English हिन्दी
Connect with us

Latest world news

Sushma Swaraj: India can’t talk when Pakistan promotes Terror

Published

on

Sushma Swaraj: India can’t talk when Pakistan promotes Terror

India denies its involvement in Peshawar school attack

India has alleged that Pakistan’s commitment to terrorism as an instrument of state policy has not been abated a bit and asked the world leaders how India can pursue talks with a country that “glorifies killers” and allow Mumbai attack mastermind Hafiz Saeed to roam free with impunity.

Minister of External Affairs Sushma Swaraj, while addressing the general debate at the  37th session of the  UN General Assembly on Saturday, said that India has made efforts to hold talks with Islamabad and the only reason New Delhi has called off dialogue is because of Pakistan’s behavior.

Sushma Swaraj, who earlier walked out of the SAARC ministerial meeting when her Pakistani counterpart Shah Mehmood Qureshi began his speech, said, “We are accused of sabotaging the process of talks. This is a complete lie. We believe that talks are the only rational means to resolve the most complex of disputes.”

Read More: Pakistan: War with India is not an option, dialogue is key

She said, “Talks with Pakistan have begun many times. If they stopped, it was only because of Pakistan’s behavior.”

While elaborating India’s decision to cancel bilateral foreign minister level meeting, she said that after assuming power, Pakistan’s new PM Imran Khan wrote to Narendra Modi suggesting a meeting between the two country’s foreign ministers  on the margins of UN General Assembly.

She further said that India accepted the proposal, but, within hours of its acceptance, news came that terrorists had killed three Indian soldiers. She questioned, “Does this indicate a desire for dialogue?”

She noted that various governments in India over the years have tried the peace option with Pakistan. She recalled that PM Modi had invited the Heads of SAARC nations to his swearing-in ceremony in 2014 and she visited Islamabad in 2016.

Read More: India Asks Pakistan to Postpone Inspection of Hydro-Projects In Kashmir

She further said, “But soon after Pakistan sponsored terrorists attacked out air force base in Pathankot on January 2. Please explain to me how we could pursue talks in the midst of terrorist bloodshed.”

Sushma Swaraj: India can’t talk when Pakistan promotes Terror

On Saturday (US time), Eenam Gambhir, the first secretary at India’s permanent mission at UN, took a strong stand at the UNGA, called out Pakistan after its foreign minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi alleged that New Delhi was involved in the Peshawar school terror attack in 2014. She rejected the allegation saying it was the “most outrageous and preposterous allegation.”

Gambhir exercised Right to Reply at the UNGA and said, “Let me recollect for Pakistan’s new government, the out pouring of sorrow and pain in India that followed the massacre of innocent school children. India’s parliament had expressed solidarity while paying respect to the memory of those killed. Schools all over India had observed two minutes silence in their memory.”

Indian official also dismissed Pakistan’s claim of fighting terrorism. She said, “Can Pakistan deny that it’s the host and patron of 132 of the Un designated terrorists, 22 terrorist entities sanctioned under the 1267 and 1988 UN Security Council Sanctions Regime as of today?”

Comprehensive talks between India and Pakistan remain suspended for Pakistan’s continuing support to terrorism, especially after terror attack at air force base in Pathankot and security forces in Uri in 2016. Earlier, Mumbai 2008 terror attacks disrupted the comprehensive talks between the two countries.

Latest world news

Israel-Lebanon ceasefire to begin within hours as Trump announces 10-day truce

Israel and Lebanon may begin a 10-day ceasefire within hours after a proposal announced by Donald Trump amid ongoing tensions.

Published

on

Donald Trump

A temporary halt in hostilities between Israel and Lebanon is expected to begin within hours after US President Donald Trump announced a proposed 10-day ceasefire between the two sides, amid ongoing tensions in the region.

According to his statement, the ceasefire is likely to take effect around 5 p.m. Eastern Time, although independent confirmation from both sides is still awaited.

The development follows discussions involving Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, with mediation efforts led by the United States.

Officials indicated that the proposed truce is aimed at creating a limited window to reduce violence and potentially pave the way for broader diplomatic engagement. The situation along the Israel-Lebanon border has remained tense in recent weeks, with escalation linked to the activities of Hezbollah.

