English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Supreme Court pulls up ED over TASMAC raids in Tamil Nadu, halts further action

The Supreme Court has strongly criticised the Enforcement Directorate over its recent raids in Tamil Nadu, calling its actions excessive and pausing further investigations into TASMAC.

Published

on

Supreme Court

In a significant rebuke, the Supreme Court of India has come down heavily on the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for its aggressive actions targeting Tamil Nadu’s state-run liquor corporation TASMAC, cautioning the agency against breaching the federal structure of governance. The apex court directed the ED to suspend further proceedings, raising serious concerns over the agency’s conduct during its raids in the state.

SC slams ED for overreach, pauses probe

A bench led by Chief Justice BR Gavai termed the ED’s operations as “crossing all limits”, particularly its raids conducted in March and again in May at various TASMAC-run liquor outlets. The court stated that while action against individuals might be acceptable, taking sweeping actions against state corporations could not be condoned.

“You may register cases against individuals… but corporations? Your ED is passing all limits!” the bench observed. The court granted a stay on further proceedings and issued notice to the ED, returnable after the court’s vacation.

State government challenged Madras High Court order

The Tamil Nadu government and TASMAC approached the top court challenging an earlier Madras High Court decision dated April 23, which had permitted ED to proceed with its probe. The petitioners claimed that the ED’s moves were politically motivated and in breach of constitutional principles.

DMK welcomes Supreme Court order

Reacting to the apex court’s intervention, senior DMK leader and former Rajya Sabha MP RS Bharathi said the ruling was a blow to the political efforts aimed at tarnishing the state government’s image. The ruling DMK has consistently maintained that the ED’s actions are part of a wider attempt to malign the state ahead of elections.

ED allegations: ₹1,000 crore unaccounted cash, irregularities in tenders

The ED, during its raids conducted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), had earlier claimed to unearth significant irregularities within TASMAC operations. These included alleged manipulation in the grant of bar licences, corrupt practices in the transportation of liquor, and coordination with private distilleries and bottle suppliers to siphon off public money.

It further alleged the recovery of incriminating data related to the tender process, including overpriced surcharges imposed per bottle sold, reportedly with the involvement of TASMAC officials. The agency claimed it had evidence of manipulated financial records during the award of indent orders and tenders.

ED accused of political vendetta

Following the raids, Tamil Nadu Excise Minister S Muthusamy accused the ED of harassing state officials under the guise of investigation. He questioned the timing and motives behind the searches, asserting that no conclusive evidence was found and that the agency’s efforts were aimed at tarnishing the image of the DMK-led government.

This echoed a broader narrative often raised by opposition parties that central agencies are being misused by the ruling party at the Centre to target non-BJP ruled states, particularly in the run-up to elections.

BJP alleges ministerial involvement

Meanwhile, BJP leader and former state president K Annamalai accused Tamil Nadu minister V Senthil Balaji of being the central figure in the alleged scam. Claiming corruption to the tune of ₹1,000 crore, he alleged that Balaji was “involved in every single scam” and referred to separate court proceedings naming him.

Balaji, however, categorically denied the charges, asserting the transparency of TASMAC’s procurement and pricing mechanisms. He clarified that purchase orders were issued based on long-term average demand calculations, with no room for bias or favouritism.

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

India News

No state will lose a seat, Centre assures as delimitation debate takes centre stage in Parliament

Parliament’s special session begins with key focus on implementing women’s reservation and delimitation, setting the stage for major electoral changes.

Published

on

Parliament

A special session of Parliament commenced on Thursday, with the Centre set to take up crucial legislation related to women’s reservation and delimitation of constituencies. The session, scheduled over three days, is expected to witness intense debate as the government pushes forward its legislative agenda.

At the centre of discussions is the proposal to operationalise the women’s reservation law, which seeks to allocate 33 percent of seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies to women. The law, passed earlier, requires enabling provisions before it can be implemented.

The rollout of the reservation is closely tied to the delimitation exercise — a process that redraws parliamentary constituencies based on updated population data. The implementation is expected only after the next census and delimitation process are completed.

The government is aiming to put in place the framework so that the reservation can be enforced in future elections, likely around 2029.

Delimitation and numbers at play

Delimitation is a key aspect of the proposed changes, as it will determine how seats are redistributed and which constituencies are reserved. The exercise is expected to reflect population shifts and may also involve an increase in the total number of Lok Sabha seats.

This linkage has made the issue politically sensitive, with several opposition parties backing women’s reservation in principle but raising concerns over how and when delimitation will be carried out.

Political reactions and expected debate

The session is likely to see sharp exchanges between the government and opposition. While there is broad agreement on increasing women’s representation, disagreements remain over the timing, process, and potential political implications of the delimitation exercise.

Some leaders have argued that delimitation could significantly alter the balance of representation among states, making it a contentious issue beyond the women’s quota itself.

The government, however, has framed the move as a step toward strengthening women’s participation in governance and ensuring more inclusive policymaking.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com