English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Cricket news

Who is at the Crease?

Published

on

Ravi Shastri

By Sujit Bhar

Following a chaotic few evening hours on Tuesday (July 11), it was confirmed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India’s (BCCI) Acting Secretary Amitabh Choudhary that Ravi Shastri would be the next head coach of the Indian cricket team.

The Board’s media advisory said: “The BCCI announces the appointment of Mr Ravi Shastri as the Head Coach, Mr Zaheer Khan as the Bowling Consultant and Mr Rahul Dravid who will be the Overseas Batting Consultant (Test cricket) for the Indian Cricket Team.”

The appointments will be till the World Cup of 2019.

So far so good, but there seem to be a number of attendant problems. When did the Board decide to appoint a Bowling Consultant and an overseas Overseas Batting Consultant (Test cricket)? And if it did, why was it not advertised and applications invited?

The second problem is of law. Does the Cricket Advisory Committee (CAC) of the BCCI, or even the Board itself, retain full powers to ask for applications for such important posts? Does it have the requisite authority of related tendering processes? The problem arises from the Supreme Court’s appointing the Committee of Administrators (CoA) with full authority to oversee every action of the Board and its sub-committees, such as the CAC.

The CoA’s ability to push decisions within the Board was visible on Tuesday (July 11) when its chief, former Comptroller and Auditor General Vinod Rai, insisted that the coach be named on Tuesday itself. That was not what the CAC had planned. The Board had given the CAC full authority to choose the coach. And with good reason, what with the CAC comprising such names such as Sourav Ganguly, Sachin Tendulkar and VVS Laxman.

The CAC had done its homework and its interviews, but still wanted to interview skipper Virat Kohli, holidaying in America. Sourav had said that he had great respect for Kohli and it (talking to him for his views) would be the right thing to do, but it would not be nice to call him on his holiday.

Rai was insistent, though. So Kohli was called and the announcement was made.

The CAC did hold its own view. Sourav has been against the appointment of Shastri and Laxman has been supportive of that view, though neither had said it openly. A vote within the CAC would have yielded the expected result. It is not known if there was unanimity of opinion within the Committee.

As for the CoA, one has to remember it is fractured at the moment.

On June 1, the Supreme Court received a letter from historian and cricket buff Ramachandra Guha, stating that he was quitting from the CoA. This letter, dated March 28, contained detailed explanation on why he was quitting, and one of the main issues was the way Anil Kumble, the former India coach, was handled. It is a different matter that both Guha and Kumble hail from Bengaluru, and there is a good bit of bonhomie around. Guha’s resignation letter is pending with the apex court, which will take a call on it on July 14.

The very nature of the CoA and its powers need to be better explained to the Board. Apart from Rai and Guha, the CoA also has former international cricketer and India captain Diana Edulji and IDFC Ltd Managing Director and CEO Vikram Limaye. While the CoA’s primary function was to carry out the Lodha Commission’s recommendations in reforming the sport in the country, who carries out the day-to-day running of the sport? If that is the responsibility Board, then it was the Board’s and therefore of the CAC’s responsibility to announce the name of the coach after due process.

So who is selecting the coach of the Indian cricket team? The basis of the CoA is to delegate a certain amount of power to the BCCI till things are set in perspective when the functioning of the CoA would become redundant. At this point, it seems the CoA has the authority to decide on something that is within cricket’s deep understanding.

This complexity needs to be sorted out. Also the need of the hour is ascertaining the responsibilities and powers of the individual members of the CoA. Guha has probably not done the administration any good by sending in his resignation and by not contesting whatever he thinks are wrong from within.

The coach selection issue brings too many anomalies into the open. These are key issues that need sorting out in quick time, before another Kumble-like incident arises.

Cricket news

India’s T20 World Cup triumph validates Gautam Gambhir’s approach, coach dedicates win to Dravid and Laxman

Gautam Gambhir said he is accountable only to the team dressing room after India defeated New Zealand by 96 runs to win the 2026 T20 World Cup and dedicated the title to Rahul Dravid and VVS Laxman.

Published

on

Gautam Gambhir (1)

India’s victory in the 2026 T20 World Cup has become a moment of redemption for head coach Gautam Gambhir, who had faced heavy criticism after a series of Test defeats earlier in his tenure.

India defeated New Zealand national cricket team by 96 runs in the final to clinch their third T20 World Cup title, becoming the first team to achieve the feat. The win also marked the first time a team successfully defended the trophy after lifting it in the previous edition.

Gambhir says accountability lies within the dressing room

Speaking after the final, Gambhir said he does not measure his work based on public opinion or social media reactions.

“My accountability is not for people on social media. My accountability is to those 30 people in that change room,” Gambhir said during the post-match press conference.

The former India opener added that a coach’s success ultimately depends on the players.

“A coach is as good as his team. Players made me the coach I am,” he said.

Trophy dedicated to Dravid and Laxman

Despite celebrating a major triumph, Gambhir chose to acknowledge the contributions of two former India greats — Rahul Dravid and VVS Laxman.

Dravid had guided India to the T20 World Cup title in 2024 before Gambhir took over the role, while Laxman currently heads the BCCI’s Centre of Excellence.

“I would dedicate this trophy to Rahul Dravid and VVS Laxman. To Rahul bhai for putting the Indian team in a place and Laxman for creating the pipeline at the CoE,” Gambhir said.

