to give a chance to RSS to claim wider acceptance and legitimacy.[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1528461598573{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-right: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;padding-left: 10px !important;background-color: #a2b1bf !important;border-radius: 10px !important;}”]While Mukherjee’s critics failed to take further what he had said to use it as a starting point against RSS, the fears they expressed – of RSS using his visit to claim wider acceptance and legitimacy through misrepresentation and propaganda – became a self-fulfilling prophecy.

A mainstream newspaper ascribed to Mukherjee words he never uttered to say “President Pranab Mukherjee said on Thursday that political untouchability is not a solution to ideological differences.” This was a derivation employing the term used by BJP and RSS leaders (untouchability’). Mukherjee had said, as the daily went on to quote, that “A dialogue is necessary not only to balance the competing interests but also to reconcile them.”

Moreover, hours after his speech at the RSS headquarters in Nagpur, a morphed picture of former President Pranab Mukherjee surfaced on social media. In the photo, he is seen raising his hand up to his chest in the RSS way of salutation along with leaders of the organisation. In reality, Mukehrjee had stood in attention.

Pranab Mukherjee at RSS HQ proves detractors wrong, teaches idea of India

The image prompted his daughter and Congress leader Sharmistha Mukherjee to say that as she had feared and cautioned her father against, the “dirty tricks department” of the BJP-RSS was at work in full swing.

“See, this is exactly what I was fearing and warned my father about. Not even few hours have passed, but BJP/RSS dirty tricks dept is at work in full swing!” she said, retweeting a tweet showing the “morphed” picture of Pranab Mukherjee performing the RSS salute along with its leaders in Nagpur.

Ms Mukherjee had on Thursday said her father was giving the BJP and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh a handle to plant false stories.

“Hope @CitiznMukherjee now realises from todays’ incident, how BJP dirty tricks dept operates. Even RSS wouldn’t believe that u r going 2 endorse its views in ur speech. But the speech will be forgotten, visuals will remain & those will be circulated with fake statements,” the former President’s daughter tweeted.

By going 2 Nagpur, u r giving BJP/RSS full handle 2 plant false stories, spread falls rumours as 2day & making it somewhat believable. And this is just d beginning! 2/2[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html css=”.vc_custom_1528461172045{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-right: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;padding-left: 10px !important;background-color: #a2b1bf !important;border-radius: 10px !important;}”]JTNDYmxvY2txdW90ZSUyMGNsYXNzJTNEJTIydHdpdHRlci10d2VldCUyMiUyMGRhdGEtbGFuZyUzRCUyMmVuJTIyJTNFJTNDcCUyMGxhbmclM0QlMjJlbiUyMiUyMGRpciUzRCUyMmx0ciUyMiUzRS4lM0NhJTIwaHJlZiUzRCUyMmh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGdHdpdHRlci5jb20lMkZDaXRpem5NdWtoZXJqZWUlM0ZyZWZfc3JjJTNEdHdzcmMlMjU1RXRmdyUyMiUzRSU0MENpdGl6bk11a2hlcmplZSUzQyUyRmElM0UlMjBCeSUyMGdvaW5nJTIwMiUyME5hZ3B1ciUyQyUyMHUlMjByJTIwZ2l2aW5nJTIwQkpQJTJGUlNTJTIwZnVsbCUyMGhhbmRsZSUyMDIlMjBwbGFudCUyMGZhbHNlJTIwc3RvcmllcyUyQyUyMHNwcmVhZCUyMGZhbGxzJTIwcnVtb3VycyUyMGFzJTIwMmRheSUyMCUyNmFtcCUzQiUyMG1ha2luZyUyMGl0JTIwc29tZXdoYXQlMjBiZWxpZXZhYmxlLiUyMEFuZCUyMHRoaXMlMjBpcyUyMGp1c3QlMjBkJTIwYmVnaW5uaW5nJTIxJTIwMiUyRjIlM0MlMkZwJTNFJTI2bWRhc2glM0IlMjBTaGFybWlzdGhhJTIwTXVraGVyamVlJTIwJTI4JTQwU2hhcm1pc3RoYV9HSyUyOSUyMCUzQ2ElMjBocmVmJTNEJTIyaHR0cHMlM0ElMkYlMkZ0d2l0dGVyLmNvbSUyRlNoYXJtaXN0aGFfR0slMkZzdGF0dXMlMkYxMDA0MzgwNjgyNzEyMzM0MzM2JTNGcmVmX3NyYyUzRHR3c3JjJTI1NUV0ZnclMjIlM0VKdW5lJTIwNiUyQyUyMDIwMTglM0MlMkZhJTNFJTNDJTJGYmxvY2txdW90ZSUzRSUwQSUzQ3NjcmlwdCUyMGFzeW5jJTIwc3JjJTNEJTIyaHR0cHMlM0ElMkYlMkZwbGF0Zm9ybS50d2l0dGVyLmNvbSUyRndpZGdldHMuanMlMjIlMjBjaGFyc2V0JTNEJTIydXRmLTglMjIlM0UlM0MlMkZzY3JpcHQlM0UlMEE=[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1528461200345{padding-top: 10px !important;padding-right: 10px !important;padding-bottom: 10px !important;padding-left: 10px !important;background-color: #a2b1bf !important;border-radius: 10px !important;}”]Her warnings came soon after rumours about her joining the BJP came up ahead of Mr Mukherjee’s visit to Nagpur. She dismissed the “rumours” of her joining the BJP as “false” and alleged they were the handiwork of the BJP’s “dirty tricks department”.

