English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Priti Patel resigns from British cabinet, Theresa May to rejig team again

Published

on

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Priti Patel had to resign following reports of her unauthorized meetings with Israeli politicians, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Indian-origin member of the British Cabinet, Priti Patel was, on Wednesday forced to resign as the United Kingdom’s international development secretary, becoming the second member of Prime Minister Theresa May’s cabinet to quit office in little over a week. The development is set to force Theresa May to affect a second reshuffle of her cabinet in the past seven days.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Patel was, on Wednesday, ordered to cut short her trip to East Africa and return to London as the political storm over her unauthorised meetings with Israeli politicians, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, threatened to put Theresa May through another crisis in an election year. On November 1, May’s then defence secretary Michael Fallon had to resign from his position following accusations of sexual misconduct.

Patel was summoned to 10 Downing Street by Prime Minister Theresa May amid rumours that had she resisted the call for her resignation, she would have been fired from the job.

The departure of the Indian-origin cabinet minister of Britain marks yet another setback for a government that is already facing crisis on several fronts, including divisions over Brexit and growing allegations of sexual misbehaviour in politics.[/vc_column_text][vc_raw_html]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[/vc_raw_html][vc_column_text]Patel’s ouster had been imminent ever since reports surfaced of her 12 meetings with Israeli groups and officials, including Benjamin Netanyahu, during a vacation in Israel in August — and that she hadn’t told May or her cabinet colleagues about it. Under British government protocols for ministers, any meeting between them and representatives of foreign countries – politicians or bureaucrats – have to first be informed about to and vetted by the British Foreign Office. Patel had reportedly kept her meetings with Israeli politicians a secret.

Patel apologised for the misconduct but then details of two more unauthorized meetings surfaced, forcing May to seek the resignation.

In her resignation letter, Patel said her conduct “fell below the high standards that are expected of a secretary of state”. The British Prime Minister, in turn, replied that it was right of Patel to quit “and adhere to the high standards of transparency and openness that you have advocated.”

Patel said earlier that her meetings in Israel — arranged by Stuart Polak, honorary president of the group Conservative Friends of Israel — stemmed from her “enthusiasm to engage”. But critics accused her of breaching ministers’ code of conduct and making a major diplomatic gaffe in a region of high political sensitivity.

Israel’s Haaretz newspaper had reported on Wednesday that Patel had visited an Israeli military field hospital in the Golan Heights during her August trip. Britain regards Israel as illegally occupying the territory, which it captured from Syria in 1967.

A report by news agency Associated Press said: “After the visit, Patel discussed with her department the possibility of British aid being given to the Israeli army to support medical assistance for refugees from the Syrian civil war arriving in the Golan Heights. A fellow minister has said the idea was rejected.”

Patel’s situation had been made worse by her contradictory statements about the meetings.

Patel had insisted that British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson “knew about the visit.” Her department was later forced to clarify the statement, saying “the foreign secretary did become aware of the visit, but not in advance of it”, leading to allegations of Patel misleading the British public.

Patel apologised, saying the meetings “did not accord with the usual procedures”.

Patel had also met Israeli public security minister Gilad Erdan in London on 7 September and foreign ministry official Yuval Rotem in New York on 18 September — in both cases without any other British officials present.

Patel’s demotion to a backbench lawmaker cuts short her rapid rise in British politics since her first successful bid to enter the country’s Parliament in 2010.

Labour Party lawmaker Jonathan Ashworth said Patel’s position was untenable even if she had been unaware that she was breaking rules when she met Netanyahu and the others.

“If she didn’t know, she’s incompetent. If she did, she’s lying…either way, she’s got to go,” Ashworth had told Sky News.

Several British lawmakers have been suspended by their parties amid a growing scandal over sexual harassment and abuse in British politics. May’s deputy prime minister, Damian Green, too is facing a civil service investigation after a young party activist accused him of unwanted touches and text messages.

Patel’s resignation will now force May to reshuffle her cabinet again – the second such exercise in just the past week.

The former Conservative leader Iain Duncan Smith, another Eurosceptic, told The Guardian that the British Prime Minister “should not seek to change the fine balance in the cabinet between ‘Remain and Leave’ supporters – a term used for pro and anti Brexit supporters respectively.

“I don’t think Theresa May is looking to change the balance or send any great signal, that would be wrong,” Simith was quoted as saying at BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. “It would be wrong, I think in her own mind, to make any great changes to the balance of the cabinet.”

-(With inputs from AP, The Guardian)

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

S Jaishankar calls Pakistan a “serial practitioner of terrorism” at UN

S Jaishankar criticised Pakistan at the UN General Assembly, referring to a “serial practitioner of terrorism” and warning against attempts to normalise terrorism.

Published

on

S Jayshankar

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar criticised Pakistan during his address to the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, saying that a “serial practitioner of terrorism” had misrepresented facts and that arguments were being made to normalise terrorism. 

Jaishankar’s remarks came a day after Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif addressed the UN General Assembly and spoke about the 2025 military confrontation between India and Pakistan.

