English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Interpol turns down NIA’s plea for Red Corner Notice against Zakir Naik

Published

on

Zakir Naik

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]NIA may send fresh request with charge-sheet copy on Monday

In a major relief for controversial Islamic preacher Dr Zakir Naik, Interpol has turned down National Investigation Agency (NIA)’s plea for issuing a Red-Corner Notice (RCN) against him.  While rejecting the NIA’s request Interpol has recently cited that no charge-sheet was filed against the accused at the time of making the plea.

The Interpol commission – which was looking into the RCN request and Dr Naik’s challenging contentions between October 24 and 27 – said in a its December 11  order that “the issuance of a red notice for the applicant’s arrest with a view to his extradition is premature”.

In a quick clarification to its stand the NIA has stated that the ground of complaint against Dr Naik was merely a “technical” one and the charge-sheet was filed subsequently on October 26, this year – “a fact that Interpol did not take cognizance of”. While the NIA made the RCN request against the Islamic preacher in May this year, it filed the charge-sheet only in October.

“The only ground cited by Interpol is that no charges were submitted against Naik when the request was made. The order clearly states the rest of the contentions raised by Naik were not examined. Though NIA later filed the charge-sheet coinciding with the commission’s deliberations, Interpol did not take cognizance or seek a copy of the charge-sheet,” said an NIA official.

However, the NIA asserted that it will be filing a fresh request – along with  a copy of the charge-sheet filed by the agency before a special NIA court – to the international police agency, possibly on Monday.

Furthermore in favor of Dr Naik, the Interpol – in a communication sent to Naik’s lawyer – has stated that it has deleted all data related to Naik from its record – the same had been contested by the accused earlier. Stating that the data had been deleted on November 9, the Interpol mentioned, “After a thorough examination of elements before it, the Commission found that the data contested raised questions as to compliance with applicable rules.”

Confirming the rejection of the RCN plea, a home ministry official said, “In a meeting held at the Interpol recently, they have decided against issuing RCN for lack of a charge-sheet. It’s no setback. Now our charge-sheet is filed. We will send a fresh request. We are sure Interpol will issue RCN this time.”

The NIA, on October 26, had filed a charge-sheet against Zakir Naik alleging that the Islamic preacher is not only a terror suspect but also wanted for inciting communal hatred – by trying to convince youths, through his speeches,  to get into the path of terror.  In its charge-sheet against Naik, the agency has also mentioned the names of Islamic Research Foundation (IRF) and Harmony Media Limited – the companies promoted by Naik.

The agency has also termed Naik as an absconding accused. NIA’s charge-sheet against Naik has been filed under section 10 UA (P) Act and Sections 120B, 153A, 295A, 298 and 505(2) of the Indian Penal Code.

Following claims from a Bangladeshi terrorist of  being inspired by Dr Naik’s speeches for terror activities – the Islamic preacher fled India on July 1, 2016. The NIA filed a charge-sheet against him in November last year under several sections of IPC and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act generally known as UAPA.

However, the Indian government has not yet requested for Naik’s deportation from Malaysia – where he is presently residing. Earlier last month, Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said in a statement that the government is ready to send back Dr Naik if India requests based on Mutual Legal Assistance.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com