English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Meerut court acquits 40 accused in 1987 Maliana communal riots case

A court in Uttar Pradesh’s Meerut has exonerated 40 accused in 1987 Maliana communal clashes cases that left 63 people dead and hundreds injured.

Published

on

Meerut court

A court in Uttar Pradesh’s Meerut has exonerated 40 accused in 1987 Maliana communal clashes cases that left 63 people dead and hundreds injured.

Communal riots erupted in Maliana on May 23, 1987, following clashes in nearby Hashimpura on May 22 of that year in the aftermath of the April 14 communal violence in the city on the occasion of Shab-e-Baraat that left 12 people dead.

The riots in Maliana left 63 people dead while 42 people were killed in the Hashimpura violence.

A sessions court in Meerut on Saturday acquitted 40 people accused of arson, murder and rioting, citing lack of evidence in the 36-year-old case. However, the victims’ family has said they would challenge the acquittal in the high court.

Representing the accused, Advocate CL Bansal said the accused were exonerated due to lack of evidence against them.

He said that more than 800 dates were taken for hearing in 36-year-old case and only 25 witnesses out of the original 74 remain as some have passed while others have moved to other places.

Read Also: MP Kapil Sibal slams Amit Shah’s remark of no riots under BJP rule, calls it another Jumla

After hearing both sides, Additional District and Sessions Judge Lakhwinder Sood acquitted the 40 accused citing lack of evidence.

Speaking to reporters, Additional District Government Advocate (ADGC) Sachin Mohan said that on May 24, 1987, based on a complaint by Yakub Ali, a case was registered against 93 people—named and unnamed—for the communal clashes that happened at Meerut’s Maliana Holi Chowk on May 23, 1987 in which 63 people were killed and over 100 others injured.

Advocate Mohan said 40 of the original accused have since died while the others, who are unnamed in the FIR, could not be traced.

In his complaint, Yakub Ali had alleged that the accused opened fire on people and committed arson in the locality, Mohan said, adding that 10 witnesses, including the plaintiff, testified in the court, but the prosecution was unsuccessful in proving the case against the accused on the basis of sufficient evidence.

He said that the court, after observing the testimony of the witnesses and the evidence on file, ordered the acquittal of 40 accused, giving them the benefit of doubt.

Meanwhile, the family of the victims’ have said they will challenge the acquittal in the high court. Mahtab (40) a family member of one of the victims, said that his father Ashraf was shot dead during the Maliana riots without any reason and “the decision of the court is not just”, adding that he will appeal in the high court soon after holding talks with other families (of victims)”.

Afzal Saifi (45), family member of another victim whose father Yasin Saifi was reportedly shot and killed while on his way home and his body dumped near a sugar mill, said he would appeal against the court’s verdict in the high court.

MP Kapil Sibal slams Amit Shah’s remark of no riots under BJP rule, calls it another Jumla

Modi surname remark case: Kiren Rijiju calls Rahul Gandhi’s move childish after he bid to challenge conviction in Surat court today

India News

Pawan Khera faces fresh setback as Supreme Court refuses relief in passport row case

Congress leader Pawan Khera faces fresh setback as Supreme Court refuses interim relief and directs him to seek bail from Guwahati High Court.

Published

on

Pawan Khera

Congress leader Pawan Khera suffered another legal setback on Friday after the Supreme Court of India declined to extend protection in a case linked to his remarks about Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife.

A bench of the apex court refused to interfere with an earlier order that had stayed the transit anticipatory bail granted to Khera by the Telangana High Court. This decision leaves the Congress leader open to possible arrest by Assam Police in connection with the case.

During the hearing, Khera’s counsel sought interim protection, but the court declined the request and advised him to approach the appropriate court in Assam for relief. The bench clarified that the Guwahati High Court should decide any bail plea independently and on its merits.

“Am I a terrorist?” remark during hearing

While seeking protection, Khera’s legal team expressed concern over the urgency of the situation. In court, his counsel remarked, “Am I a terrorist?” highlighting the plea for temporary relief until a fresh bail application could be filed.

