English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Ayodhya case hearing put off till February 8, 2018

Published

on

Ayodhya

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The much-awaited final hearing in Supreme Court on the long-standing Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute on Tuesday, Dec 5, ended on expected lines with the next hearing put off till Feb 8, 2018.

Sunni Waqf Board counsel senior advocate Kapil Sibal had wanted it posted to July 15, 2019, after the Lok Sabha elections. Sibal told the apex court that there are serious repercussions outside the court whenever the matter is heard. He requested the court to take up the matter on July 15, 2019 once all the pleadings are complete. The plea was rejected.

The case was being heard by a bench headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer. The bench is hearing a total of 13 appeals filed against the 2010 judgment of the Allahabad High Court in four civil suits.

The high court had ruled a three-way division of the disputed 2.77 acre area at Ayodhya among the parties between the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

The order was challenged before the Supreme Court on May 9, 2011, which in its verdict stayed the operation of the decree and ordered status quo of the land and other adjoining areas acquired by the Centre in 1993.

On August 11, 2017, the parties were given three months to translate all oral evidence and exhibited documents in various languages.

In the hearing on Tuesday, the court was to hear arguments and examine exhibits and documents likely to be relied upon. In pursuance to the apex court’s earlier direction, the Yogi Adityanath government had submitted English translation of exhibits and documents which were in eight different languages.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, reading out the details of exhibits filed by the contesting defendants before the Allahabad High Court, told the three-judge SC bench that all these exhibits had not been filed before the court.

Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Tushar Mehta, representing the state of Uttar Pradesh, rebutted Kapil Sibal’s claim and said that all the related documents and requisite translation copies were on record.

Sibal, questioning ASG Mehta’s claim, asked how could more than 19000 pages of documents be filed in such short time. Sibal also told the SC that he and other petitioners have not been provided with all relevant documents.

The SC bench asked the Advocates on Record of appeals to sit together and ensure that all the requisite documents are translated, filed and numbered before the apex court Registry. In case of any problem, the counsel were directed to consult the Registry.

Earlier, Kapil Sibal argued for deferment of the hearing on the ground that building a Ram temple at the disputed site is a part of the ruling BJP’s manifesto. “BJP leader Dr Subramanian Swamy had gone on record saying that Ram temple would be built before 2019 through legal means. They want to make it as an election manifesto and the court should not fall into the trap. These appeals are not ordinary property disputes as they go to the heart of secular fabric of the country,” Sibal said. He also said he needed time as there are 90,000 pages of documents to go through.

Senior lawyers Harish Salve and CS Vaidyanathan, representing Hindu organisations, objected, saying the court must treat the Ayodhya case like any other.

“We are shocked and surprised,” said Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, adding that the judges were “not bothered about what’s happening outside.” He said that in August this year “all of you wanted the hearing in January and we posted today to hear the statement of facts. Now you want it to be postponed.”

On Sunday, BJP leader Subramanian Swamy had said that the construction of Ram Temple in Ayodhya will start soon and devotees will be able to celebrate the next Diwali there. Earlier, , RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat had declared that only a mandir would come up at the disputed site and nothing else. “We will construct it. It is not a populist declaration but a matter of our faith. It will not change,” he had said.

On Tuesday, Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas chief Mahant Nritya Gopal Das said that in case the Supreme court order is not in their favour, the temple would still be built via Parliament, under Modi Narendra and Yogi Adityanath government.

“If the temple isn’t built during Modi, Yogi government then when it will be built,” said Mahant Nritya Gopal Das.

“Entire land belongs to Lord Ram,” he said.

The Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), extreme Hindu wing of RSS, has declared that the construction will start from October 18, 2018. Assembly poll campaigns would be at peak at the time in BJP ruled Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Rajasthan. It would also be only six months away from Lok Sabha polls.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Trinamool Congress hits back after BJP twists Mamata Banerjee’s remark on religion at Eid event

“Efforts are underway to incite riots, but I implore you not to get ensnared by these tactics. The West Bengal government is dedicated to protecting minority rights, and we will not allow tensions to arise in the state,” she asserted.

Published

on

The Trinamool Congress (TMC) on Monday hit back at the BJP after its leaders twisted West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee’s remark on religion during an event on the occasion of Eid in Kolkata.

Dismissing the BJP accusations against Banerjee of insulting the Hindu religion, Trinamool Congress state vice president Jaiprakash Majumdar said that the party supremo has never criticised the Hindu religion but has consistently opposed the BJP’s communal agenda.

“She has always spoken out against the BJP’s divisive politics, positioning itself as the self-appointed custodian of Hindu interests,” Majumdar said.

During an Eid celebration in Kolkata, CM Banerjee stated, “I adhere to the principles of Shri Ramakrishna Paramahansa and Swami Vivekananda, and I do not subscribe to the ‘ganda dharam’ propagated by some factions, including the BJP, who themselves are misaligned with true Hindu values.”

Retorting sharply to Banerjee’s remarks about the BJP’s “divisive politics,” the saffron party accused her of undermining Hindu beliefs, labelling the BJP’s ideology as contrary to the core tenets of Hinduism.

Addressing the gathering at Red Road in Kolkata, Banerjee urged citizens to remain vigilant against provocations that could spark communal unrest, affirming the state’s commitment to maintaining peace and harmony.

