English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Lungi, baniyan protest rocks Maharashtra Assembly over Slapgate MLA Sanjay Gaikwad

Opposition lawmakers dressed in lungis and baniyans condemned Shiv Sena MLA Sanjay Gaikwad for slapping a hostel employee and making communal remarks targeting the Shetty community.

Published

on

In a dramatic show of protest, opposition lawmakers from the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) staged a unique demonstration outside the Maharashtra Assembly, donning lungis and baniyans to slam Shiv Sena MLA Sanjay Gaikwad over a viral video in which he is seen slapping a canteen employee at the Akashvani MLA hostel in Churchgate, Mumbai.

What Sparked the Controversy?

The incident, now being widely referred to as “Slapgate,” unfolded last week when Sanjay Gaikwad, the Shiv Sena MLA from Buldhana, physically assaulted a hostel canteen staffer, Yogesh Kutran, allegedly over stale food. Gaikwad claimed the dal and rice served to him were foul-smelling, and when complaints over the past two to three years yielded no action, he confronted and slapped the employee in anger.

The confrontation, caught on camera, triggered widespread outrage and demands for accountability. Gaikwad, however, showed no remorse and doubled down on his actions, stating in media interviews that he “knew the road was wrong but it led to the right outcome.” He also alleged that the assault helped trigger action, as the Maharashtra Food and Drug Administration subsequently cancelled the canteen’s license.

Opposition’s ‘Lungi-Baniyan’ Protest: A Symbolic Outcry

Leading the protest, Shiv Sena (UBT) MLC Ambadas Danve and NCP(SP) leader Jitendra Awhad, along with other legislators, wore towels as lungis and baniyans (vests), parodying what they termed the ruling alliance’s descent into “goonda raj.” Placards and slogans condemned the “chaddi-baniyan gang,” mocking the erosion of public dignity in political circles.

Danve denounced the government’s alleged inaction, accusing it of protecting violent elements in its fold. Fellow protester Sachin Ahir echoed the sentiment, arguing that a mere non-cognisable complaint was insufficient and demanded a formal FIR against Gaikwad.

Sanjay Gaikwad’s Defense and Communal Undertones

Defiant and unapologetic, Gaikwad continued defending his actions, asserting that he would not hesitate to repeat them if provoked similarly. During a televised interview, he walked out when pressed on his conduct.

More disturbingly, Gaikwad’s justification took a communal turn. He blamed the Shetty community—primarily from coastal Karnataka—for “defaming” Maharashtra’s culture, referencing dance bars and other establishments. His comments, particularly targeting a southern community involved in the food industry, have drawn sharp criticism for being xenophobic and casteist.

Political Fallout and Public Response

The incident has escalated political tensions in Maharashtra, exposing deep fissures between the ruling Eknath Shinde-led alliance and the opposition bloc. Gaikwad’s statements have added a layer of regional and communal friction, with civil society and opposition leaders demanding legal and ethical accountability.

Despite widespread public condemnation and media scrutiny, there has been no confirmation of punitive action against Gaikwad from the Shiv Sena or the state government.

Conclusion: An Evolving Political Flashpoint

The ‘Slapgate’ episode underscores growing concern over political entitlement and the use of violence under the guise of grievance redressal. While opposition theatrics have amplified public awareness, the real question remains: Will Maharashtra’s ruling dispensation act decisively, or will this be yet another instance of impunity for the powerful?

Continue Reading

India News

Telegram CEO Pavel Durov criticises India restriction, says leak networks shifted to other apps

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has responded to India’s temporary restriction on the platform ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination, arguing that the move affected ordinary users without stopping alleged leak networks.

Published

on

Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has criticised India’s decision to temporarily restrict access to the messaging platform, arguing that the move failed to curb alleged exam leak operations and instead affected millions of legitimate users.

The restriction was imposed ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination as authorities sought to prevent the spread of leaked exam-related material and disrupt networks allegedly involved in malpractice.

In a public response, Durov said the action had inconvenienced a large number of users across India while those responsible for sharing leaked content had simply migrated to alternative platforms.

According to Durov, restricting access to Telegram did not eliminate the problem authorities were trying to address. He claimed that groups involved in distributing exam-related leaks quickly shifted their activities elsewhere, raising questions about the effectiveness of platform-specific restrictions.

