English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest Politics News

Rafale deal: Supreme Court postpones review petition hearing to May 10

Published

on

Rafale deal: Supreme Court postpones review petition hearing to May 10

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The Supreme Court today (Monday, May 6) adjourned to May 10 the hearing of petitions seeking review of its December 14, 2018 verdict giving clean chit to Narendra Modi government.

The postponement of the hearing scheduled today came after the Court learnt that the hearing in the contempt case against Congress chief Rahul Gandhi – forattributing the ‘chowkidar chorhai’ remark to the top court – hadbeen segregated and posted for that date although the court had said both here to be heard together.

Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi said on Monday that he was perplexed that the two matters were not listed together and carry different dates while they were ordered to be heard together.

The matter will be heard on the day before the top court’s summer recess.

The top court had on April 10 dismissed objections over the admissibility of leaked documents petitioners had cited for seeking a review of its judgement from December last year rejecting a plea for a court-monitored probe into the purchase of the 36 fighter jets.

Petitioners had challenged the verdict upholding India’s deal with France after two media houses — The Hindu and ANI — published ‘leaked’ documents related to the deal for 36 fighter aircraft.

The review petitions have been filed by former Union ministers Yashwant Sinha and Arun Shourie in the Rafale case claiming the December 18 verdict in the case contained errors and relied on the government’s incorrect claims in an unsigned note given in a sealed cover.AamAadmi Party leader Sanjay Singh and lawyer Vineet Dhanda, too, have filed two more review petitions.

The Narendra Modi government had vehemently opposed the inclusion of these documents, saying they are “incomplete internal file notings procured unauthorisedly and illegally”, and that “the petitioners are attempting to bring out internal processing of this Government to Government procurement and trying to present a selective and incomplete picture of the same”.

Also Read: Cong says EC clean chits to Modi, Shah do not state reasons; SC asks it to place them on record

In its affidavit filed last Saturday, the Centre said any review in the case would tantamount to questioning the government’s sovereign decision-related to national security and defence.

The government said the claims made in the review petitions are “scandalous, false, baseless and bereft of any particular material”. The affidavit said the ruling had no apparent “error warranting its review”.

It said the Prime Minister’s Office monitoring the progress of the deal for 36 Rafale jets could not be “construed as interference or parallel negotiations”.

The Centre said media reports cannot form the basis for seeking review of the judgement since it is well settled law that courts do not take decision on the basis of media reports.

Referring to the April 10 order of the apex court, by which the Centre’s preliminary objection to placing reliance on leaked documents was rejected by the top court, the Centre’s reply said the order “would imply that any document marked secret obtained by whatever means and placed in public domain can be used without attracting any penal action”.

The contempt case against Rahul Gandhi has been filed by the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP’s) Meenakshi Lekhi for incorrectly attributing the slogan to the preliminary verdict of the top court on admissibility of documents in the Rafale case. Lekhi had asked the court to initiate criminal contempt action against Gandhi for twisting the top court’s April 10 judgment to claim that the court declared Prime Minister Narendra Modi guilty of corrupt practices in purchase of the Rafale aircraft.

Gandhi had apologised for misquoting the Supreme Court at the previous hearing. The court, however, had asked him to give a written apology and was not convinced by Gandhi’s earlier affidavit.

Also Read: Police arrest around 200 men, women from Noida rave party

The three-judge SC Bench, also comprising Justice KM Joseph and SK Kaul, insisted that the hearing of both cases – review petition and contempt case – willbe held together and adjourned the matter. May 10 is the last day before the Supreme Court breaks for summer recess.

During the brief hearing, advocate Prashant Bhushan told the bench that he would argue the review pleas as well as an application seeking production of certain documents.

He said the court should allow his co-petitioner and former Union minister Arun Shourie to argue a separate application seeking perjury action against unknown government servants for allegedly misleading the court during the Rafale case hearing earlier.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Congress high command steps in to resolve Karnataka leadership impasse with crucial Delhi meeting

The Congress leadership, including Mallikarjun Kharge and Rahul Gandhi, is holding a vital meeting in Delhi with Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah to find a definitive solution to the state’s prolonged leadership impasse.

Published

on

The top leadership of the Congress party is scheduled to hold a high-level meeting at its headquarters in the national capital today morning to address the long-standing leadership dispute in Karnataka. Senior leaders, including party president Mallikarjun Kharge and MP Rahul Gandhi, will lead the discussions aimed at resolving the continuous friction between Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar.

The ongoing power struggle over the state’s top position has persisted since the party’s electoral victory in 2023. For the current session, only Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has been called to join the discussions in Delhi. When questioned about the agenda by reporters, the Chief Minister stated that he was unaware of the specific subjects to be discussed, noting that political speculation is inevitable.

Background of the internal division

The internal friction intensified significantly in November 2025 when the state government completed its two-and-a-half-year mark in office. Supporters of the Deputy Chief Minister pointed to a purported unacknowledged internal arrangement suggesting a rotational chief ministership split equally across the five-year term. Despite multiple prior interventions by central party leadership to manage the internal friction, a permanent resolution has remained elusive.

While Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar has not been invited to this morning’s initial session, indications suggest that separate individual discussions and a potential joint meeting involving both leaders are planned as part of the broader resolution process. Observers note that several state ministers and legislators have also traveled to the national capital as the party leadership aims to settle the administrative roadmap and finalise leadership plans before the next assembly elections.

Continue Reading

India News

No uniform civil code provisions will be imposed on tribals, clarifies Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah has assured tribal communities that the proposed Uniform Civil Code will not interfere with their customs, urging them not to be misled by misinformation.