She said she would rather leave politics than quit the Congress.[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]Fortunately, the official press conference by Congress immediately after Mukherjee’s speech was more or less in keeping with the spirit of what he said. The party said his speech is a “lesson in true Indian philosophy” and asked if the Sangh will accept the “sagacious advice” that pluralism is central to Indian nationalism.

Congress spokesman Randeep Surjewala asked, “Does RSS now agree to follow constitutional patriotism, tolerance and secularism? Let RSS and BJP today publicly commit to change its character and thought process, and accept the sagacious advice of its guest.”

The party said Mukherjee’s speech was a lesson in ‘Raj Dharma” to PM Narendra Modi. At the same time, it did not seem to agree with Mukherjee’s remarks that public engagement and dialogue can reconcile differences, questioning the Sangh’s mindset. It reiterated its long held view that the Sangh had ducked participation in the freedom struggle.

“Mukherjee taught a glowing lesson to RSS from its own stage. He tried to remove the cobwebs of parochialism from the minds of RSS. He held a mirror to RSS and tried to tell it that India lives in its diversity, non-violence and tolerance,” Surjewala said.

“We believe in democratic dialogue across different thought processes. However, dialogue is possible only with those who have open mind and are willing to change…” Surjewala said. He added, “But there are some basic truths. RSS opposed the freedom struggle, called it pseudo-nationalism. It never believed in India’s diversity. Nathuram Godse was closely associated with RSS.”

Congress general secretary Digvijay Singh tweeted: “Pranab Da has tried to “Beard the Lion in his own den”. Let’s see if they take his advice seriously or it was just a Photo Op for them.”

Historian Ramachandra Guha said in a tweet: “Mohan Bhagwat’s unitary and homogenising nationalism has been shamed by Pranab Mukherjee’s catholic and broad-minded understanding of what it means to be an Indian. Mukherjee dwells on the significance of our Constitution, a document Bhagwat would not or could not mention.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Azmi alleges threat to life after suspension from Maharashtra Assembly

Abu Azmi has claimed that his suspension from the Maharashtra Assembly is unfair and that he and his family are facing threats. The decision has sparked a political debate.

Published

on

SP MLA Abu Azmi addressing the media post-suspension

Samajwadi Party MLA Abu Azmi has alleged threats to his life and family after being suspended from the Maharashtra Assembly for the entire duration of the ongoing budget session. The suspension was imposed following his remarks on Mughal emperor Aurangzeb, which sparked controversy within the House.

Taking to social media platform X, Azmi called the decision “arbitrary” and accused the government of silencing elected representatives. He stated, “My suspension is arbitrary on the part of the government. There is a threat to my life and that of my family. Two laws are in force in Maharashtra. If democracy has ended in Maharashtra, then the government can do anything to the public and elected representatives.”

Azmi expresses disappointment over the decision

Prior to this, Azmi had expressed his disappointment over the suspension and mentioned that he was willing to withdraw his remarks for the smooth functioning of the Assembly. “To ensure that the House functions, I spoke about withdrawing my statement. I did not say anything wrong. Still, there is a controversy, and the proceedings of the House are being stalled,” he said.

He also clarified that his controversial remarks were made outside the Assembly and not during the House proceedings. Despite his attempts to clarify, the Maharashtra Assembly Speaker upheld the suspension.

Akhilesh Yadav comes out in support

Samajwadi Party Chief and former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav condemned the suspension, calling it a violation of freedom of expression. “If the basis of suspension starts getting influenced by ideology, then what difference will there be between freedom of expression and subjection?” Yadav questioned.

He further added that such actions would not deter party leaders, stating, “If some people think that by ‘suspension’ one can rein them in, then this is the childishness of their negative thinking.”

Speaker justifies suspension over ‘objectionable’ remarks

Maharashtra Assembly Speaker Rahul Narwekar announced the suspension of Abu Azmi on Wednesday, following a proposal introduced against him in the House. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Chandrakant Patil asserted that Azmi’s remarks had hurt the dignity of the Assembly, prompting the move.

Azmi had reportedly stated that Aurangzeb was not a “cruel administrator” and that he had “built many temples.” He also claimed that the conflict between Aurangzeb and Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj was about state administration rather than a Hindu-Muslim issue.

The decision to suspend Azmi has triggered a political debate, with supporters questioning the fairness of the move while the ruling government defends it as necessary to uphold the decorum of the House.

Continue Reading

Latest Politics News

RJD slams Nitish Kumar after Bihar CM says he made Lalu Yadav

The RJD has consistently criticized the JD(U)-led government for its handling of unemployment, education, and healthcare, among other concerns.