The Supreme Court also raised concerns over the submission of incorrect documents during the proceedings, adding another layer to the legal complications faced by the Congress leader.

Case linked to remarks on CM’s wife

The case stems from a press conference held earlier this month, where Khera made allegations regarding the citizenship status and financial assets of the Assam Chief Minister’s wife, Riniki Bhuyan Sharma.

He had claimed that she possessed multiple passports and owned undisclosed overseas properties. These allegations were strongly denied by the Chief Minister’s family, who termed them fabricated and misleading.

Legal battle intensifies

Earlier, the Telangana High Court had granted Khera temporary transit anticipatory bail, allowing him time to seek relief from a competent court in Assam. However, the Supreme Court stayed that order following a challenge by Assam authorities, escalating the legal battle.

With the latest ruling, Khera is now expected to move the Guwahati High Court for anticipatory bail as the case continues to unfold.

Continue Reading

India News

Congress suspends 5 Haryana MLAs over cross-voting in Rajya Sabha polls

Congress suspends five Haryana MLAs for cross-voting in Rajya Sabha elections, citing serious indiscipline and anti-party activities.

Published

on

The Congress has suspended five of its MLAs in Haryana for cross-voting during the recent Rajya Sabha elections, taking disciplinary action over what it described as “anti-party activities”.

The move came after the state unit reviewed the conduct of certain legislators during the polls, where some were found to have voted against the party’s authorised candidate.

Five MLAs suspended after disciplinary process

According to party sources, the MLAs were issued show-cause notices seeking an explanation for their actions. After reviewing their responses, the Congress disciplinary committee recommended suspension.

The decision was approved by the party leadership, including Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, and has been implemented with immediate effect.

Party calls it ‘grave indiscipline’

Haryana Congress chief Udai Bhan said the action was necessary to uphold party discipline, stressing that defying the official party line during elections weakens organisational unity.

He said the party takes such violations seriously and will continue to act against any form of indiscipline.

Leadership backs strict action

Senior Congress leader and Leader of Opposition Bhupinder Singh Hooda supported the decision, saying it was taken after due consideration.

He noted that while Rajya Sabha elections are conducted through an open ballot system, allowing legislators some flexibility, the party retains the authority to initiate internal disciplinary action in cases of deviation.

Background

The action follows cross-voting reported during the recent Rajya Sabha elections in Haryana, which led to internal concerns within the party. The development has highlighted organisational challenges and prompted the leadership to take corrective steps to reinforce discipline.

Continue Reading

India News

Harivansh set to be elected Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairperson unopposed

Harivansh is set to be elected unopposed as Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman after no opposition nominations were filed before the deadline.

Published

on

Former Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman Harivansh is set to be re-elected to the same post unopposed in the election due to be held later today.
The date has been fixed by the Chairman under the relevant rules governing the conduct of business in the Upper House.
According to sources, the deadline for submitting motions for the election was 12 noon on April 16. A total of five notices were received within the stipulated time, all proposing Harivansh for the post.

Multiple nominations, single candidate
The motions were submitted by members across parties, including Jagat Prakash Nadda, Nitin Nabin, Nirmala Sitharaman, Sanjay Kumar Jha, and Jayant Chaudhary, each backed by seconding members.
All five motions explicitly state that Harivansh be chosen as the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.

No opposition nomination filed

Notably, no motion was submitted by the Opposition before the deadline. This effectively clears the path for a unanimous election, as there is no contest for the position.
As per parliamentary procedure, motions will be taken up one by one. Once any one motion is adopted by the House, the remaining motions will not be put to vote.

Likely to be elected by voice vote
In line with established practice, the first motion — expected to be moved by Nadda — may be adopted through a voice vote. Following this, the Chairman will formally declare Harivansh as elected Deputy Chairman.
After the declaration, Harivansh will be escorted to the Chair by members from both the Treasury and Opposition benches, adhering to parliamentary convention.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com