[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Panellists welcome Punjab government move to open corridor but say that Pak actions must be watched as it could be used by ISI to stoke Khalistan fires
Vice-President M Venkaiah Naidu on Monday laid the foundation stone for the construction of the Kartarpur corridor, which will provide pilgrims easy passage from Baba Nanak Dera near Amritsar in Punjab to Gurdwara Kartarpur Sahib in Pakistan. The ceremony took place in Mann village of Punjab’s Gurdaspur district. Union ministers Nitin Gadkari and Harsimrat Kaur Badal, and Punjab Chief Minister Amarinder Singh attended as did leaders and workers of the Shiromani Akali Dal.
On the occasion, the Punjab chief minister cautioned Pakistan to stop terror activities. APN’s popular debate Mudda discussed the issue. Anchorperson Anant Tyagi posed questions to panellists including BJP’s Vijay Khera, SP’s Pradeep Singh, foreign affairs expert Dr Shubhra Kamal Dutta, defence expert PK Sehgal, noted scribe Piyush Pant and APN consultant Govind Pant Raju.
Khera said: “It was PM Vajpayee’s dream, and a great honour for Modi to have fulfilled it.”
Pant said: “It’s a good development and will help improve ties between Pakistan and India. Amarinder Singh (who has said he will not visit Pak) should have used the opportunity for Indian Sikhs.”
Pradeep Singh said: “With Guru Nanak Dev’s blessings, it will help both nations. However, we all need to be guarded.”
Dutta said: “I back Sushma Swaraj’s decision not to go to Pakistan for this. Punjab CM’s decision should also be welcome. However, one must understand that the Lahore bus was also symbolic of peace. India is a peaceful nation, but we can’t say the same about Pakistan. We shall need to see over time how much beneficial this step is.”
Raju said: “It is ironical that this is happening a decade after 26/11. Going back in history, this corridor was part of one nation. This is an effort by the Indian government. I support Amarinder Singh’s views. He is a fauji at heart. Sushma Swaraj’s not going is a diplomatic decision, she is a national leader and so has to respond to the matter diplomatically.”
Sehgal said: “We need to wait and watch what happens next.”
Pant said: “This is not a party programme. This site is as important as Mecca, people should not politicise this. Harsimrat Kaurt is going now but had earlier criticized Siddhu on this”
Anant asked if state minister SS Randhawa, who put black tape on names of colleagues on the plaque, was right in doing so. Raju said: “The objection is right, but the reaction to it is not right.”
Anant wanted to know if the move to put Akali leaders name on the plaque was to get political mileage.
Dutta said: “To have the CM and central ministers’ names on the plaque is alright. The way Siddhu talks, to me he looks like an extended Pakistani citizen. Kapil Dev also got an invitation, but he refused. This corridor issue was raised by Vajpayee; Siddhu has done nothing for this.”
Raju said: “If it’s matter of sports, Gavaskar and Kapil Dev got the invite, and they refused. Siddhu’s behaviour in Pak has been embarrassing. But it is characteristic of him to make populist postures.”
Sehgal said: “Pakistan can use this corridor to destabilise the country. Strict vigil will need to be kept on this corridor. Pak wants a referendum in Punjab on April 20. It might use Indian visitors there to spread propaganda to stoke the fires of Sikh separatism.”
Was the decision taken in a hurry? Anant pointed out NHAI still does not have the layout of the corridor. Khera said: “It is not such a difficult task to construct the corridor.”
Singh said:”If there has been no plan, and the foundation stone has been laid, it is definitely a populist move. After all, we need to watch out for Pak even though we welcome the move.”
Dutta said: “In today’s times, a lot of projects are undertaken with forward planning.”
Khera pointed out that the government has all plans and layout, and with Gadkari at the helm, they are in safe hands.
Raju said:”I don’t see any hurry in going ahead with the corridor. This is not an ordinary road. This joins Pak and India, and I am sure Pak and India must have had prior talks on this, on the ramifications of the road project, where it will terminate and so on. I am sure both governments have complete clarity on this.”
—Compiled by Niti Singh Bhandari
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]