Published

on

Rajya Sabha MP and Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Manoj Jha on Wednesday took a sharp dig at Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, sarcastically referring to him as the “creator of the universe” and “Brahma.” Jha’s remarks came a day after Kumar engaged in a heated exchange in the Bihar Assembly, where he claimed credit for elevating RJD patriarch Lalu Prasad Yadav in the state’s politics.

During the Assembly session on Tuesday, Nitish Kumar had targeted Tejashwi Yadav, the leader of the opposition and Lalu Prasad’s son, stating, “What was in Bihar before? I made your father. When he entered politics, there was nothing in Bihar at the time.” Kumar also claimed that even members of Lalu’s caste opposed his rise, but he supported him nonetheless. “Even people from your caste were asking me why I was doing this, but I still supported him,” Kumar said.

Responding to Kumar’s comments, Manoj Jha expressed concern over the Chief Minister’s tone and language. Speaking to ANI, Jha said, “I am worried about Nitish Kumar now. It is so unfortunate that he is using such language. You (Nitish Kumar) were in Lalu ji’s team, you were called Lalu ji’s man.”

Jha defended Tejashwi Yadav’s speech in the Assembly, stating that the RJD leader had presented a logical and comprehensive analysis of Bihar’s contemporary challenges and future prospects. “Yesterday, Tejashwi Yadav, without any bitterness, gave a historical analysis, contemporary challenges, and an outline of the future. He explained everything based on logic… You (Nitish Kumar) did not answer it… You are the creator of the universe, you are Brahma. If such thoughts are coming to your mind these days, then I am even more worried about you,” Jha added.

The RJD leader’s sarcastic remarks highlight the growing tension between the ruling Janata Dal (United) and the opposition RJD in Bihar. Earlier on Tuesday, Tejashwi Yadav had compared the governance of his father, Lalu Prasad Yadav, with that of Nitish Kumar, criticizing the current administration’s policies and performance.

Tejashwi also slammed the budget presented by the Nitish Kumar government, accusing it of failing to address the state’s pressing issues. The RJD has consistently criticized the JD(U)-led government for its handling of unemployment, education, and healthcare, among other concerns.

The war of words between the two political heavyweights underscores the deepening rift in Bihar’s political landscape. As the state gears up for future elections, the verbal sparring between Nitish Kumar and the RJD leadership is likely to intensify, with both sides vying to assert their influence and credibility.

Manoj Jha’s jibe at Nitish Kumar as the “creator of the universe” reflects the RJD’s strategy to portray the Chief Minister as out of touch with reality, while Kumar’s claims about Lalu Prasad’s rise aim to reinforce his own political legacy. The ongoing political drama in Bihar continues to captivate the state’s electorate, setting the stage for a fierce electoral battle in the coming months.

Continue Reading

India News

Ramdas Athawale invites Akash Anand to join Republican Party of India after BSP expulsion

After Mayawati expelled her nephew Akash Anand from BSP, RPI chief Ramdas Athawale extended an invitation to him, stating it would strengthen their party’s presence in Uttar Pradesh.

Published

on

Ramdas Athawale offers Akash Anand to join RPI

Republican Party of India (A) chief Ramdas Athawale has extended an invitation to Akash Anand, the expelled nephew of Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) chief Mayawati, to join his party. Athawale stated that if Anand is committed to carrying forward the mission of Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar, he would be welcomed into the Republican Party of India (RPI), which would further strengthen the party’s presence in Uttar Pradesh.

“If he (Akash Anand) wants to take forward the mission of Baba Saheb Bhimrao Ambedkar, he should join the Republican Party of India. If he joins the party, the Republican Party of India will get more strength in UP,” Athawale remarked.

Mayawati expels Akash Anand, calls his response ‘selfish and arrogant’

On Monday, Mayawati expelled Akash Anand from the BSP, stating that his reaction after being relieved from his duties was immature and self-centered. The BSP supremo accused him of being heavily influenced by his father-in-law, Ashok Siddharth, who was also ousted from the party.

“In the interest of the self-respect and self-esteem movement of the most revered Babasaheb Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar and following the tradition of discipline of the venerable Kanshiram, Akash Anand, like his father-in-law, is expelled from the party in the interest of the party and the movement,” Mayawati posted on X.

She criticized Anand’s response as lacking political maturity and suggested that he should have gracefully accepted his removal.

Akash Anand stands firm despite expulsion

Despite his removal from all key positions, Akash Anand expressed his unwavering commitment to the ideals of the Bahujan Movement. He stated that his involvement in politics is not a mere career but a fight for the dignity and rights of marginalized communities.

Following his expulsion, Anand termed the decision an emotional one but reaffirmed his dedication to the cause. “The test is difficult,” he said, implying that he would continue his political journey despite the setback.

With Ramdas Athawale’s offer now on the table, the political future of Akash Anand remains uncertain, but his next move could significantly impact the Dalit political landscape in Uttar Pradesh.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com