He also expressed gratitude to chief selector Ajit Agarkar and ICC chairman Jay Shah, recalling their support during difficult phases.

“Ajit Agarkar took a lot of flak and worked with honesty. And Jay bhai called me during my lowest ebb after the losses to New Zealand and South Africa,” he noted.

India dominate final with bat and ball

India produced a commanding performance in the final. Batting first, the team posted a massive total of 255 for five.

Sanju Samson led the charge with a blistering 89, while Abhishek Sharma (52) and Ishan Kishan (54) struck quick half-centuries to put New Zealand under pressure.

Defending the total, India bowled out New Zealand for 159. Jasprit Bumrah starred with figures of 4 for 15, while Axar Patel claimed three wickets.

Suryakumar backs Gambhir’s philosophy

India captain Suryakumar Yadav praised Gambhir’s leadership and said the pair share a strong understanding built during their time at Kolkata Knight Riders.

“I played four years under GG’s captaincy. We have never had arguments because the goal has always been how the team can win,” Suryakumar said.

He also stressed that the team’s focus remains on collective success rather than individual milestones.

Looking ahead, the captain said India would now aim for gold when cricket makes its Olympic appearance at the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics.

Continue Reading

Cricket news

India win record third T20 World Cup after thrashing New Zealand in 2026 final

India defeated New Zealand by 96 runs in the T20 World Cup 2026 final in Ahmedabad, becoming the first team to win the tournament three times and defend the title.

Published

on

india wins worldcup 2026

India scripted history by defeating New Zealand by 96 runs in the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026 final at the Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad on Sunday, becoming the first team to win the tournament three times and also the first to successfully defend the title.

Batting first after being put in, India produced a powerful performance with the bat to post 255 for 5 in 20 overs, the highest total ever recorded in a T20 World Cup final.

Sanju Samson led the charge with an impressive 89, while Abhishek Sharma played a stunning cameo, smashing the fastest half-century of the tournament off just 18 balls. Ishan Kishan added 54 from 25 balls and Shivam Dube provided late momentum with a quick 26 off only eight deliveries.

New Zealand fall short in steep chase

Chasing a daunting target of 256, New Zealand struggled to keep pace with the required run rate and were eventually bowled out for 159 in 19 overs.

Jasprit Bumrah delivered a match-winning spell, taking four wickets while conceding just 15 runs in his four overs. Axar Patel also made a strong impact with three wickets.

With the emphatic victory, India secured their third T20 World Cup title after previous triumphs in 2007 and 2024.

Historic achievement for India

The victory marked several milestones for the Indian team. They became the first side to:

  • Win the T20 World Cup three times
  • Defend the T20 World Cup title
  • Win the tournament on home soil

The triumph also capped a successful era under captain Suryakumar Yadav and head coach Gautam Gambhir, with India continuing their dominance in the shortest format of the game.

Continue Reading

Cricket news

Gautam Gambhir’s tactical calls help India edge past England to reach T20 World Cup final

India defeated England by seven runs in the T20 World Cup 2026 semifinal in Mumbai as tactical decisions and a flexible batting order helped secure a place in the final.

Published

on

India’s flexible approach and tactical decisions under head coach Gautam Gambhir played a key role in the team’s dramatic seven-run win over England in the T20 World Cup 2026 semifinal at Mumbai’s Wankhede Stadium. The victory sealed India’s place in the final, where they will face New Zealand.

A few months earlier, Gambhir had sparked debate by saying batting orders in white-ball cricket are “overrated”. India’s approach in the semifinal reflected that philosophy, with the team using a fluid batting order and specific match-ups to counter England’s bowling plans.

England captain Harry Brook won the toss and chose to bowl first, while India captain Suryakumar Yadav admitted later he would have preferred to bat. India made the most of the opportunity, putting up a huge total that kept pressure on England throughout the chase.

Tactical batting moves disrupt England’s plans

India’s tactical thinking became evident during the innings when Ishan Kishan was dismissed by leg-spinner Adil Rashid in the 10th over. Instead of sending in Suryakumar Yadav, India promoted left-hander Shivam Dube to No. 4.

The move worked effectively against Rashid. While Sanju Samson played cautiously against the leg-spinner, Dube attacked him and scored 22 runs from just eight deliveries, including three sixes. The aggressive approach shifted momentum back in India’s favour.

After Samson’s dismissal, India continued to maintain a left-right combination by sending Hardik Pandya to partner Dube. The strategy ensured England’s bowlers constantly had to adjust their lines and field placements.

The pressure created by the quick scoring forced Brook to reintroduce Jofra Archer earlier than planned. India continued to rotate their batting options based on match situations, even holding Tilak Varma back for the death overs where his ability against pace could be more effective.

Bowling strategy keeps England in check

India’s tactical planning was also visible in the bowling department. Anticipating that the Wankhede pitch would remain favourable for batting under lights, the team focused on picking up early wickets to slow England’s momentum.

Hardik Pandya provided the early breakthrough, dismissing Phil Salt with his first delivery. Later, Jasprit Bumrah was used strategically during the innings and delivered crucial overs in the latter stages.

Despite a brilliant century from Jacob Bethell, England fell just short of the target as India managed to defend their total and secure a place in the final.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com