English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Failed state, terrorist haven Pakistan raises plebiscite in J&K but doesn’t fulfil preconditions: India at UN

Published

on

Failed state, terrorist haven Pakistan raises plebiscite in J&K but doesn't fulfil preconditions: India at UN

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]India has denounced Pakistan as a ‘failed state’ which promotes terrorism and slammed it for repeatedly raising the issue of plebiscite in Jammu and Kashmir without first fulfilling its obligations set as preconditions in the UN Security Council resolution on Kashmir.

Responding to Islamabad’s bid to raise the Kashmir issue for a second day on Friday at the UN Human Rights Council meeting in Geneva, Mini Devi Kumam, a Second Secretary at the India’s UN Mission in Geneva, said, “The world does not need lessons on democracy and human rights from a country whose own situation is charitably described as a failed state.”

Demolishing Pakistan’s arguments, India gave a long list of transgressions that Pakistan has refused to admit, from Osama Bin Laden found hiding on its soil to terrorists accused in the Mumbai attacks roaming freely in the country.

“Even as terrorists thrive in Pakistan and roam its streets with impunity, we have heard it lecture about the protection of human rights in India,” she said, adding, “We await credible action by the Government of Pakistan to bring all those involved in the 2008 Mumbai attack and the 2016 Pathankot and Uri attacks to justice.”

Kumam was responding to Tahir Andrabi, Pakistan’s UN Deputy Permanent Representative in Geneva, who on Friday alluded to former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru to make his case for a plebiscite in Kashmir.

Andrabi said that at the heart of the Kashmir problem is the right to self-determination, which he claimed was mentioned by “the first Prime Minister of India, one of the founding fathers of India” and by the UN Security Council.

Pakistan has often referred to UN Security Council resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir to push its agenda.

Kumum said, “Pakistan keeps referring to UN Security Council Resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir. However, it very conveniently forgets its own obligation under these resolutions to first vacate the illegal occupation of Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir. It has also blatantly disregarded its other commitments, be it under the 1972 Simla Agreement or Lahore Declaration of February 1999.”

Instead, “they continue to support cross-border terrorism in India,” she said.[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1520672684847{padding-top: 5px !important;padding-right: 5px !important;padding-bottom: 5px !important;padding-left: 5px !important;background-color: #a2b1bf !important;border-radius: 5px !important;}”]Pakistan plans to sell Gilgit-Baltistan in PoK to China, says European expert

A senior European researcher has accused Pakistan of making moves to sell the disputed region of Gilgit-Baltistan to China in return for stacks of Renminbi (Chinese currency) and Yuan (basic unit of Chinese currency), reported news agency ANI from Geneva.

Participating in the 37th session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), Senior Research Analyst at the European Foundation for South-Asian Studies Dušan Vejinovic said Friday, “While Pakistan manifests itself as a self-styled advocate of the rights of the people of Jammu and Kashmir, the factual situation is, that it remains an illegal occupier of Jammu and Kashmir, which has deprived the people of their political and civil liberties.”

“Contrary to the country’s diplomatic rhetoric, it is Pakistan which has denied the people of Jammu and Kashmir their fundamental human rights. Moreover, it is now aspiring to become a broker of Jammu and Kashmir, by negotiating the sale of Gilgit-Baltistan to Beijing, in return for stacks of Chinese Yuan,” he added.

Demanding that the United Nations take appropriate action against Pakistan, Vejinovic said, “Why is Pakistan allowed to infringe international law and make a mockery of this august institution? The United Nations is obliged to act, not only to ensure peace in South Asia, but more importantly, to maintain its own credibility and reinforce its authority.”

Reminding the UNHRC that the U.N. resolutions of 1948 and 1949 had directed Pakistan to withdraw its troops from the state of Jammu and Kashmir by August 13, 1948, a perplexed Vejinovic asked what is preventing Islamabad from complying with a legally binding instruction issued more than 70 years ago.

Jammu and Kashmir has been an area of contention for both India and Pakistan ever since the nations were formed in 1947 with three battles having been fought between the two neighbours over it.[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]In the Simla Agreement signed by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and then-Pakistan President Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the two countries agreed that the Kashmir issue is a bilateral issue that has to be resolved without third party involvement.

The Lahore Declaration by Prime Ministers Atal Bihari Vajpayee of India and Nawaz Sharif of Pakistan commits the two nations to avoid a nuclear arms race.

“It is extraordinary that the state which protected Osama Bin Laden and sheltered Mullah Omar should have the gumption to play the victim,” she said.

