English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Top Stories

Shah Rukh Khan denies claims of his role in the release of 8 former naval officers from Qatar, says solely Indian govt feat

Shah Rukh Khan, in a statement, responded to claims of his involvement in freeing Indians from Qatar.

Published

on

Shah Rukh Khan today respnded to the rumors that he was involved with the eight former Indian Navy officers who were just released from Qatar.

After the Indian government intervened, the eight individuals who had been imprisoned by the Qatar govenment on suspicion of espionage were released earlier this month. However, the speculations began to circulate that Shah Rukh was involved because he had just traveled to the Middle East Ccountry.

Shah Rukh’s manager Pooja Dadlani released a response from the star refuting the reports. The statement issued in reference to reports claiming that Khan had a hand in the release of India’s naval officers from Qatar, read, the office of Mr. Shah Rukh Khan says that any such assertions of his involvement are unfounded, emphasizing the execution of this successful resolution solely rests with the Indian government officials and unequivocally denies Mr. Khan’s participation in this matter.

https://www.instagram.com/p/C3ST9fSvrUm/

Additionally, the statement also said, our extremely capable leaders are the finest in all areas including statecraft and diplomacy. The statement further stated, Mr. Khan, like many other Indians, is happy that the naval officers are home safely and wishes them all the best.

Meanwhile, Senior BJP leader Subramanian Swamy said earlier today that Shah Rukh Khan should accompany Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the Gulf nation, claiming the Bollywood actor assisted him in releasing the former Indian naval officers from prison in Qatar.

The eight men, who are former Indian Navy soldiers, had their death sentences remitted by the Court of Appeal in Qatar in December of last year. These eight Indians have been detained in Qatar since October 2022 on charges of espionage related to a submarine program. A court in Qatar sentenced them to death on unspecified offenses. According to an official announcement from the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), seven of the eight former Navy officers returned to India on February 12.

India News

Delhi CM Rekha Gupta says Congress, AAP didn’t address issues of people of capital, BJP did so on day one

The Chief Minister reassured Delhi’s residents that her government would deliver on every commitment made during the election campaign. “We began our work on day one by visiting Yamuna Ghat, and we will ensure that 100% of our promises are kept,” she said, reiterating her administration’s focus on public welfare and development.

Published

on

Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, who was sworn in on Thursday, February 20, along with six other ministers, launched a scathing attack on Congress and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) on Friday, accusing them of failing to address the concerns of Delhi’s residents during their respective tenures.

Gupta emphasized that her government had already taken decisive action by approving the Ayushman Bharat health insurance scheme on its first day in office, a move she claimed the AAP had stalled for years.

“The Congress ruled Delhi for 15 years, and after that, it was the AAP. Yet, neither of them truly addressed the issues faced by the people of Delhi. Now, just one day after we took office, they have started questioning our government,” Gupta said during a press conference.

Highlighting her administration’s commitment to swift and effective governance, Gupta stated, “We passed the Ayushman Bharat scheme in our very first cabinet meeting. We took the oath of office and, on the same day, approved the scheme that the AAP had delayed for years.” She urged the opposition to focus on their internal challenges rather than criticizing the new government. “Many of their members are ready to leave their parties, and they are worried because we are determined to fulfil all our promises,” she added.

Gupta also accused the opposition of fearing transparency under her government. “They are scared because, in the first assembly session, we will present reports that were never submitted before. The truth about their actions will be revealed to the people,” she asserted.

The Chief Minister reassured Delhi’s residents that her government would deliver on every commitment made during the election campaign. “We began our work on day one by visiting Yamuna Ghat, and we will ensure that 100% of our promises are kept,” she said, reiterating her administration’s focus on public welfare and development.

The BJP’s return to power in Delhi after more than 26 years marks a significant political shift, with the party promising to address long-standing issues and bring transparency to governance. As the new government sets its agenda, the focus remains on fulfilling its pledges and improving the lives of Delhi’s citizens.

Continue Reading

India News

India expresses concerns over Trump’s fund for meddling electoral process claims

Trump’s comments have sparked a debate over whether U.S. foreign aid should be used to influence democratic processes in other nations. Critics have raised concerns about the ethical implications of such actions.

