English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Pakistan calls India’s move on Indus Waters Treaty as an act of war

The committee concluded by asserting that Pakistan’s armed forces are fully prepared to defend the nation’s territorial integrity against any misadventure, urging the international community to take note of India’s provocative actions.

Published

on

In a sharp escalation of tensions following India’s decision to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty, Pakistan’s Prime Minister’s Office issued a stern warning on Thursday, April 24, 2025, declaring that any attempt to disrupt water flows to Pakistan would be considered an “act of war.”

The statement came after a high-level meeting of Pakistan’s National Security Committee (NSC), chaired by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, which outlined a series of retaliatory measures, including the closure of its airspace to Indian airlines and a complete halt to all trade activities with India.

The NSC, attended by senior civilian and military leaders, addressed the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which claimed 26 lives. While unequivocally condemning the violence, Pakistan rejected India’s attempts to attribute the attack to it, dismissing such claims as “frivolous” and lacking credible evidence.

The committee reiterated Pakistan’s longstanding position that Kashmir remains an unresolved dispute, emphasizing the Kashmiri people’s right to self-determination as recognized by UN resolutions.

It accused India of perpetuating violence through state oppression, demographic changes, and the marginalization of minorities, particularly Muslims, citing recent legislative moves like the Waqf Bill as evidence of systemic persecution.

Pakistan’s strongest rebuke was reserved for India’s announcement to hold the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance. The 1960 treaty, brokered by the World Bank, has been a cornerstone of water-sharing between the two nations, surviving three wars. The NSC underscored that the agreement contains no provision for unilateral suspension and described water as a “vital national interest” for Pakistan’s 240 million people.

“Any attempt to stop or divert Pakistan’s rightful share of water under the treaty, or to usurp the rights of a lower riparian state, will be treated as an act of war and met with a comprehensive response across all domains of national power,” the statement read.

In response to India’s measures, Pakistan announced a sweeping suspension of all bilateral agreements, including the Simla Pact, accusing India of violating international norms and fostering terrorism. The Wagah border post was ordered closed immediately, with cross-border transit halted, though those with valid endorsements may return by April 30, 2025.

Pakistan also revoked all SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme (SVES) visas for Indian nationals, except for Sikh pilgrims, and instructed Indians in Pakistan to leave within 48 hours. Indian defence, naval, and air advisors in Islamabad were declared persona non grata and given until April 30 to depart, with their posts deemed annulled. The Indian High Commission in Islamabad will see its staff reduced from 55 to 30 by the same date.

Further, Pakistan closed its airspace to all Indian-owned or -operated airlines and suspended all trade with India, including third-country trade routed through Pakistan. The NSC accused India of exploiting the Pahalgam attack to advance a narrow political agenda, pointing to the case of Kulbhushan Jadhav, a serving Indian Navy officer in Pakistan’s custody, as evidence of India’s alleged state-sponsored terrorism. It also criticized India’s “irresponsible warmongering” through state-controlled media, warning that such rhetoric fuels regional instability.

The committee expressed deep sorrow for the loss of lives in Pahalgam but labeled India’s retaliatory measures—announced on April 23—as unilateral, unjust, and politically driven. It argued that India’s narrative of victimhood obscures its own role in regional violence, including alleged extraterritorial assassinations exposed by Pakistan and other nations. Pakistan vowed to pursue justice for those responsible for terrorism and to respond firmly to any threats to its sovereignty.

Reaffirming its commitment to counter-terrorism, the NSC highlighted Pakistan’s sacrifices as a frontline state against terrorism, having endured significant human and economic losses. It called on India to abandon its “reflexive blame game” and take responsibility for its security failures in Jammu and Kashmir. The committee concluded by asserting that Pakistan’s armed forces are fully prepared to defend the nation’s territorial integrity against any misadventure, urging the international community to take note of India’s provocative actions.

As the region braces for heightened tensions, Pakistan’s measures signal a deepening rift with India, with both nations adopting hardline stances in the aftermath of the Pahalgam tragedy.

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com