English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

CBSE Class 12 results delayed over marks moderation

Published

on

CBSE Class 12 results delayed over marks moderation

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]The decision to stick with the marks moderation policy will delay the college admission process further.

By Mrinal Verma

The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) withheld the results of the Class 12 examinations on Wednesday. The board has not given any new date to ease anticipation.

The results is said to have been withheld because the Delhi High Court had asked the CBSE to retain its Marks Moderation Policy till 2018. The MMP had been cause for much debate in homes, schools and elsewhere, with many asking for its removal, by tagging it unfair. The MMP has also been said to be responsible for the very high cutoffs at various universities like Delhi University, where even 90% does not guarantee college admission.

The students have been facing a lot of stress because of high cutoffs, which is why many wanted MMP removed. The process of evaluation of answer scripts for 2016-17 had been done keeping this in mind, and without MMP, making evaluation more stringent.

The Delhi High Court’s decision to retain MMP comes in the middle of the process where a majority of the work had already been done, and processing of results had already started. The HC order will now lead to the rechecking and reevaluation of answer scripts that had already been evaluated without the MMP. The delay in the declaration of results will also hold back the admission process in colleges.

Students, on the other hand, are getting more and more anxious every day. They want the results to be out as quickly as possible to put them out of their misery. They also are in favour of MMP, claiming the question papers are extremely tough and some leniency should be given to students. Navreet Kaur, a student of science stream at Apeejay School, Pitampura, is in support of MMP claiming that it is a good step that should be kept because questions in board exams are quite tricky and tough to crack. Keeping a note of how important and impactful board results are in a person’s life, she also says: “I don’t think that it’d be fair to penalise students on extremely tricky questions since we are already dealing with immense pressure inside the exam hall. I think MMP should continue, because board marks are something we carry with us all our lives, for every education and career pursuit. A single exam has the power to make or break certain opportunities and this makes moderation important, as students shouldn’t have to face permanent consequences for a temporary exam.”

Shubhangi Garg, a science student at Modern International School, Dwarka, also stands with MMP as she is anxious about her results and the course they set for her academic career. The tension is also high amongst the family members of the students.

Shubhangi’s sister, Apoorva Garg, is anxious about her sister’s admissions saying that she is looking forward to her getting into DU, but it also seems highly doubtful, with all the high cutoffs that seem impossible to match. Garg claims that MMP should be used very carefully as it awards students too much marks, affecting the college cutoffs, and when students are unable to clear, they get depressed.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Amit Shah counters delimitation concerns, says southern states to gain Lok Sabha seats

Amit Shah assures Parliament that southern states will gain Lok Sabha seats after delimitation, countering opposition criticism during the women’s reservation debate.

Published

on

Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday addressed concerns over the proposed delimitation exercise, asserting in the Lok Sabha that southern states will not lose representation but instead see an increase in their number of seats.

His remarks came during a heated debate linked to the implementation of women’s reservation, where opposition parties have raised fears that population-based delimitation could reduce the political weight of southern states.

Shah rejected these claims, calling them misleading, and said the proposed framework ensures fairness while expanding the overall strength of the Lok Sabha.

Seat count to rise with expansion of Lok Sabha

The government has indicated that the total number of Lok Sabha seats could increase significantly as part of the delimitation process. In this expanded House, the combined representation of southern states is expected to rise from 129 seats at present to around 195 seats.

Shah emphasised that no state will lose seats in absolute terms, and the exercise is designed to reflect population changes while maintaining balance across regions.

State-wise projections shared in Parliament

During his address, Shah also provided indicative figures for individual southern states, suggesting notable increases in representation. According to the projections:

  • Tamil Nadu could see its seats rise substantially
  • Kerala, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh are also expected to gain additional seats
  • Karnataka’s representation may increase as well

These figures were presented to counter the argument that delimitation would disproportionately favour northern states.

Political debate intensifies over linkage with women’s quota

The delimitation exercise has been closely linked to the rollout of women’s reservation, which proposes one-third seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies.

