English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Why is Bharat Bandh on March 28, 29? Which all sectors are joining nationwide strike? What is open and shut? All you need to know

A group of central trade unions has proposed a nationwide strike on Monday and Tuesday to protest policies that impact employees. Know what is open and shut on these two days.

Published

on

Bharat Bandh

A group of leading trade unions has proposed a nationwide strike on March 28 and March 29 to protest policies that affect workers. The banking industry will join the strike, according to the All India Bank Employees Association. The demand for a nationwide strike was issued after a meeting of the unified platform of central trade unions on March 22, 2022.

Why is Bharat Bandh on March 28 and March 29?

Following a review of preparations in several states, the unions planned a two-day nationwide strike to protest the central government’s anti-worker, anti-farmer, anti-people, and anti-national policies. The bank unions are protesting against both the government’s plan to privatize public sector banks and the Banking Laws Amendment Bill 2021.

States against this nationwide strike

West Bengal: The trade unions which are organizing a two-day strike in the country against the Centre’s economic policies belong to Congress and Left parties and are not linked to the BJP and the TMC.

Meanwhile, the West Bengal government will issue show-cause notices to all of its employees who fail to report to work on March 28 and 29. Employees will not be given casual leave unless they are sick or have a family member who has died, according to the TMC government. As part of its official policy, the TMC has opposed bandhs.

Employee absences on the two days would be classified as ‘dies-non,’ according to the West Bengal government, and no income will be paid unless covered by hospitalization, family tragedy, serious illness, or employees on maternity, child care, medical, or paid leave prior to March 25.

Kerala: Kerala High Court had barred five trade unions in the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL), Kochi, from participating in the nationwide strike.  On Friday, Justice Amit Rawal granted an interim order preventing the unions from going on strike, based on a petition filed by the BPCL questioning the company’s trade unions’ participation in the protest. As a result, BPCL employee unions will not participate in the protest.

Read Also: Bharat Bandh on March 28,29: Planning to take state transport to travel? Know states that have halted their services

Who all are participating in a nationwide strike? What is open and shut?

The sector which is largely impacted due to the Centre’s policy is the banking sector. According to the All India Bank Employees Association, banks will remain closed on these two days and the employees will join the strike.

Also, the employees of the insurance sector will also take part in the nationwide protest.

Employees working in roadways, electricity department and transport sector in Chandigarh and Haryana will also participate in the strike.

Workers in the coal, steel, oil, telecommunications, postal, income tax, and copper industries, among others, are likely to join the strike partly or fully.

According to the trade unions, their associations in the railways and defense sector would be mass mobilizing workers in support of the strike at hundreds of places.

INTUC, AIUTUC, TUCC, AITUC, HMS, CITU, SEWA, AICCTU, LPF, and UTUC are among the central trade unions that have joined the unified forum calling for the strike.

Petrol, diesel prices today: Fuel rates increase by 30 paise, Rs 4-4.10 per litre hike in last seven days, check rates in your city

India Political News Live Updates: Karnataka BJP MLA urges CM Bommai to ban madrasas, says they teach anti-national lessons

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com