In reply, Leader of the Opposition in the West Bengal Assembly, Suvendu Adhikari, challenged Banerjee’s comments, asking, “Which faith are you labelling as ‘ganda’ (dirty)? Is it the Sanatan Hindu Dharma? Why would you use such incendiary language at an Eid celebration? Was this a religious observance or a political statement? Your words are sowing discord and animosity between communities.”

Banerjee, the Trinamool Congress supremo, further said that no religion advocates hatred towards others, criticizing political leaders and parties that exploit communal sentiments for their own gain. She cautioned against attempts to instigate riots, urging the public to resist such provocations.

“Efforts are underway to incite riots, but I implore you not to get ensnared by these tactics. The West Bengal government is dedicated to protecting minority rights, and we will not allow tensions to arise in the state,” she asserted.

Challenging the BJP further, Banerjee asked, “If the BJP has grievances with minorities, do they intend to amend the Constitution of the country?”

Reiterating her commitment to interfaith respect, she condemned the BJP’s divisive strategy, which she termed “jumla politics.”

Additionally, she criticized the Left, stating, “The ideologies of the Left and the BJP have converged, but rest assured, I will not allow any harm to befall you.”

Meanwhile, adding to his party leader in attacking the chief minister, BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya remarked, “Is Mamata Banerjee suggesting that Sanatan Dharma is ‘Ganda Dharam’? Amidst numerous riots targeting Hindus during her tenure, she belittles their faith and offers a platform for further hostility against them, even at an Eid celebration. This is unacceptable.”

Continue Reading

India News

Nidhi Tewari, an IFS officer, appointed personal secretary to PM Modi

Originally from Mehmurganj in Varanasi, which has been Prime Minister Modi’s Lok Sabha constituency since 2014, her professional background adds a layer of significance to her appointment.

Published

on

Nidhi Tewari has been appointed as the private secretary to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as officially announced in a memorandum issued by the central government. Tewari, a 2014-batch Indian Foreign Service (IFS) officer, assumes this critical role following her previous position as Deputy Secretary in the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) since November 2022.

In her earlier role, Tewari worked as an Under Secretary in the Disarmament and International Security Affairs Division at the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA). There, she handled vital responsibilities related to External Affairs, Atomic Energy, and Security Affairs. Additionally, she managed issues pertaining to the state of Rajasthan, showcasing her diverse expertise in both domestic and international matters.

The formal appointment of Tewari, effective immediately, was approved by the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet. This decision was documented in a memorandum issued by the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) on March 29, indicating a structured process behind her selection.

Tewari’s journey to this notable position reflects not only her dedication but also her impressive track record in civil services. She secured the 96th rank in the 2013 Civil Services Examination, a testament to her hard work and determination. Originally from Mehmurganj in Varanasi, which has been Prime Minister Modi’s Lok Sabha constituency since 2014, her professional background adds a layer of significance to her appointment.

Before entering the Indian Foreign Service, Tewari worked as an Assistant Commissioner (Commercial Tax) in Varanasi. Balancing her job responsibilities while preparing for the Civil Services Examination speaks volumes about her ability to manage challenging tasks effectively.

With Nidhi Tewari’s appointment, Prime Minister Modi now has his third private secretary, following Vivek Kumar and Hardik Satishchandra Shah, who have both previously held the position. Tewari’s extensive experience and familiarity with various affairs make her well-suited for this influential role, as she steps into a vital position within the Prime Minister’s close circle. Her diverse background and commitment to public service are expected to serve her well in this new capacity.

Continue Reading

India News

Filmmaker Sanoj Mishra arrested for raping woman for 4 years on pretext of marrying her

The case revolves around allegations made by a 28-year-old woman from a small town, who accused Mishra of repeatedly raping her over four years under the false promise of marriage.

Published

on

Sanoj Mishra, a filmmaker known for offering a role to viral sensation Monalisa during the Kumbh Mela, was arrested by the Delhi Police on Monday for allegedly raping an aspiring female actor for over four years on the pretext of marrying her.

The 45-year-old director, who lives with his family in Mumbai, was apprehended in Ghaziabad following extensive intelligence work and technical surveillance.

The arrest came after the Delhi High Court rejected Mishra’s bail application, paving the way for his custody by the Nabi Karim Police Station. The case revolves around allegations made by a 28-year-old woman from a small town, who accused Mishra of repeatedly raping her over four years under the false promise of marriage.

According to the complainant, she had been in a live-in relationship with Mishra in Mumbai while pursuing her dream of becoming a film actor. She further alleged that Mishra coerced her into undergoing abortions on three separate occasions. In her complaint, lodged on March 6, 2024, she also claimed that Mishra betrayed her trust by refusing to fulfill his marriage commitment.

The Delhi Police confirmed that an FIR was registered against Mishra under multiple sections, including rape, assault, causing miscarriage without consent, and criminal intimidation. The woman’s allegations were substantiated during her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). Authorities also collected medical evidence related to the alleged abortions from Muzaffarnagar, strengthening the case.

The incident that prompted the complaint occurred on February 18, 2025, when Mishra allegedly took the victim to Hotel Shiva in Nabi Karim. According to the police, he engaged in physical relations with her during this encounter before abandoning her, which led her to report the matter to the authorities.

Mishra’s arrest marks a significant development in the case, following the Delhi High Court’s decision to deny him bail after a detailed review of the evidence. The filmmaker, who gained attention for his work in the film industry, now faces serious legal consequences as the investigation continues.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com