Diplomatic efforts have intensified in recent days, with discussions facilitated by the United States, including the involvement of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. However, details of the agreement and the extent of coordination between the parties remain unclear.

The situation remains fluid, and the success of the ceasefire will depend on adherence by all sides involved. The conflict has already led to significant humanitarian and geopolitical consequences, including displacement and disruption in affected areas.

While the proposed ceasefire is being seen as an important step toward de-escalation, broader negotiations involving regional stakeholders are expected to be necessary for any lasting resolution.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

US ends oil sanctions waiver for Iran and Russia, impact likely on India’s energy imports

The US decision to end the Iran and Russia oil waiver may impact India’s oil imports, fuel prices and global energy markets.

Published

on

US oil tanker

The United States has decided not to extend a temporary sanctions waiver that allowed limited trade in Iranian and Russian oil, marking a shift towards stricter enforcement of economic restrictions.

The waiver, introduced in March 2026, had permitted the sale of oil already loaded on ships to stabilise global supply during heightened geopolitical tensions. However, it is now set to expire around mid-April without renewal.

US officials have indicated that the move is part of a broader strategy to increase pressure on both Iran and Russia amid ongoing conflicts and geopolitical tensions.

What the waiver did and why it mattered

The short-term waiver allowed millions of barrels of oil—estimated at around 140 million barrels—to enter global markets, helping ease supply shortages and prevent sharp price spikes.

It also enabled countries like India to purchase discounted crude oil from Russia and resume limited imports from Iran after years of restrictions.

Impact on India

India, one of the world’s largest oil importers, is expected to feel the impact of the decision in several ways:

  • Reduced access to discounted oil
    India had been buying cheaper Russian crude and recently resumed Iranian imports under the waiver. Its end may limit these options.
  • Potential rise in fuel costs
    With fewer discounted supplies available, India may need to rely more on costlier sources, which could increase domestic fuel prices.
  • Supply diversification pressure
    India may need to explore alternative suppliers in the Middle East, Africa, or the US to maintain energy security.
  • Geopolitical balancing challenge
    The move adds pressure on India to align with US sanctions while managing its own economic interests.

Global energy market concerns

The end of the waiver comes at a time when global oil markets are already under stress due to conflict in West Asia and disruptions in key routes like the Strait of Hormuz.

Analysts warn that tightening sanctions could:

  • Reduce global oil supply
  • Increase price volatility
  • Intensify competition among major buyers like India and China

Bigger picture

The US decision reflects a broader shift from temporary relief measures to stricter enforcement of sanctions, even if it risks tightening global energy markets.

For India, the development highlights a recurring challenge—balancing affordable energy access with geopolitical realities.

Continue Reading

Latest world news

Sanctioned tanker fails to breach US blockade, turns back near Strait of Hormuz

A US-sanctioned tanker failed to cross the Hormuz blockade and turned back, underscoring rising tensions and disruption in global shipping routes.

Published

on

A US-sanctioned oil tanker failed to break through a newly imposed American naval blockade and was forced to turn back near the Strait of Hormuz, highlighting growing tensions in the region.

The vessel, identified as the Rich Starry, reversed its course after attempting to exit the Gulf, according to shipping data. The development comes just days after the United States enforced restrictions on ships linked to Iranian ports.

The blockade was announced by Donald Trump following the collapse of recent diplomatic talks with Iran. The move aims to restrict maritime traffic associated with Iranian trade.

Officials said that during the first 24 hours of enforcement, no vessel successfully crossed the blockade. Several ships, including the sanctioned tanker, complied with instructions from US forces and turned back toward regional waters.

The tanker is reported to be linked to a Chinese company previously sanctioned for dealing with Iran. It was carrying a cargo of methanol loaded from the United Arab Emirates at the time of the incident.

The situation underscores the rising risks in one of the world’s most critical oil transit routes. The Strait of Hormuz typically handles a significant share of global energy shipments, but traffic has sharply declined due to ongoing geopolitical tensions.

The blockade, which applies specifically to vessels travelling to or from Iranian ports, has added further uncertainty for shipping companies, insurers and global energy markets.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com