English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Rohingya exodus: Myanmar signs repatriation pact with Bangladesh

Published

on

Rohingya exodus: Myanmar signs repatriation pact with Bangladesh

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Over 600,000 Rohingya Muslims have fled to Bangladesh from Myanmar since the army began an ethnic cleansing drive in August; repatriation to begin in two months

Even as global leaders and human rights organisations continue to voice concerns over the safety of Rohingya Muslims in the strife-torn Rakhine State, the Myanmar government signed a repatriation deal with Bangladesh, on Thursday, under which it would allow members of the persecuted ethnic minority to return to their home country.

The deal, termed by the Bangladeshi establishment as a “primary step” towards the rehabilitation of Rohingya Muslims, will however take about two months to come into effect since both countries will first have to prepare the ground work for identifying and then verifying Rohingya refugees who have fled Myanmar’s Rakhine State since August this year.

The Rohingyas, often seen as the world’s most persecuted ethnic minority, had begun to flee the Rakhine State – a majority of them taking refuge in neighbouring Bangladesh – since August this year when Myanmar’s military began a violent and barbaric crackdown against the community. The crackdown, described by the international community and more recently by US Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson as ‘ethnic cleansing’, had begun after militant members of the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) allegedly attacked an outpost of the Myanmar army.

Thursday’s repatriation deal was signed by Bangladesh Foreign Minister AH. Mahmud Ali and Myanmar State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi in Myanmar’s capital Naypyidaw. Suu Kyi, a Nobel Peace Prize winner, has been under a strident attack by the global community and her brethren from the Nobel laureate fraternity for allegedly turning a blind eye towards the atrocities on the Rohingyas.

According to some estimate, over 600,000 Rohingya Muslims have fled Myanmar to take refuge in neighbouring Bangladesh since August this year. The mass exodus of the people from Rakhine State has caused huge stress on the resources of a financially constrained Bangladesh which also stare at the possibility of clashes erupting on its soil if the humanitarian crisis is not addressed at a war footing.

Details on the repatriation deal were, however, not immediately available and the Bangladesh foreign minister was quoted in media reports as saying that his government would elaborate on the nuances of the memorandum of understanding “once we return to Dhaka.”

“We have to start the process. The houses there (in Rakhine State) have been torched… levelled. They need to be rebuilt… We are ready to take them (Rohingyas) back as soon as possible after Bangladesh sends the (registration) forms back to us,” Myint Kyaing, a permanent secretary at Myanmar’s Ministry of Labour, told mediapersons in Naypyidaw.

All Rohingya refugees who wish to avail benefits of the repatriation deal are required to fill the registration forms and submit them to the Bangladesh government. These forms will then be verified by the Myanmar government following which the repatriation process is expected to commence.

Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina had, prior to signing of the deal with Suu Kyi, renewed her call to Myanmar to immediately start the repatriation of Rohingya.

While Bangladesh has been insistent on repatriation of the Rohingya Muslims within a time-bound framework, it is learnt that the Myanmar government has not agreed to such conditionality yet and has also rejected the possibility of involvement of agencies affiliated with the United Nations to help in the verification process.

Myanmar and Bangladesh have, however, decided to form a joint working group at the foreign-secretary level to start the repatriation process which Aung San Suu Kyi has described as a “win-win situation for both countries” while calling for “amicable bilateral negotiations” to end the crisis.

On September 18, Under attack from the global community and her fellow Nobel laureates, Myanmar State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi had invited diplomats of various missions in her country to speak to them on the issue of violence in the troubled Rakhine state and the measures being taken by her government to restore peace.

Suu Kyi had then asserted: “We are concerned to hear that numbers of Muslims are fleeing across the border to Bangladesh. We want to find out why the exodus is happening.” She had, however, also sought to apparently downplay the extent of the humanitarian crisis in her country by asserting that while her administration wanted to “talk to those who have fled”, it also felt important that the world must take into account “those who have stayed”.

“More than 50 per cent of villages of Muslims are intact and are as they were before the attacks took place”, Suu Kyi had said, despite reports from the ground and by various independent human rights groups who visited Rakhine during the period suggesting otherwise.

It was during her 30-minute speech to diplomats in September that Suu Kyi had first announced that her government was “prepared to start the verification process of refugees (who moved to Bangladesh from the Rakhine) who wish to return” to Myanmar and insisted that “those who have been verified as refugees will be accepted without any problems and with full assurance of security and access to humanitarian aid.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Latest world news

Israel-Lebanon ceasefire to begin within hours as Trump announces 10-day truce

Israel and Lebanon may begin a 10-day ceasefire within hours after a proposal announced by Donald Trump amid ongoing tensions.

