English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest Politics News

RS protests: Jaitley says Modi didn’t question Manmohan Singh’s commitment to nation

Published

on

RS protests: Jaitley says Modi didn’t question Manmohan Singh’s commitment to nation

BJP goes on the defensive to broker peace with Congress-led Opposition, apologises on behalf of Modi while distancing from Hegde’s comments

 An end to the protests that have stalled Parliament proceedings, particularly in the Rajya Sabha, ever since the winter session began on December 15, was in sight on Wednesday. Union finance minister Arun Jaitley told the Upper House that Prime Minister Narendra Modi did not mean to question his predecessor, Dr Manmohan Singh, or former Vice President Hamid Ansari’s commitment to the nation.

 The submission by Jaitley, who is also the Leader of the House in Rajya Sabha, comes after Opposition members forced a wash out of the past six sittings of the Upper House demanding an apology from Prime Minister Narendra Modi for suggesting during the election campaign for Gujarat Assembly that Dr Singh, Ansari and the Congress party was ‘conspiring with Pakistan’ to oust the BJP from Gujarat.

 Modi’s statement – unsubstantiated as it was – had been squarely slammed by Dr Singh, who had accused the Prime Minister of “spreading falsehoods and canards”. Other dignitaries who were present at the said meeting – a dinner hosted at the residence of suspended Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar on December 6 for former Pakistan foreign minister Khurshid Kasuri – too had rubbished Modi’s allegation and said that there was no discussion on the Gujarat polls at the event.

 Modi’s studied silence on the controversy had only agitated the Opposition members further and they protested, demanding an apology from the Prime Minister, when the Parliament’s winter session began on December 15. The uproar had led to a logjam that has already consumed six sittings of the curtailed winter session which only has 15 working days to transact its legislative business.

 On Wednesday, the Treasury Benches facing heat from the Opposition over another controversial remark – Union Skill Development Minister Anant Kumar Hegde’s claim of the BJP being elected to power “to change the Constitution” and his assertion that “secularists do not know their parentage” – were forced to go on the defensive.

 With the Opposition resolute in its demand for an apology from Modi for his comments against Dr Singh and for the resignation of Hegde from the Union council of ministers, the Centre finally gave in.

 Union minister of state for parliamentary affairs, Vijay Goel told the Rajya Sabha that his party and its government was “committed to uphold the Constitution” and that Hegde’s comments found no resonance in the saffron fold – a view later also reiterated by his senior minister Ananth Kumar in the Lok Sabha. Jaitley came to the Rajya Sabha when it reconvened – after multiple adjournments earlier in the day – at 2pm and tendered his ‘half-apology’ on behalf of Modi.

 “Prime Minister in his speeches didn’t question, nor meant to question the commitment to this nation of either former PM Manmohan Singh or former Vice President Hamid Ansari, any such perception is erroneous, we hold these leaders in high esteem, as well as their commitment to India,” Jaitley told the Rajya Sabha.

 That the thaw was now ending was evident in Leader of Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, Ghulam Nabi Azad’s response to Jaitley. “I thank the Leader of the House for (the) clarification on what has been an issue of contention. I, on behalf of my party, say that we disassociate from any comments made by any member during elections that may have hurt the PM’s dignity… also we don’t want any such thing to be said in the future,” Azad said.

 Azad’s mention of “disassociating” from comments made by Congress leaders against Modi during the Gujarat election campaign was a veiled reference to Mani Shankar Aiyar’s contentious jibe directed at the Prime Minister, who he had called a “neech kisam ka insaan” (low-level human). Aiyar’s comment had drawn an immediate rebuke from Congress president Rahul Gandhi, who had asked him to apologise for the statement hours before the Congress suspended Aiyar from primary membership of the party. Aiyar’s comment, many believe, had cost the Congress dear in the Gujarat polls – which it lost narrowly to the BJP – after Modi chose to use it in his favour by alleging that the Congress veteran had mocked him for belonging to a “neech jaati” (low caste).

 With Jaitley issuing his half-apology and Azad accepting it, the stalemate seemed to have ended, at least in the Rajya Sabha. The Upper House then began debating the Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill, 2017 which was moved for consideration and passing.

 In the Lok Sabha, however, the stalemate continued longer with Congress-led Opposition parties demanding an apology from Hegde. The Lower House of Parliament, in which the BJP enjoys a brute majority, did manage to pass the crucial National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second (Amendment) Bill, 2017 amid din much to the chagrin of Opposition members who even criticised Lok Sabha Speaker Sumitra Mahajan for condoning the practice of allowing the Treasury Benches to have key Bills passed without proper discussion and amid uproar.

India News

Abhishek Banerjee says will not bow to BJP after nearly 11 hours of ED questioning

After spending nearly 11 hours before the Enforcement Directorate, TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee said he would not bow to the BJP and accused the ruling party of using investigative agencies for political purposes.

Published

on

Abhishek Banerjee

Trinamool Congress leader and Diamond Harbour MP Abhishek Banerjee on Tuesday said he would not bow to the BJP after spending nearly 11 hours being questioned by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with an ongoing investigation.