Opposition leaders have questioned this linkage, arguing that tying reservation to delimitation could delay its implementation and raise federal concerns. Some leaders have also warned that the move could impact national unity if apprehensions among states are not addressed.

The government, however, maintains that the reforms are necessary to ensure equitable representation and to align the electoral system with demographic realities.

Centre dismisses ‘false narrative’ on southern states

Shah reiterated that concerns about southern states losing influence are unfounded. He said the delimitation process will increase representation across regions and described the criticism as a “false narrative” aimed at creating confusion.

The issue is expected to remain a key flashpoint as Parliament continues discussions on the women’s reservation framework and related legislative changes.

Continue Reading

India News

PM Modi assures no discrimination in women’s quota, delimitation debate intensifies in Parliament

PM Narendra Modi has assured that women’s reservation will be implemented without discrimination, amid a heated debate over delimitation in Parliament.

Published

on

PM modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has assured that there will be no discrimination in the implementation of women’s reservation, as Parliament witnessed a sharp debate over the proposed linkage between the quota and delimitation exercise.

During the ongoing special session, the government reiterated its commitment to ensuring fair representation while addressing concerns raised by opposition parties regarding the timing and structure of the legislation.

The proposed framework aims to reserve 33 percent of seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. However, its implementation is tied to a fresh delimitation exercise, which is expected after the next census.

Opposition questions timing and intent

Opposition leaders have raised concerns that linking the women’s quota to delimitation could delay its implementation. They argue that the process of redrawing constituencies may push the actual rollout further into the future.

The issue has triggered a broader political confrontation, with multiple parties questioning whether the move could alter representation across states.

Some critics have also alleged that the delimitation exercise could disproportionately benefit certain regions based on population, a charge the government has rejected.

Government reiterates commitment to fair implementation

Responding to these concerns, the Centre has maintained that the reforms are necessary to ensure accurate and updated representation based on population data.

Leaders from the ruling side have repeatedly emphasized that the process will be carried out transparently and without bias. The assurance that there will be “no discrimination” is aimed at addressing fears among states and opposition parties.

The debate marks a key moment in Parliament, with both sides engaging in intense exchanges over one of the most significant electoral reforms in recent years.

Continue Reading

India News

Give all tickets to Muslim women, Amit Shah says, attacking Akhilesh Yadav on sub-quota demand

A sharp exchange between Amit Shah and Akhilesh Yadav in Parliament over sub-quota for Muslim women highlights key divisions on women’s reservation implementation.

Published

on

A heated exchange broke out in Parliament during discussions on the women’s reservation framework, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav locking horns over the demand for a sub-quota for Muslim women.

The debate unfolded as the government pushed forward key legislative measures to implement 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies.

Akhilesh Yadav argued that the proposed reservation must ensure representation for women from marginalised communities, including Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Muslim women. He said that without such provisions, large sections could remain excluded from political participation.

He also questioned the timing of the bill, alleging that the Centre was avoiding a caste census. According to him, a census would lead to renewed demands for caste-based reservations, which the government is reluctant to address.

Government rejects religion-based quota

Responding to the demand, Amit Shah made it clear that reservation based on religion is not permitted under the Constitution.

He stated that any proposal to provide quota to Muslims on religious grounds would be unconstitutional, firmly rejecting the idea of a separate sub-quota for Muslim women within the broader reservation framework.

The government has maintained that the existing framework already includes provisions for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) women within the overall reservation structure.

Wider political divide over implementation

The issue of sub-categorisation within the women’s quota has emerged as a major flashpoint, even as most opposition parties broadly support the idea of women’s reservation.

Samajwadi Party leaders reiterated that their support for the bill depends on inclusion of OBC and minority women, while the government continues to defend its constitutional position.

The debate is part of a broader discussion during the special Parliament session, where multiple bills linked to delimitation and implementation of the women’s quota are being taken up.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com