In “gross violation” of a Council, the UN-designated terrorists like Hafiz Mohammed Saeed are “freely operating with State support, and the UN designated entities are being politically mainstreamed in Pakistan,” she added.

Andrabi also accused India of “crimes against humanity” in Kashmir and of escalating ceasefire violations along the line of control and the border with his country as a diversionary tactic. In less than 24 hours since that statement, the Indian Army reported firing by Pakistani forces at Krishna Ghati sector in Jammu and Kashmir’s Poonch.

On Thursday, Andrabi had said that the Office of the Human Rights Commissioner “must not falter in documenting human rights abuses by India and recognise that root of the problem is illegal occupation of Jammu and Kashmir.”

“The real problem in the State of Jammu and Kashmir is terrorism, which has constantly received sustenance from Pakistan and territories under its control,” Kumam said in reply. “We urge the Council to call on Pakistan to end cross border infiltration; to dismantle special terrorist zones, safe havens and sanctuaries.”

“Terrorism is the grossest violation of human rights,” Kumam added.

She listed the various human rights violations against minorities in Pakistan and demanded remedies for them.

She said there should be “procedural and institutional safeguards to prevent misuse of blasphemy law; to end forced conversions and marriages of minorities, including Hindu, Sikh and Christian women, to prosecute all such cases; to stop targeting political dissidents and legitimate criticism in Sindh, Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; to stop torture, enforced disappearances and unlawful killing; including that of journalists and activists by its security agencies and prosecute all perpetrators; to stop sectarian violence, systemic persecution and attacks on Muslim minorities, such as Shias, Ahmadiyas, Ismailia and Hazaras.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Markets surge as Nifty jumps 750 points after India-US trade deal

Indian equity markets rallied sharply with Nifty and Sensex posting strong gains after the India-US trade agreement announcement.

Published

on

Sensex

The Indian equity markets opened sharply higher on Tuesday morning, buoyed by optimism following the announcement of a trade agreement between India and the United States.

In early trade, the Nifty jumped around 750 points, while the Sensex surged nearly 2,400 points, reflecting strong investor confidence hours after the deal was made public.

The rally came after US President Donald Trump announced that Washington would slash tariffs on Indian goods to 18 per cent from 50 per cent, as part of a broader trade agreement with New Delhi. In return, India agreed to halt purchases of Russian oil and lower trade barriers, according to the announcement.

President Trump shared the development in a post on his social media platform, calling it a major trade breakthrough. The announcement was followed by a message from Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who thanked the US President on behalf of the people of India for the decision.

Rupee opens stronger against dollar

The positive sentiment was also reflected in the currency market. The Indian rupee opened stronger at 90.40 against the US dollar, gaining 1.10 rupees in early trade, supported by expectations of increased foreign investor inflows following the deal.

Asian markets rebound

Asian markets also traded higher, adding to the positive global cues. Japan’s Nikkei rose about 2.5 per cent, recovering from previous losses, while South Korea’s KOSPI climbed nearly 4 per cent. Market sentiment was further supported by signs of improved US factory activity overnight.

Futures indicated a recovery in Hong Kong markets, while S&P 500 futures were up around 0.3 per cent, as investors tracked upcoming corporate earnings.

With global cues turning favourable and optimism surrounding the India-US trade agreement, Indian markets are expected to remain buoyant, with investors closely watching further developments during the trading session.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump announces trade deal with India, claims New Delhi will stop buying Russian oil

Donald Trump announces a trade deal with India, reducing US tariffs to 18 per cent and claiming New Delhi will halt Russian oil purchases.

Published

on

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday announced that the United States and India have agreed to a trade deal that will reduce American tariffs on Indian goods from 25 per cent to 18 per cent. The announcement was made through a post on Trump’s social media platform, Truth Social.

According to Trump, the decision was taken “out of friendship and respect” for Prime Minister Narendra Modi and at the Indian leader’s request. He stated that the revised tariff would take effect immediately, with remaining formalities to be completed in the coming days.

Prime Minister Modi, in a post shortly after Trump’s announcement, thanked the US President for what he described as a significant step, expressing appreciation on behalf of India’s population.

Tariff reduction to be finalised soon

While neither government initially shared detailed terms of the agreement, the US ambassador to India later indicated that further clarity would follow. In an interaction with media, he confirmed that the overall tariff on Indian goods entering the US market would stand at 18 per cent once the deal is formally concluded.

He added that some procedural aspects are still pending, but the tariff rate itself has been agreed upon and is not expected to change.

Trump also claimed that India would move to reduce its own tariffs and non-tariff barriers on US goods to zero, though no official statement from the Indian side has detailed such measures so far.