Speaking after the questioning, Banerjee alleged that central agencies were being used to target opposition leaders and asserted that he would continue his political fight despite what he described as sustained pressure.

The TMC leader has repeatedly maintained that investigations involving him are politically motivated, a charge he has made on several previous occasions while appearing before central agencies.

His appearance before the ED comes amid a period of heightened political activity and multiple investigations involving leaders in West Bengal. Recent days have also seen Banerjee face summons and questioning in separate matters by state investigative agencies.

After leaving the ED office, Banerjee reiterated that he would not be intimidated and said he remained committed to his political responsibilities. He also accused the BJP of attempting to weaken opposition parties through investigative action, an allegation that the BJP has rejected in the past.

The Enforcement Directorate has not publicly commented on Banerjee’s remarks. The investigation related to the questioning remains ongoing.

Continue Reading

India News

DMK attacks Rahul Gandhi, accuses him of weakening opposition unity

DMK has intensified its criticism of Rahul Gandhi, alleging that the Congress leader’s actions have weakened opposition unity and strained relations within the INDIA bloc.

Published

on

Rahul-Gandhi

The war of words between the DMK and Congress has intensified, with the DMK launching a strong attack on Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi and accusing him of contributing to divisions within the opposition alliance. The criticism comes amid strained ties between the two parties following their political split in Tamil Nadu.

According to the DMK, Rahul Gandhi’s political approach has weakened unity among opposition parties. The party’s IT wing mocked the Congress leader on social media, while an editorial published in the DMK’s official mouthpiece Murasoli questioned his recent remarks on opposition solidarity.

DMK questions Rahul Gandhi’s remarks on opposition unity

In its editorial, Murasoli argued that Rahul Gandhi was speaking about opposition unity despite, according to the DMK, contributing to disagreements among alliance partners in several states. The publication cited criticism directed at Congress by various opposition parties and suggested that the party’s actions had often created tensions within the INDIA bloc.

The editorial also referred to past political disputes involving Congress and Left parties, particularly in Kerala, claiming such episodes had raised concerns among opposition allies about Congress’s approach toward its partners.

Tamil Nadu political fallout adds to tensions

The attack comes after a major political realignment in Tamil Nadu. Following the 2026 Assembly elections, Congress ended its alliance with the DMK and joined the government led by Vijay’s Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK). The move left the DMK in the opposition and significantly altered the political equation between the two former allies.

The DMK has alleged that Congress benefited from the alliance during the election and later abandoned its partner. The party’s editorial questioned whether assurances from Congress leadership would be trusted by alliance partners after the developments in Tamil Nadu.

Congress rejects allegations

Congress has not issued a detailed official response to the editorial, but party sources have rejected the allegations. According to the party, its decisions in Tamil Nadu were made in line with the mandate delivered by voters and were not intended to undermine either the DMK or the broader opposition alliance.

The latest exchange highlights growing strains between two key opposition parties even as leaders continue to stress cooperation on national issues. Just days earlier, Rahul Gandhi had said that the DMK remained aligned with the opposition on defending the “idea of India” despite political differences.

Continue Reading

India News

Congress, SP send mixed signals on AIMIM’s role ahead of 2027 Uttar Pradesh polls

Congress and Samajwadi Party leaders have responded differently to questions about AIMIM’s role ahead of the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections, highlighting ongoing discussions over opposition strategy.

Published

on

Differing responses from Congress and Samajwadi Party leaders have highlighted varying approaches within the Opposition camp regarding the possible role of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) in the run-up to the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections.

The discussion gained momentum after AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi launched his party’s campaign preparations for the 2027 elections from Bahraich and reiterated that his party is open to alliances, provided it is treated with respect and as an equal partner.

Different responses from Congress and SP

Reacting to questions about a possible understanding with AIMIM, Congress leader Imran Masood said any decision on alliances would be taken by the party leadership. He also stressed that there could be no compromise with communalism.

On the other hand, Samajwadi Party leader Ram Gopal Yadav adopted a more accommodating tone, stating that anyone capable of defeating the BJP would be welcome. His remarks were viewed as leaving the door open to broader anti-BJP political cooperation.

The differing responses have drawn attention as Opposition parties continue to assess their electoral strategies ahead of the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections.

AIMIM steps up preparations

AIMIM has begun expanding its campaign activity in Uttar Pradesh, with Owaisi launching the party’s preparations from Bahraich. The Hyderabad MP has indicated that AIMIM is willing to consider alliances but has maintained that any partnership must be based on mutual respect and equality.

The party is also working to strengthen its organisational presence in the state as it seeks a larger role in Uttar Pradesh politics ahead of the next Assembly election.

No formal alliance announced

Despite the ongoing discussion, no formal alliance or seat-sharing arrangement involving AIMIM and major Opposition parties has been announced so far.

With more than a year remaining before the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly elections, political equations are expected to evolve as parties finalise their strategies and alliance plans.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com