Published

on

Donald Trump

A temporary halt in hostilities between Israel and Lebanon is expected to begin within hours after US President Donald Trump announced a proposed 10-day ceasefire between the two sides, amid ongoing tensions in the region.

According to his statement, the ceasefire is likely to take effect around 5 p.m. Eastern Time, although independent confirmation from both sides is still awaited.

The development follows discussions involving Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, with mediation efforts led by the United States.

Officials indicated that the proposed truce is aimed at creating a limited window to reduce violence and potentially pave the way for broader diplomatic engagement. The situation along the Israel-Lebanon border has remained tense in recent weeks, with escalation linked to the activities of Hezbollah.

Diplomatic efforts have intensified in recent days, with discussions facilitated by the United States, including the involvement of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. However, details of the agreement and the extent of coordination between the parties remain unclear.

The situation remains fluid, and the success of the ceasefire will depend on adherence by all sides involved. The conflict has already led to significant humanitarian and geopolitical consequences, including displacement and disruption in affected areas.

While the proposed ceasefire is being seen as an important step toward de-escalation, broader negotiations involving regional stakeholders are expected to be necessary for any lasting resolution.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

US ends oil sanctions waiver for Iran and Russia, impact likely on India’s energy imports

The US decision to end the Iran and Russia oil waiver may impact India’s oil imports, fuel prices and global energy markets.

Published

on

US oil tanker

The United States has decided not to extend a temporary sanctions waiver that allowed limited trade in Iranian and Russian oil, marking a shift towards stricter enforcement of economic restrictions.

The waiver, introduced in March 2026, had permitted the sale of oil already loaded on ships to stabilise global supply during heightened geopolitical tensions. However, it is now set to expire around mid-April without renewal.

US officials have indicated that the move is part of a broader strategy to increase pressure on both Iran and Russia amid ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions.

What the waiver did and why it mattered

The short-term waiver allowed millions of barrels of oil—estimated at around 140 million barrels—to enter global markets, helping ease supply shortages and prevent sharp price spikes.

It also enabled countries like India to purchase discounted crude oil from Russia and resume limited imports from Iran after years of restrictions.

Impact on India

India, one of the world’s largest oil importers, is expected to feel the impact of the decision in several ways:

  • Reduced access to discounted oil
    India had been buying cheaper Russian crude and recently resumed Iranian imports under the waiver. Its end may limit these options.
  • Potential rise in fuel costs
    With fewer discounted supplies available, India may need to rely more on costlier sources, which could increase domestic fuel prices.
  • Supply diversification pressure
    India may need to explore alternative suppliers in the Middle East, Africa, or the US to maintain energy security.
  • Geopolitical balancing challenge
    The move adds pressure on India to align with US sanctions while managing its own economic interests.

Global energy market concerns

The end of the waiver comes at a time when global oil markets are already under stress due to conflict in West Asia and disruptions in key routes like the Strait of Hormuz.

Analysts warn that tightening sanctions could:

  • Reduce global oil supply
  • Increase price volatility
  • Intensify competition among major buyers like India and China

Bigger picture

The US decision reflects a broader shift from temporary relief measures to stricter enforcement of sanctions, even if it risks tightening global energy markets.

For India, the development highlights a recurring challenge—balancing affordable energy access with geopolitical realities.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Sanctioned tanker fails to breach US blockade, turns back near Strait of Hormuz

A US-sanctioned tanker failed to cross the Hormuz blockade and turned back, underscoring rising tensions and disruption in global shipping routes.

Published

on

A US-sanctioned oil tanker failed to break through a newly imposed American naval blockade and was forced to turn back near the Strait of Hormuz, highlighting growing tensions in the region.

The vessel, identified as the Rich Starry, reversed its course after attempting to exit the Gulf, according to shipping data. The development comes just days after the United States enforced restrictions on ships linked to Iranian ports.

The blockade was announced by Donald Trump following the collapse of recent diplomatic talks with Iran. The move aims to restrict maritime traffic associated with Iranian trade.

Officials said that during the first 24 hours of enforcement, no vessel successfully crossed the blockade. Several ships, including the sanctioned tanker, complied with instructions from US forces and turned back toward regional waters.

The tanker is reported to be linked to a Chinese company previously sanctioned for dealing with Iran. It was carrying a cargo of methanol loaded from the United Arab Emirates at the time of the incident.

The situation underscores the rising risks in one of the world’s most critical oil transit routes. The Strait of Hormuz typically handles a significant share of global energy shipments, but traffic has sharply declined due to ongoing geopolitical tensions.

The blockade, which applies specifically to vessels travelling to or from Iranian ports, has added further uncertainty for shipping companies, insurers and global energy markets.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com