Published

on

India on Friday expressed deep concern over U.S. President Donald Trump’s claim that the previous U.S. administration allocated $21 million to influence voter turnout in India, suggesting it amounted to meddling in India’s electoral process.

The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) responded to Trump’s remarks, calling them “deeply troubling” and stating that the matter is under review.

Addressing a press conference, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said, “We have seen information put out by the U.S. administration regarding certain U.S. activities and funding. These are obviously very deeply troubling. This has led to concerns about foreign interference in India’s internal affairs.”

“Relevant departments and agencies are looking into this matter. It would be premature to make a public comment at this stage, so relevant authorities are looking into it, and hopefully, we can come up with an update on that subsequently,” Jaiswal added.

Trump made the comments during his speech at the FII PRIORITY Summit in Miami, where he criticized the funding decisions of the previous administration.

“Why do we need to spend $21 million on voter turnout in India? I guess they were trying to get somebody else elected. We have got to tell the Indian government… Because when we hear that Russia spent about two thousand dollars in our country, it was a big deal. They took some internet ads for two thousand dollars. This is a total breakthrough,” Trump said.

Despite expressing admiration for India and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Trump questioned the rationale behind allocating such a significant amount for voter turnout efforts in another country.

“I have a lot of respect for India and for its prime minister, who just left two days ago. However, we are allocating $21 million to improve voter turnout in India. My question is, what about voter turnout here at home? I believe we have already addressed that; we allocated $500 million for it, which we referred to as the ‘lockboxes,'” the US President said.

Trump’s comments have sparked a debate over whether U.S. foreign aid should be used to influence democratic processes in other nations. Critics have raised concerns about the ethical implications of such actions.

The controversy highlights the sensitivity surrounding foreign interference in domestic electoral processes and underscores the need for transparency in international funding and aid. As Indian authorities continue to review the matter, the incident has added a new dimension to the ongoing discourse on global democratic integrity.

Continue Reading

India News

Four Wikipedia editors booked over objectionable content on Sambhaji Maharaj

“Wikipedia does not operate from India, and it is managed by volunteers who edit content and have editorial rights. We can request them to implement certain regulations to prevent such distortions of historical facts,” he added.

Published

on

The Maharashtra Cyber agency has filed a case against at least four editors of Wikipedia for failing to remove “objectionable” content related to Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj, the son of Maratha empire founder Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. Officials confirmed the action on Friday, citing concerns over the potential for the content to incite unrest in the state.

The Maharashtra Cyber agency had previously issued a notice to the California-based Wikimedia Foundation, the non-profit organization that hosts Wikipedia, requesting the removal of the contentious content. The notice highlighted that the information posted on Wikipedia was inaccurate and could provoke a law-and-order situation, given the deep reverence for Sambhaji Maharaj in India.

Despite the notice, the Wikimedia Foundation did not respond or take down the content, prompting the agency to register a case under relevant sections of the Information Technology (IT) Act. Wikipedia, a free online encyclopedia, relies on a community of volunteer editors who contribute and manage its content.

The issue gained prominence following the release of the Hindi film Chhaava, a biographical work based on the life of Sambhaji Maharaj. The film, which has received positive reviews and strong box office performance, has sparked renewed interest in the historical figure.

Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis took serious note of the matter on February 18, directing the state cyber police to intervene.

“I have asked the Inspector General of Maharashtra Cyber Cell to communicate with Wikipedia officials and request the removal of objectionable content and references against Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj. We will not tolerate distortions or write-ups on open-source platforms that jeopardize our historical facts. I have ordered officials to take all necessary steps,” Fadnavis stated during a press conference in Mumbai.

The Chief Minister acknowledged the challenges posed by Wikipedia’s global operation and volunteer-driven editorial model. “Wikipedia does not operate from India, and it is managed by volunteers who edit content and have editorial rights. We can request them to implement certain regulations to prevent such distortions of historical facts,” he added.

The controversy underscores the growing tension between the need for open access to information and the protection of cultural and historical sensitivities. As Maharashtra authorities pursue legal action, the case highlights the complexities of regulating content on global platforms while respecting local sentiments.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com