English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Speakers in APN show: Politicians who polarise people should be punished

Published

on

Politicians who polarise people should be punished

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]APN’s Aap ki rai discusses why BJP leaders end up making communally charged statements

At a time when Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath have been reiterating their unhappiness at BJP leaders stoking outrage by making frequent communal statements, certain elements in the party seem to be set upon creating trouble for the party leadership by issuing controversial statements. On Saturday (April 29), Swami Prasad Maurya, the Uttar Pradesh Minister for Cooperatives, has said that Muslims chose triple talaq to satisfy their “lust” by changing wives.

Maurya, who is in Basti, was quoted as saying by ANI, “Koi havas poora karne ke liye lagatar patni badle, bachon-patni ko bheek mangne pe majboor kare ise koi acha nahi kehega. (Just for lust, if someone changes his wife or forces children to beg then no one would appreciate it).

Similarly, another minister Satyadev Pachauri was caught using  derogatory language for a physically disabled contractual employee during a surprise inspection at the Divyang Empowerment Department in Lucknow. He was quoted telling his official, “You have kept a loola-langda on contract. What will he do? This is the reason behind lack of hygiene in Lucknow.” Interestingly Yogi government has recently renamed the Viklang Kalyan Vibhag (Handicap Welfare Department) to Divyang Jan Sashaktikaran Vibhag (Divyang Empowerment Department).

Meanwhile in Moradabad, VHP leader Sadhvi Prachi was recently quoted asking Muslim women to leave their religion and say “I love you” to Hindu men, so they can escape triple talaq.

APN ran a half-hour Aap ki rai (your opinion) program on Saturday, to find out people’s views on the frequent communally surcharged controversial statements. It was more focused on Maurya’s comment on lust.Politicians who polarise people should be punished

APN’s Himanshu Dikshit anchored the show. Opinions of political adversaries of the BJP were also included: Juhi Singh of Samajwadi Party, Surjendra Rajput of Congress and Tariq Anwar of Nationalist Congress Party criticised the statements and advised the BJP leadership to behave responsibly.

Shaista Ambar of All India Muslim Women’s Personal Law Board (AIMWPLB) asserted that Swami Prasad Maurya should seek apology, be immediately removed from the cabinet and jailed at the earliest. She said Maurya insulted all women by using abusive language. She said that if  Maurya does not apologise, she may approach the Supreme Court. Maulana Khalid Rasheed Firangi Mahli, Member of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), also criticised the irresponsible behaviour of  BJP leaders for using abusive language.

A large number of viewers called APN studio to express their opinion on how to curb leaders from making irresponsible statements. Callers from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Haryana participated in the show.

Pritam from Varanasi and Jaibhar from Chandigarh expressed suspicion that the abusive statements were part of a BJP conspiracy. Jaibhar was of the opinion that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath were not taking action against the fringe elements. He considered the BJP leadership might be internally encouraging such statements.

Nand Kishore from Madhya Pradesh alleged that these statements were part of vote politics. In his opinion, such ministers should be immediately removed from the cabinet.

Ahmed from Barabanki, Saleem from Bihar, Suhail from Faridabad, Waris from Lakhimpur Kheri and Israr from Kolkata were unanimous in demanding stern action against such irresponsible elements who were trying to polarise people. They asked Prime Minister Modi, Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and other senior BJP leaders to take stern action for maintaining harmony in the country.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com