English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Hafiz Saeed’s JuD and FIF no more banned organizations

Published

on

Hafiz Saeed’s JuD and FIF no more banned organizations

Imran Khan’s government not extended presidential ordinance

The outfits of Jamaatud Dawa (JUD) and Falah-i-Insaniyat Foundation (FIF) headed by Pakistan’s denounced terrorist Hafiz Mohammad Saeed are no more on the list of banned outfits following the lapse of the presidential ordinance proscribing them under a UN resolution lapsed.

India considers Hafiz Saeed a most wanted terrorist because of his ties to Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) and his involvement in the 2008 Mumbai terror attack, Mumbai train bombings in 2006 and 2001 attack on Parliament. Saeed is listed on NIA most wanted list and India has banned his organizations LeT and JuD.

According to Dawn report published on Saturday, Hafiz Saeed’s counsels Raja Rizwan Abbasi and Sohail Warraich informed Islamabad High Court on Thursday that the presidential ordinance had lapsed and it had never been extended. Imran Khan Government has not extended the ordinance or tabled it in parliament to convert into an act.

The petitioner- Hafiz Saeed had challenged the ordinance under which his organisations had been banned for being on the watch list of the UN Security Council.

Saeed said he was kept in detention in 2009 and 2017 “due to India’s pressure” and the UNSC had passed a resolution against JuD after which the government of Pakistan put it on the watch list. He termed it against the sovereignty of Pakistan that an ordi­na­nce was issued to ban his organization.

Hafiz Saeed contended in the petition that he established JuD in 2002 and cut off all ties with the banned Lashkar-i-Taiba, but India continued to malign JuD for its past association with the banned outfit.

This year in February, Mamnoon Hussian, the former president promulgated an ordinance amending the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, with regards to proscription of terrorist individuals and organizations to include entities listed by the UNSC-in a move to declare JuD and FIF as proscribed groups.

Dawn further reports that Raja Khalid Mehmood Khan, the deputy attorney generalhas confirmed that the ordinance had lapsed. However, he declined to give a statement on behalf of the interior ministry on the subject.

Subsequently, Justice Farooq  disposed of the petition saying that it became in-fructuous since the ordinance challenged by the petitioner had lapsed. Islamabad High Court has also observed that in case the government renewed this ordinance, Saeed was at liberty to file another petition.

In 2012, the US administration announced a bounty of $ 10 million on Hafiz Saeed, while UK, European Union, Russia and Australia have also banned LeT. India has demanded Saeed be handed over to New Delhi but the two countries don’t have extradition treaty.

India News

In Manipur, Kuki-Zo groups launch counter-economic blockade

Published

on

By

Kuki-Zo organisations on Thursday launched a counter-economic blockade in Manipur, demanding that the Centre and the state government ensure uninterrupted movement of essential commodities to the hill districts amid renewed tensions over access to the highways.

The counter-blockade comes in response to the ongoing disruption of traffic on Manipur’s major transport routes with Kuki-Zo groups alleging restrictions on goods have hit residents of hill areas. They urged authorities to restore the free movement of food, medicines, fuel and other essential supplies, saying civilians should not bear the weight of the ongoing ethnic conflict.

In a joint statement, the organisations said the protest would continue until the government took concrete steps to guarantee safe passage for essential commodities and secure national highways. They also appealed to the authorities to prevent any further obstruction to the supply chain and ensure that relief and emergency services remain unaffected.

The development follows heightened tensions over the movement of vehicles on Manipur’s trunk routes, which serve as the primary lifeline for transporting goods across the state. The blockade is expected to impact logistics and transportation if the deadlock continues.

Security has been tightened along vulnerable stretches of highways, with additional personnel deployed to maintain law and order and facilitate the movement of essential supplies. Officials said the administration is monitoring the situation and is making efforts to prevent further escalation while ensuring that basic commodities continue to reach affected areas.

Manipur has witnessed repeated disruptions to road connectivity since ethnic violence erupted in the state, with competing blockades affecting supply of essential goods and normal life. The latest counter-blockade highlights the continuing challenges facing the administration in restoring stability and maintaining uninterrupted access to critical transport routes.

Continue Reading

India News

Can’t lathicharge a peaceful protest, says Supreme Court

Published

on

By

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Monday questioned the Delhi Police action leading to lathicharges during the student protest at Jantar Mantar on July 20.

The bench of Chief Justice of India Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V. Mohana observed that a peaceful protest can’t be net with a lathicharge. The court made the remarks while hearing petitions against excessive force used by Delhi Police against students protesting irregularities in the NEET-UG 2026 examination and other public examinations.

The court said the right to peaceful and lawful protest is under the protection of the Constitution. The court observed that the presence of a protest can’t be a ground for police action and said that any allegation of police excess has to be independently examined.

The petitions concern the events of July 20, when thousands of students and supporters of the Cockroach Janta Party tried to march from at Jantar Mantar to Parliament as the Monsoon Session opened. The protesters were demanding action on paper leaks, examination system reforms and government accountability.

Police said they had stopped the march because of security concerns and restrictions in central Delhi. There was a clash later and police used tear gas and lathi charge to disperse the crowd. Over a 100 protesters and a similar number of police were injured in the incident.

The petitioners had sought an independent probe into the police action during the hearing. They also demanded the retention of CCTV footage, body-camera recordings and other electronic evidence, as well as compensation for those injured in the crackdown.

The case comes amid a nationwide debate over reforms of examinations and the handling of student protests. The Centre has brought in legislative measures to strengthen anti-paper leak laws, even as student organizations continue to demand greater accountability.

Continue Reading

India News

Bill against paper leaks eclipsed by Opposition push for Amit Shah reply

Published

on

By

Amit Shah

The Monsoon Session of Parliament witnessed Opposition-Government scenes on Monday as Union Minister Dr. Jitendra Singh introduced the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 in the Lok Sabha.

The Bill aims to strengthen laws against examination paper leaks and organized cheating following the NEET-UG 2026 controversy.

During the discussions, the Opposition Congress demanded Home Minister Amit Shah’s reply to allegations of police excesses on July 20 during the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) march to Parliament. Over 100 students were treated for injuries ranging from fractures to pellet wounds. CRPF personnel have confirmed seven rounds of pellets were fired and five rounds were fired at the students.

Congress leader Pawan Khera said such force should not have been used against the students and the Home Minister must reply to the allegations. Following disruptions, the House was adjourned several times.

The legislation seeks to impose stricter penalties for paper leaks, organized examination fraud, and other unfair practices. It also provides for faster investigations, time-bound trials, and the establishment of a STF to investigate major examination-related offenses. According to the government, the amendments are intended to improve transparency, protect the credibility of public examinations, and restore students’ confidence in the system.

The Congress and several Opposition parties demanded a detailed discussion in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, arguing that the government must be held accountable for both the examination irregularities and the police response.

The debate comes days after the resignation of former Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, following weeks of nationwide protests over paper leaks and examination malpractice. While the Centre has announced reforms and introduced the amendment Bill, Opposition leaders maintain that legislative changes alone are insufficient without fixing responsibility for the controversy and the police action against students.

The government defended its response, stating that it has initiated investigations into examination fraud, introduced stricter legal provisions, and taken steps to strengthen the security of public examinations. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju urged MPs to participate in the debate and allow the House to function smoothly instead of disrupting proceedings.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com