Published

on

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Sunday declared that the proposed Uniform Civil Code (UCC) will not impact tribal populations in any manner. He called upon the community to stay vigilant against “conspiracies” and misinformation circulating on the subject.

Addressing the Janjati Sanskritik Samagam—a tribal conclave organized by the Janjati Suraksha Manch at the Red Fort grounds to mark the 150th birth anniversary year of Birsa Munda—Shah stated that specific provisions have been implemented in states ruled by the ruling party to exclude tribal communities from the scope of the code.

Clarification on customs and traditions

The Home Minister highlighted that a deliberate narrative has emerged suggesting the proposed legislation would strip tribal societies of their distinct culture, traditions, and customary lifestyles.

He explicitly clarified that the central government has no intention of forcing UCC regulations upon tribal or Vanvasi communities. Shah pointed out that where regional administrations have initiated the code, care has been taken by the leadership to ensure that indigenous populations remain fully outside its jurisdiction. He requested attendees to disseminate this assurance deeply into forest zones and rural villages to erase lingering apprehensions.

Focus on security and community development

Beyond the legislative framework, Shah detailed the progress made toward curbing internal security threats, stating that the nation is steadily advancing toward eradicating Naxalism entirely. He noted that violent disruptions had severely restricted progress in these belts for decades, leading to the loss of thousands of tribal lives. According to the minister, regional stability will now pave the way for accelerated development across remote hills and forests.

The address also covered constitutional rights regarding personal faith. Shah mentioned that the original framework of the Constitution grants every citizen the dignity to practice their traditional beliefs without facing coercion, temptation, or material inducement for religious conversion.

Reflecting on financial allocations, the minister criticized earlier political administrations for keeping tribal welfare funding low. He underscored that the current administration under Prime Minister Narendra Modi significantly elevated the dedicated tribal budget from a previous Rs 28,000 crore to Rs 1.54 lakh crore. Terming the vast gathering a historical movement for cultural preservation, Shah described the societal awakening as a major step toward safeguarding tribal heritage for future generations.

Continue Reading

India News

Karnataka withdraws 42 criminal cases including 2022 Aland Dargah clashes, sparks massive BJP backlash

The Congress-led Karnataka government has cleared the withdrawal of 42 criminal cases, including those linked to the 2022 Aland Dargah clashes, drawing intense fire from the BJP over allegations of encouraging violent elements.

Published

on

The Congress-led Karnataka government has officially cleared the withdrawal of 42 criminal cases, including several sensitive cases tied to the 2022 communal clashes at the Ladle Mashak Dargah in Aland town, Kalaburagi district. The decision has triggered an intense political confrontation, with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) launching a fierce attack against the ruling administration.

Aland Dargah Clashes Under Focus

A major portion of the dropped cases involves 13 specific files connected to the communal violence that erupted in 2022. The tension originally ignited following allegations that a Shivling located inside the disputed Ladle Mashak Dargah premises had been desecrated. The situation rapidly escalated into large-scale unrest when a group of Hindu activists made attempts to enter the dargah to clean the structure.

During the ensuing rioting, extensive damage was inflicted on public and private property. Several vehicles were completely vandalised, including official transport vehicles used by high-ranking political figures such as Union Minister Bhagwanth Khuba and the Kalaburagi Deputy Commissioner.

Overruling Departmental and Legal Objections

According to internal sources, the state home department had initially strongly resisted the move to drop the riot-related cases. The department cited highly adverse legal opinions and expressed deep reservations regarding the suspension of prosecution in matters of sensitive communal violence.

Despite these departmental objections and legal warnings, a specialized Cabinet sub-committee reviewed and subsequently approved the withdrawal of the cases. The recommendation was then fast-tracked to the state Cabinet, which formally ratified and cleared the final decision.

“Encouraging Violent Elements,” Alleges BJP

The opposition BJP reacted sharply to the development, accusing the government of actively fostering lawlessness. Speaking on the decision, BJP spokesperson S. Prakash noted that this marks the third instance where the Congress administration has stepped in to drop severe criminal cases across the state.

“Cases linked to rioting and attempts to burn police stations were also withdrawn earlier,” Prakash stated, emphasizing that prior state actions of a similar nature had been legally contested and stayed by courts. He added that the administration has failed to learn any lessons from past judicial interventions.

The opposition spokesperson went on to allege that the decision was heavily influenced by senior party leadership, pointing toward pressure from leaders like Priyank Kharge or Mallikarjun Kharge. He claimed that by repeatedly withdrawing such cases, the government is effectively encouraging fringe elements to continue executing violence without fear of legal consequences.

State Government Stands Firm on Review Process

Defending the executive action, Karnataka Home Minister G Parameshwara clarified that the decision was neither rushed nor arbitrary. He emphasized that the Cabinet Sub-Committee meticulously reviewed approximately 52 total cases involving various socio-political organizations across the entire state.

“In the Cabinet Sub-Committee, every case was discussed individually to examine whether it could be legally withdrawn,” Parameshwara asserted. He explained that the panel moved forward only after establishing that there was concrete legal scope to do so. While refusing to delve deeper into the specific details of the Aland Dargah incident, he stated that the final step was a collective Cabinet decision where all pertinent parameters were fully evaluated.

Slamming the opposition’s narrative, Minister Satish Jarkiholi also stood by the administration’s choice. He noted that the beneficiaries of the 42 dropped cases span across multiple communities and groups, including farmers, local political leaders, and Muslims. Jarkiholi dismissed the BJP’s criticism as a standard, predictable allegation that is routinely leveled whenever such broad administrative reviews take place.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com