The temporary curbs were announced by the government in the lead-up to the NEET-UG re-test scheduled for June 21. Officials said the move was aimed at safeguarding the integrity of the examination process following concerns about the circulation of leaked material online.

The restriction is currently expected to remain in place until June 22.

Durov also stressed that millions of Indian users rely on Telegram for communication, education, business activities and community engagement. He argued that measures targeting an entire platform can have wider consequences for users who have no connection to alleged wrongdoing.

The government’s action came amid broader efforts to prevent cheating and malpractice in competitive examinations. Authorities have been closely monitoring digital platforms and messaging services after reports that exam-related content was being circulated through online channels.

The debate has sparked discussions about how governments and technology platforms should balance examination security with access to digital communication services. While officials maintain that strong measures are necessary to protect the fairness of high-stakes examinations, critics argue that restrictions on entire platforms may not effectively stop determined offenders.

For now, Telegram remains at the centre of the discussion as authorities continue efforts to ensure a fair and secure conduct of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination.

Continue Reading

India News

Telegram restricted ahead of NEET-UG re-exam, NTA backs move to curb exam fraud

NTA has welcomed the Centre’s decision to temporarily restrict Telegram ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination, citing the need to prevent fraud and misinformation.

Published

on

NEET

The Centre has imposed temporary restrictions on messaging platform Telegram ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination, with the National Testing Agency (NTA) welcoming the decision as part of efforts to prevent exam-related fraud and misinformation.

The temporary curbs will remain in place until June 22, a day after the NEET-UG re-exam scheduled for June 21. Authorities said the action was taken following concerns that the platform was being misused by cheating networks and individuals circulating misleading claims related to the examination.

NTA says move aimed at protecting exam integrity

According to the NTA, the restrictions are intended to safeguard candidates from fraudulent activities and false information that could affect the fairness of the examination process. The agency stated that maintaining the integrity of the re-examination remains a priority as lakhs of students prepare to appear for the test.

The NEET-UG re-exam is being conducted after the original examination was cancelled amid allegations of question paper leaks and irregularities. Since then, authorities have been monitoring online platforms for suspicious activity and misleading content targeting candidates.

Restrictions linked to concerns over fake paper leak claims

In recent weeks, several reports surfaced about Telegram channels allegedly offering access to leaked examination papers. The NTA had repeatedly advised students not to trust such claims and referred suspicious links and posts for verification by cybercrime authorities. No official confirmation of any genuine leaked re-exam paper had been issued.

Authorities believe the temporary restrictions will help limit the spread of fake content and reduce opportunities for organised exam fraud in the days leading up to the re-test.

Wider efforts to secure the re-examination

The government and examination authorities have introduced several measures ahead of the re-exam, including monitoring social media platforms and creating channels for reporting suspicious claims related to NEET-UG 2026. The NTA has also urged candidates to rely only on official communications for updates regarding the examination.

With the re-examination approaching, officials say the latest action is part of a broader effort to ensure a fair and transparent process for all candidates.

Continue Reading

India News

Abhishek Banerjee says will not bow to BJP after nearly 11 hours of ED questioning

After spending nearly 11 hours before the Enforcement Directorate, TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee said he would not bow to the BJP and accused the ruling party of using investigative agencies for political purposes.

Published

on

Abhishek Banerjee

Trinamool Congress leader and Diamond Harbour MP Abhishek Banerjee on Tuesday said he would not bow to the BJP after spending nearly 11 hours being questioned by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with an ongoing investigation.

Speaking after the questioning, Banerjee alleged that central agencies were being used to target opposition leaders and asserted that he would continue his political fight despite what he described as sustained pressure.

The TMC leader has repeatedly maintained that investigations involving him are politically motivated, a charge he has made on several previous occasions while appearing before central agencies.

His appearance before the ED comes amid a period of heightened political activity and multiple investigations involving leaders in West Bengal. Recent days have also seen Banerjee face summons and questioning in separate matters by state investigative agencies.

After leaving the ED office, Banerjee reiterated that he would not be intimidated and said he remained committed to his political responsibilities. He also accused the BJP of attempting to weaken opposition parties through investigative action, an allegation that the BJP has rejected in the past.

The Enforcement Directorate has not publicly commented on Banerjee’s remarks. The investigation related to the questioning remains ongoing.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com