India Under-19 rode on a breathtaking century from Vaibhav Suryavanshi to seize complete control of the ICC Under-19 World Cup 2026 final against England at the Harare Sports Club on Thursday.

Suryavanshi’s extraordinary innings came to an end in the 26th over, when he was dismissed for 175 off just 80 balls. As he walked back to the pavilion, the England players applauded the teenager, acknowledging one of the most remarkable knocks in the tournament’s history.

The right-hander’s innings was studded with 15 fours and 15 sixes, showcasing fearless strokeplay on the biggest stage. His knock has put India firmly on track to post a total well in excess of 400.

Fastest century in a U19 World Cup final

Suryavanshi reached his century in just 55 balls, setting a new record for the fastest hundred in a U19 World Cup final. He later became the first batter ever to score 150 or more runs in the summit clash, reaching the milestone in only 71 deliveries.

The 14-year-old also finished the innings as the highest run-scorer of the tournament, surpassing the previous record held by Afghanistan’s Faisal Shinwari.

At the time of his dismissal, India were cruising at 251 for three in 25.3 overs, with the scoring rate soaring above nine runs per over.

Strong support from the middle order

Before Suryavanshi’s dismissal, India captain Ayush Mhatre also played a key role with a fluent half-century, ensuring there was no let-up in momentum. England struggled to contain the Indian batters as boundaries flowed freely across the ground.

With wickets in hand and plenty of overs remaining, India remain well placed to post a record total in the final.

The match is currently in progress.

Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Wednesday reaffirmed his government’s decision to boycott the country’s T20 World Cup match against India, stating that Islamabad has taken a “clear stand” on the issue.

Addressing the federal cabinet in Islamabad, Sharif said Pakistan would not take the field against India for the scheduled February 15 match in Sri Lanka. He added that the decision was made after careful assessment and described it as an appropriate step.

“There should be no politics in sports,” the prime minister said, adding that the stance was final after due deliberation.

ICC flags issue of selective participation

Pakistan’s position follows an earlier statement by the government, shared on social media, indicating that the national team would not play the group-stage match against India. No specific reason was cited in that post.

Reacting to the development, the International Cricket Council (ICC) said selective participation goes against the core principles of global sporting events. In a statement, the ICC noted the Government of Pakistan’s position and said it was awaiting official communication from the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB).

The ICC said tournaments are built on fairness, consistency, and sporting integrity, and selective participation undermines the spirit of international competition. It added that while governments have their own policy considerations, such decisions are not in the interest of the global game or fans worldwide.

The governing body urged the PCB to explore a mutually acceptable resolution that safeguards the interests of all stakeholders and ensures the successful conduct of the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026.

Bangladesh replacement and wider context

The issue comes amid recent developments involving other teams. The ICC had announced last month that Scotland would replace Bangladesh in the T20 World Cup after the Bangladesh Cricket Board refused to participate as per the published schedule.

The decision followed the ICC’s rejection of Bangladesh’s request to move its matches out of India, citing the absence of any credible or verifiable security threat. Scotland, currently ranked 14th in T20 Internationals, was named as the replacement being the highest-ranked team not originally qualified.

India-Pakistan rivalry record

Pakistan and India have faced each other eight times in ICC T20 World Cups, with India holding a dominant 7-1 record. In last year’s Asia Cup, India also defeated Pakistan in a series of matches, including the final.

The T20 World Cup 2026 will be hosted by India and Sri Lanka from February 7 to March 8. Pakistan have been placed in Group A alongside India, Namibia, the Netherlands, and the United States.

Pakistan’s declaration that it will not take the field against India at the T20 World Cup has pushed the tournament into an unusual and sensitive situation, with ICC playing conditions clearly outlining the sporting consequences of a refusal.

Matches between India and Pakistan carry political significance, but under World Cup regulations, the procedural outcome of a team declining to play is largely unambiguous. If India arrive in Colombo as scheduled, attend training and fulfil all pre-match formalities, the onus rests entirely on Pakistan.

Should Pakistan then refuse to take the field, the fixture would be officially forfeited. India would be awarded two points, while Pakistan would receive none. The forfeiture would also negatively affect Pakistan’s net run rate, a factor that has frequently proven decisive in tightly contested World Cup group stages.

Net run rate impact could prove costly

A forfeit is not treated as a neutral outcome under ICC rules. In a competitive tournament environment, the loss of points combined with a dent to net run rate can have long-term implications, potentially influencing qualification for the semi-finals.

There is only one alternative scenario outlined under the regulations. If India do not travel to the venue, the match would be considered cancelled rather than forfeited, resulting in points being shared by both teams. However, with India expected to meet all logistical and operational requirements, that possibility currently appears unlikely.

Past precedents at ICC events

While forfeitures at World Cups are rare, they are not unprecedented. During the 1996 ODI World Cup, Australia and the West Indies declined to play matches in Sri Lanka following a bomb blast in Colombo, resulting in Sri Lanka being awarded full points.

In the 2003 ODI World Cup, England forfeited their match against Zimbabwe in Harare citing political and security concerns, while New Zealand refused to play Kenya in Nairobi due to safety considerations.

More recent ICC events have also seen withdrawals, including Zimbabwe pulling out of the 2009 T20 World Cup and New Zealand’s Under-19 team exiting the 2022 Under-19 World Cup because of COVID-19 restrictions. In such cases, the ICC has consistently prioritised the integrity of the tournament framework.

Can force majeure apply?

Pakistan’s potential reliance on a force majeure clause forms the crux of the legal debate. Force majeure traditionally applies to unforeseen and unavoidable circumstances such as natural disasters or extreme situations that make participation impossible rather than undesirable.

According to ICC sources, invoking force majeure in this case would be difficult. Such clauses are interpreted narrowly, and political objections alone do not automatically qualify unless there is a demonstrable and immediate threat to safety or feasibility. Without meeting that threshold, a refusal to play would fall outside force majeure protections.

Beyond the immediate match

The implications may extend beyond the scorecard. ICC sources indicate that severe sanctions, including the possibility of suspension, could be considered if a refusal is deemed a breach of participation obligations. Any such action would follow due process rather than being immediate, but precedent exists for firm intervention when competition rules are undermined.

For now, the impact remains primarily sporting. India stand to gain two crucial points without play, while Pakistan risk compromising both their World Cup campaign and their standing within the ICC framework.

What was expected to be the tournament’s most watched fixture could instead become its most consequential non-match, shaped not by runs or wickets but by regulations that leave little room for interpretation.