Claim on Russian oil purchases

In his post, Trump further asserted that India has agreed to stop buying Russian oil and instead increase its energy purchases from the United States and potentially Venezuela. He linked this claim to broader geopolitical developments, stating that such a move would contribute to ending the war in Ukraine.

There has been no official confirmation from New Delhi regarding any commitment to halt Russian oil imports.

Timing linked to wider trade developments

The announcement comes soon after India concluded a major free trade agreement with the European Union following prolonged negotiations. That agreement provides India with expanded access to the EU market, particularly in pharmaceuticals and medical devices, and is expected to support manufacturing, employment and MSMEs.

The tariff reduction by the US was also announced a day after India presented its annual budget, which included measures aimed at addressing challenges arising from higher US tariffs imposed earlier.

Background of stalled negotiations

Trade talks between India and the US had slowed in recent months after Washington imposed a steep tariff on Indian goods over continued energy purchases from Russia. Negotiations resumed following renewed engagement between the two sides, including high-level discussions between the two leaders.

Officials had earlier indicated that progress was being made toward a trade agreement, with cooperation expanding across areas such as technology, energy, defence and trade.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

India rejects Hague court proceedings on Indus Waters Treaty

India has reiterated it will not participate in Hague arbitration proceedings under the Indus Waters Treaty, stating the agreement remains in abeyance following the Pahalgam attack.

Published

on

Indus Water Treaty

India has reiterated its refusal to recognise or participate in proceedings initiated by a Court of Arbitration in The Hague under the Indus Waters Treaty framework, asserting that the treaty itself remains in abeyance following the Pahalgam terror attack last year.

Despite the arbitration court moving ahead with fresh hearings and procedural orders, New Delhi has made it clear that it does not consider the panel legally constituted and will not respond to its communications.

India dismisses court orders as illegitimate

The latest development centres on an order issued by the Court of Arbitration directing India to submit operational pondage logbooks of the Baglihar and Kishanganga hydroelectric projects. The documents were sought as part of what the court described as the “second phase on the merits” of the dispute.

Hearings have been scheduled for February 2 and 3 at the Peace Palace in The Hague. The court has noted that India has neither filed counter submissions nor indicated its participation in the process.

However, government sources said the arbitration panel was “so-called and illegally constituted” and accused it of conducting parallel proceedings alongside the neutral expert mechanism prescribed under the treaty. According to the sources, India does not acknowledge the court’s authority and therefore does not engage with its directions.

They further stated that since the Indus Waters Treaty has been placed in abeyance, India is under no obligation to respond to such requests, describing the move as an attempt by Pakistan to draw New Delhi back into the process.

Treaty placed in abeyance after Pahalgam attack

India’s decision to suspend the treaty dates back to April 23, 2025, a day after a terror attack in Pahalgam claimed the lives of 26 civilians. The government formally placed the six-decade-old water-sharing agreement in abeyance, linking cooperation under the treaty to Pakistan’s continued support for cross-border terrorism.

The move marked a significant shift in policy, signalling that bilateral arrangements could not operate independently of security considerations.

Pakistan escalates international outreach

Since the decision, Pakistan has stepped up diplomatic and legal efforts, approaching international forums, sending delegations abroad and initiating multiple legal actions to challenge India’s stance.

The Indus river system remains critical for Pakistan’s economy, with a large share of its agriculture dependent on its waters. Limited storage capacity and stressed reservoirs have further heightened Islamabad’s concerns, turning what was once a technical dispute into a strategic issue.

Neutral expert versus arbitration court

Under the treaty’s dispute resolution mechanism, technical disagreements are to be examined by a neutral expert, while legal disputes may be referred to a Court of Arbitration. India has consistently maintained that the current issues fall within the technical domain and has accused Pakistan of forum shopping by activating arbitration proceedings.

The arbitration court has, however, proceeded with the case, stating that India’s position on suspending the treaty does not affect its competence. It has also warned that adverse inferences could be drawn if India fails to comply with its directions.

New Delhi rejects this interpretation and continues to recognise only the neutral expert process, viewing attempts to link the two mechanisms as illegitimate.

Strategic standoff continues

Officials believe the ongoing proceedings in The Hague, conducted without India’s participation, are unlikely to result in binding outcomes. Instead, they see the situation as part of a broader strategic contest, with India choosing disengagement and Pakistan seeking internationalisation of the dispute.

India has consistently maintained that treaties cannot function in isolation from ground realities and that cooperation will remain suspended until what it describes as persistent hostility is addressed.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com