English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Iran to US: Who are you to decide for Iran and the World?

Published

on

Hassan Rouhani

British foreign secretary, EU foreign policy chief question Pompeo’s suggestions

Reacting to US threat of the “strongest sanctions in history” Iranian President Hassan Rouhani has said that Washington cannot make decisions for Iran and other independent countries asking straight “Who are you to decide for Iran and the world?”

The US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who earlier headed CIA, while delivering his first policy speech in Washington on Monday outlined a list of 12 “basic requirements” for a new treaty, including that “Iran must stop enrichment of uranium and never pre-process plutonium, as well all “unqualified access to all [nuclear] sites throughout the country”.

Pompeo said, US “will apply unprecedented financial pressure on the Iranian regime. The sting of sanctions will be painful if the regime does not change its course from the unacceptable and unproductive path it has chosen to one that rejoins the League of Nations.”

Mike PompeoWhile referring to Iran’s growing influence in the region, Pompeo said Iran would have to end its interventions in regional affairs and conflicts, including in Lebanon and Yemen.  “We will track down Iranian operatives and their Hezbollah proxies operating around the world and crush them” he added.

Iranian President said on Monday, “All world countries want independence in their decisions and perhaps Americans are able to advance their agenda in some places through pressure, but logic does not accept them making decisions for the world.”

Read More: Iran’s Khamenei call Trump’s words- silly and superficial

He further said, “Today, we must help each other more” because the current US administration has regressed to 15 years ago and is repeating the same remarks made by former US president, George W. Bush, in 2003, he added.

Rouhani emphasized that it is “not acceptable at all” that a man who worked at an espionage service for many years is now making decisions for Iran and other countries after assuming the position of US secretary of state. “Who are you to decide for Iran and the world?” he asked.

On May 8, US President Donald Trump announced that Washington was withdrawing  from Iran nuclear deal reached between Iran and the five permanent members of the UN Security Council – the US, Britain, France, Russia and China – plus Germany in 2015.

Trump had also announced that he would reinstate US nuclear sanctions and impose “the highest level” of economic bans on Iran.

Read More: Isolated Trump gets Saudi Arabia, Israel support on Iran deal withdrawal

However, Iran has said it would remain in the JCPOA for now, pending negotiations with the other signatories, before making a final decision on its future role in the agreement.

Iranian foreign minister Javad Zarif has recently travelled to Beijing, Moscow and Brussels for interacting with China, Russia and three major European countries including Britain, France and Germany. He has also held discussions with European Union officials wanting clear-cut guarantees about fulfilling their obligations if it remains in the accord.

Boris JohnsonMeanwhile, British foreign secretary Boris Johnson, while talking at the sidelines of G20 foreign ministers meeting in Argentine capital Buenos Aires on Monday, has questioned the practicality of the tough conditions set by the US for a new “jumbo” Iran deal after Trump administration’s withdrawal from the deal.

Johnson referred to allegations suggesting that they could not be incorporated into one single agreement. He said, “The prospect of a new jumbo Iran treaty is going to be very, very difficult.”

Read More: Trump’s pull out of Iran N-deal may escalate oil prices

Johnson said, “I think if you try now to fold all those issues – the ballistic missiles, Iran’s misbehavior, Iran’s disruptive activity in the region and the nuclear question — if you try to fold all those in to a giant negotiation, a new jumbo Iran negotiation, a new treaty — that’s what seems to be envisaged — I don’t see that being very easy to achieve, in anything like a reasonable timetable.”

Federica MogheriniMoreover, EU’s foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini has stressed that there is no “alternative” to the Iran nuclear deal, after Pompeo vowed “painful” sanctions against Iran.

Read More: Trump may start diplomatic war with European allies on Iran n-deal

In a statement issued on Monday Mogherini said, “Secretary Pompeo’s speech has not demonstrated how walking away from the JCPOA (nuclear deal) has made or will make the region safer from the threat of nuclear proliferation or how it puts us in a better position to influence Iran’s conduct in areas outside the scope of JCPOA.”

India News

Markets surge as Nifty jumps 750 points after India-US trade deal

Indian equity markets rallied sharply with Nifty and Sensex posting strong gains after the India-US trade agreement announcement.

Published

on

Sensex

The Indian equity markets opened sharply higher on Tuesday morning, buoyed by optimism following the announcement of a trade agreement between India and the United States.

In early trade, the Nifty jumped around 750 points, while the Sensex surged nearly 2,400 points, reflecting strong investor confidence hours after the deal was made public.

The rally came after US President Donald Trump announced that Washington would slash tariffs on Indian goods to 18 per cent from 50 per cent, as part of a broader trade agreement with New Delhi. In return, India agreed to halt purchases of Russian oil and lower trade barriers, according to the announcement.

President Trump shared the development in a post on his social media platform, calling it a major trade breakthrough. The announcement was followed by a message from Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who thanked the US President on behalf of the people of India for the decision.

Rupee opens stronger against dollar

The positive sentiment was also reflected in the currency market. The Indian rupee opened stronger at 90.40 against the US dollar, gaining 1.10 rupees in early trade, supported by expectations of increased foreign investor inflows following the deal.

Asian markets rebound

Asian markets also traded higher, adding to the positive global cues. Japan’s Nikkei rose about 2.5 per cent, recovering from previous losses, while South Korea’s KOSPI climbed nearly 4 per cent. Market sentiment was further supported by signs of improved US factory activity overnight.

Futures indicated a recovery in Hong Kong markets, while S&P 500 futures were up around 0.3 per cent, as investors tracked upcoming corporate earnings.

With global cues turning favourable and optimism surrounding the India-US trade agreement, Indian markets are expected to remain buoyant, with investors closely watching further developments during the trading session.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Trump announces trade deal with India, claims New Delhi will stop buying Russian oil

Donald Trump announces a trade deal with India, reducing US tariffs to 18 per cent and claiming New Delhi will halt Russian oil purchases.