Jaishankar’s message to Pakistan

Referring to Pakistan without naming it directly in that remark, Jaishankar said a “serial practitioner of terrorism” had misrepresented facts before the UN General Assembly.

He said arguments were being made to normalise terrorism and claim immunity from its consequences, adding that such an approach would not stand. 

Jaishankar reiterated India’s position that the country would exercise its right to defend itself against terrorism.

He also said that friendship and goodwill could not coexist with terrorism and that understandings based on such circumstances would naturally be called into question. 

“It is for the perpetrator of terrorism to mend its ways,” Jaishankar said.

India stresses zero tolerance on terrorism

Jaishankar described terrorism as a persistent threat to peace and called for governments involved in cross-border terrorism to be held accountable.

He also stressed that there should be no dilution in India’s zero-tolerance approach towards terrorism and particularly called for greater attention to its financial aspects.

His remarks came a day after Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif referred to the 2025 India-Pakistan military confrontation during his UN General Assembly address. 

Jaishankar backs two-state solution for Palestine

During his UN address, Jaishankar also spoke about the situation in West Asia and said India was prepared to contribute to efforts addressing food and energy security amid continuing tensions and violence.

On the Palestine issue, he reiterated India’s longstanding support for a two-state solution.

Jaishankar said India was also contributing humanitarian assistance and relief efforts for the Palestinian people.

He also warned about continuing threats and pressures around the world and stressed the need for greater stability, security and predictability.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump rejects Iran’s 7-day peace plan, says deal can come after US polls

US President Donald Trump rejected Iran’s seven-day proposal to end hostilities and indicated that a deal could come after the US midterm elections in November.

Published

on

Donald Trump

US President Donald Trump has rejected Iran’s latest proposal aimed at bringing an end to the ongoing conflict, while indicating that a possible agreement could come after the US midterm elections in November.

Iran had proposed a seven-day framework under which hostilities could be brought to an end, the Strait of Hormuz could be reopened and negotiations over its nuclear programme could resume.

Iran’s seven-day proposal

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran had put forward the proposal through intermediaries. Under the plan, the Strait of Hormuz would be reopened by the end of the seventh day if specified conditions were met, while broader nuclear discussions would restart.

The proposal was based largely on an earlier understanding reached between Washington and Tehran, but Iran sought to implement the latest framework much faster. The earlier arrangement had provided a longer period for negotiations.

The Strait of Hormuz is a strategically important waterway for global energy shipments, making its reopening a key element of any effort to ease the wider conflict.

Trump points to US midterm elections

Trump, speaking at the United Nations, showed no indication that he was ready to immediately resume negotiations on the terms proposed by Tehran.

He called for the economic isolation of Iran and said he believed a deal could be reached after the US midterm elections in November. Trump also said Iran was waiting to see how he performed in the midterm elections.

The remarks came as Iranian officials signalled that they remained open to diplomacy and described the UN General Assembly as an opportunity to revive negotiations.

Nuclear talks remain part of Iran proposal

Iran’s latest plan links the easing of hostilities with the resumption of negotiations over its nuclear programme.

The proposal follows the collapse of an earlier US-Iran arrangement. According to reporting on the latest proposal, the new framework is intended to compress the timeline for implementing commitments that had previously been discussed by the two sides.

For now, Trump’s remarks indicate that Washington is not accepting Tehran’s seven-day framework as presented, while Iran continues to put diplomacy and negotiations forward as part of its proposal.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Iranian President Pezeshkian at UN says Iranians have been victims of US terrorism

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said at the UN General Assembly that Iranians had been victims of US terrorism and insisted that Iran had acted in self-defence.

Published

on

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian accused the United States of subjecting Iranians to what he described as terrorism while addressing the United Nations General Assembly on Wednesday.

Pezeshkian said Iran had defended itself against attacks and rejected the characterisation of the country as a terrorist actor. His remarks came during a rare wartime appearance at the UN as tensions between Iran and the United States remain high.

Pezeshkian accuses US and Israel of attacks

Speaking at the General Assembly, Pezeshkian said Iranian civilians had been targeted by attacks and described the actions against his country as aggression.

“We have only defended ourselves. We are not terrorists,” he said, according to the report.

Pezeshkian also accused the United States and Israel of attacking Iran, while maintaining that Tehran’s response was an act of self-defence.

The Iranian president displayed photographs of former Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and more than 150 schoolchildren who, according to his account, were killed during the early days of the conflict.

Iran’s message at the UN

Pezeshkian’s address came against the backdrop of the ongoing conflict between Iran and the United States and heightened tensions in the region.

Iranian officials had indicated ahead of the UN visit that they intended to highlight what Tehran considers attacks against its people and raise concerns over the international response to the conflict.

The Iranian delegation’s visit to New York also comes amid restrictions imposed by the United States on the delegation’s movement and other aspects of its stay, according to reporting ahead of the address.

Pezeshkian says Iran defended itself

Pezeshkian’s central message at the UN was that Iran’s military actions should be viewed as a response to attacks rather than terrorism.

His description of the conflict and the allegations against the United States and Israel represent the Iranian government’s position. They should therefore be attributed to Pezeshkian rather than presented as independently established facts.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com