The Congress on Friday criticised the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led central government for its blatant efforts to deny justice to Adivasis, labeling the Dharti Aaba Janjatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan (DAJGUA) as a mockery of the Forest Rights Act, which highlights the government’s hypocrisy.
The Opposition party asserted that DAJGUA, in a “typical Manuvadi fashion,” perceives these communities merely as forest-dwelling ‘vanvasis’ and ‘labhaartis’ (beneficiaries), rather than recognizing them as political and economic entities in their own right.
In a post on X, Congress General Secretary for Communications Jairam Ramesh said that today marks the 150th anniversary of the birth of ‘Dharti Aaba Bhagwan Birsa Munda,’ one of India’s greatest figures and a staunch proponent of self-governance and social justice.
He accused the Prime Minister of merely paying lip service to Adivasi issues while his government intensified efforts to undermine their justice.
Ramesh pointed out that although DAJGUA is named after Bhagwan Birsa Munda, it fundamentally undermines the Forest Rights Act and demonstrates governmental hypocrisy.
Ramesh emphasised that the 2006 Forest Rights Act (FRA), enacted by the then-Manmohan Singh government, was a groundbreaking piece of legislation that transferred forest control from the forest department to the gram sabha. This act also designated the Ministry of Tribal Affairs as the nodal authority for its implementation, marking a significant shift in power dynamics.
He stated that the FRA empowered Adivasi communities and ‘Gram Sabhas’ to manage forests, contributing to democratic governance. However, he criticised Modi’s administration for what he termed a “counter-revolution,” contending that DAJGUA essentially reverses the progress made by these historic reforms in forest governance.
Ramesh claimed that DAJGUA undermines the authority of the Ministry of Tribal Affairs by enabling the Ministry of Environment, Forests, and Climate Change to oversee FRA implementation.
Instead of strengthening the statutory bodies established by the FRA—such as the Gram Sabha, sub-divisional committee, district committee, and state monitoring committee—DAJGUA introduces a parallel structure of FRA cells at the district and sub-divisional levels. These cells operate under centralised bureaucratic control without accountability to the statutory bodies of the FRA.
Furthermore, DAJGUA engages technical agencies, domain experts, and corporate NGOs for FRA implementation and community forest rights management activities, as facilitated by the State Tribal Welfare Departments, said Ramesh.