Published

on

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday announced that the United States and India have agreed to a trade deal that will reduce American tariffs on Indian goods from 25 per cent to 18 per cent. The announcement was made through a post on Trump’s social media platform, Truth Social.

According to Trump, the decision was taken “out of friendship and respect” for Prime Minister Narendra Modi and at the Indian leader’s request. He stated that the revised tariff would take effect immediately, with remaining formalities to be completed in the coming days.

Prime Minister Modi, in a post shortly after Trump’s announcement, thanked the US President for what he described as a significant step, expressing appreciation on behalf of India’s population.

Tariff reduction to be finalised soon

While neither government initially shared detailed terms of the agreement, the US ambassador to India later indicated that further clarity would follow. In an interaction with media, he confirmed that the overall tariff on Indian goods entering the US market would stand at 18 per cent once the deal is formally concluded.

He added that some procedural aspects are still pending, but the tariff rate itself has been agreed upon and is not expected to change.

Trump also claimed that India would move to reduce its own tariffs and non-tariff barriers on US goods to zero, though no official statement from the Indian side has detailed such measures so far.

Claim on Russian oil purchases

In his post, Trump further asserted that India has agreed to stop buying Russian oil and instead increase its energy purchases from the United States and potentially Venezuela. He linked this claim to broader geopolitical developments, stating that such a move would contribute to ending the war in Ukraine.

There has been no official confirmation from New Delhi regarding any commitment to halt Russian oil imports.

Timing linked to wider trade developments

The announcement comes soon after India concluded a major free trade agreement with the European Union following prolonged negotiations. That agreement provides India with expanded access to the EU market, particularly in pharmaceuticals and medical devices, and is expected to support manufacturing, employment and MSMEs.

The tariff reduction by the US was also announced a day after India presented its annual budget, which included measures aimed at addressing challenges arising from higher US tariffs imposed earlier.

Background of stalled negotiations

Trade talks between India and the US had slowed in recent months after Washington imposed a steep tariff on Indian goods over continued energy purchases from Russia. Negotiations resumed following renewed engagement between the two sides, including high-level discussions between the two leaders.

Officials had earlier indicated that progress was being made toward a trade agreement, with cooperation expanding across areas such as technology, energy, defence and trade.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

India rejects Hague court proceedings on Indus Waters Treaty

India has reiterated it will not participate in Hague arbitration proceedings under the Indus Waters Treaty, stating the agreement remains in abeyance following the Pahalgam attack.

Published

on

Indus Water Treaty

India has reiterated its refusal to recognise or participate in proceedings initiated by a Court of Arbitration in The Hague under the Indus Waters Treaty framework, asserting that the treaty itself remains in abeyance following the Pahalgam terror attack last year.

Despite the arbitration court moving ahead with fresh hearings and procedural orders, New Delhi has made it clear that it does not consider the panel legally constituted and will not respond to its communications.

India dismisses court orders as illegitimate

The latest development centres on an order issued by the Court of Arbitration directing India to submit operational pondage logbooks of the Baglihar and Kishanganga hydroelectric projects. The documents were sought as part of what the court described as the “second phase on the merits” of the dispute.

Hearings have been scheduled for February 2 and 3 at the Peace Palace in The Hague. The court has noted that India has neither filed counter submissions nor indicated its participation in the process.

However, government sources said the arbitration panel was “so-called and illegally constituted” and accused it of conducting parallel proceedings alongside the neutral expert mechanism prescribed under the treaty. According to the sources, India does not acknowledge the court’s authority and therefore does not engage with its directions.

They further stated that since the Indus Waters Treaty has been placed in abeyance, India is under no obligation to respond to such requests, describing the move as an attempt by Pakistan to draw New Delhi back into the process.

Treaty placed in abeyance after Pahalgam attack

India’s decision to suspend the treaty dates back to April 23, 2025, a day after a terror attack in Pahalgam claimed the lives of 26 civilians. The government formally placed the six-decade-old water-sharing agreement in abeyance, linking cooperation under the treaty to Pakistan’s continued support for cross-border terrorism.

The move marked a significant shift in policy, signalling that bilateral arrangements could not operate independently of security considerations.

Pakistan escalates international outreach

Since the decision, Pakistan has stepped up diplomatic and legal efforts, approaching international forums, sending delegations abroad and initiating multiple legal actions to challenge India’s stance.

The Indus river system remains critical for Pakistan’s economy, with a large share of its agriculture dependent on its waters. Limited storage capacity and stressed reservoirs have further heightened Islamabad’s concerns, turning what was once a technical dispute into a strategic issue.

Neutral expert versus arbitration court

Under the treaty’s dispute resolution mechanism, technical disagreements are to be examined by a neutral expert, while legal disputes may be referred to a Court of Arbitration. India has consistently maintained that the current issues fall within the technical domain and has accused Pakistan of forum shopping by activating arbitration proceedings.

The arbitration court has, however, proceeded with the case, stating that India’s position on suspending the treaty does not affect its competence. It has also warned that adverse inferences could be drawn if India fails to comply with its directions.

New Delhi rejects this interpretation and continues to recognise only the neutral expert process, viewing attempts to link the two mechanisms as illegitimate.

Strategic standoff continues

Officials believe the ongoing proceedings in The Hague, conducted without India’s participation, are unlikely to result in binding outcomes. Instead, they see the situation as part of a broader strategic contest, with India choosing disengagement and Pakistan seeking internationalisation of the dispute.

India has consistently maintained that treaties cannot function in isolation from ground realities and that cooperation will remain suspended until what it describes as persistent hostility is addressed.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com