English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

His jail or bail up to CJI to decide now, Chidambaram evades agencies, ED issues lookout notice

Published

on

former finance minister P Chidambaram

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Congress leader and former finance minister P Chidambaram failed to get any immediate relief from the Supreme Court today (Wednesday, Aug 21). Earlier, Justice NV Ramana declined his plea seeking an urgent hearing for interim relief against Delhi High Court order yesterday cancelling his anticipatory bail in INX media cases. 

Justice Ramana said that he will forward the matter to Chief justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi, since this is a case of ‘monumental money laundering’ and directed Chidambaram’s lawyers to complete the necessary formalities in the meantime.

Chidambaram’s lawyers Kapil Sibal, Salman Khurshid and Vivek Tankha waited before the CJI Ranjan Gogoi’s Constitution Bench till the Bench hearing Ayodhya matter rose for the day, but did not mention urgent listing of interim bail case. A report said they expected CJI to enquire why they were there before leaving the court room. But the CJI left without a word at them.

The CBI and Enforcement Directorate (ED) filed a caveat in the Supreme Court in the petition filed by Congress leader P Chidambaram seeking protection from arrest. This would mean that the apex court will hear the probe agencies before passing any order in the matter.

The ED has issued a fresh lookout circular against P Chidambaram today, said reports. They said the alert notice against the Congress leader has been sent to all land, air and seaports and law enforcement agencies at these facilities. It says the ED should be alerted in case the person is found on their premises.

Chidambaram faces arrest in the INX Media case relating to alleged irregularities in the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) clearance to the media group for receiving overseas funds to the tune of Rs 307 crore when Chidambaram was the Union finance minister.

After the Delhi High Court rejected the former Union finance minister’s anticipatory bail plea, he approached the Supreme Court seeking protection from arrest in the case. Chidambaram’s lawyer Kapil Sibal requested the Supreme Court registrar for urgent listing of his petition yesterday. The registrar asked Sibal to mention the matter before Justice NV Ramana, the third senior-most judge in the SC, on Wednesday as Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice SA Bobde, the second senior-most judge, were both part of a Constitution Bench hearing the Ayodhya matter.

Justice Ramana remained non-committal about granting an urgent hearing. The judge simply told the lawyers that the case file would be placed before the Chief Justice. It is the prerogative of the CJI, as master of roster, to decide the time of the hearing and the appropriate Bench before which the case would come.

“I will send the file to the Chief Justice now itself,” Justice Ramana responded to Sibal’s plea for protection from arrest.

Strongly refuting the plea for protection to Chidambaram, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, for the CBI, said “this is a case of money laundering of monumental magnitude.”

 “Finish all your formalities, I will send the file to the Chief Justice,” Justice Ramana assured Sibal again.

Shortly thereafter, the entire legal team trooped into the Chief Justice’s court where the Ayodhya Bench was about to assemble.

Also Read: INX Media case: Chidambaram denied protection from arrest by HC, may move Supreme Court

Though Mr. Sibal and his team stood in the front row in eager anticipation, they remained silent after a bout of frantic whispering among each other as soon as the five-judge Bench led by Chief Justice Gogoi assembled for the day.

The team made their way out of the court room without uttering a word to the CJI, who glanced at them in taut silence before gesturing to senior advocate CS Vaidyanathan to resume his arguments for Ram Lalla Virajman, the infant deity of Ayodhya.

Outside the court, Tankha explained their decision to keep mum. “We did not mention because we think the Chief Justice will pass an order and assign a Bench to hear the case today itself.”

This did not happen. The team of Chidambaram’s lawyers kept waiting till the Bench rose for the day and CJI Gogoi left.

Last night, when teams from the CBI landed up at his house after the court rejected his plea for anticipatory bail, they could not find Chidambaram. The CBI then pasted a notice outside his house asking him to appear before them within two hours of receiving the note.

It is almost certain that he faced arrest in “INX Media case”. He is accused of facilitating foreign investment in a media company as Finance Minister in the Congress-led UPA government at the instance of his son Karti, who allegedly received kickbacks for his role. Calling it a classic case of money laundering, Justice Sunil Gaur said: “It was pertinently observed that the economic crimes of such mammoth scale are craftily planned and executed. This grant of bail in cases like instant one will send a wrong message to the society.”

Shortly after the order, a CBI team of six officers showed up at Chidambaram’s home at Jor Bagh in south Delhi. After a few hours, the team left and another from the ED arrived. 

Finally, around midnight, the CBI pasted a notice that read: “Whereas it appears that you are acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case noted below, which I am now investigating under Chapter XII of the Code of Criminal Procedure, you are hereby directed to attend before me within two hours of the receipt of this notice for the purpose of investigation of case.”

This morning, Chidambaram’s lawyer demanded to know from the CBI under what law he had been asked to appear within two hours.

The case relates to a First Information Report (FIR) registered by the CBI on May 15, 2017, against alleged irregularities in the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) clearance provided to INX Media for receiving overseas funds to the tune of Rs 305 crore in 2007, when Chidambaram was Finance Minister.

Also Read: Bhim Army leader challenges Mohan Bhagwat to an open debate on Reservation

Later in 2018, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) lodged a money laundering case in this regard. The High Court vehemently dismissed Chidambaram’s claim that the case had nothing to do with money laundering. In fact, the August 20 High Court order clubs the INX Media case with the Aircel Maxis one, saying the “money laundering involved in this INX Media scam is Rs 305 crore and Aircel-Maxis scandal is Rs 3,500 crore.”

Chidambaram’s petition:

In his appeal before the Supreme Court, Chidambaram argued that “none of the three grounds to deny bail were made out: there is no allegation that the petitioner (Chidambaram) is likely to flee justice; or that the petitioner is likely to influence the witnesses; or that the petitioner is likely to tamper with the evidence.”

Chidambaram said he was summoned only once on June 6, 2018, in the case. “He had duly appeared and answered all questions, and no summons was issued thereafter,” the petition said.

“The High Court failed to appreciate that it is the case of the Petitioner that the FIR was baseless, politically motivated and an act of vendetta against the Petitioner (and his son Karti Chidambaram) because the Petitioner is a vocal critic and opponent of the present Central Government both inside Parliament and outside. The Petitioner is a sitting Member of the Rajya Sabha,” the petition said.

The petition contended that the CBI is learned to have sought sanction to prosecute Mr. Chidambaram on January 21, 2019. It can be thus inferred that the investigation into the case is over. If the probe was completed without the need for arresting him, why was there a need to suddenly arrest him now?

The allegations pertain to official acts done 11 years ago. “All actions are recorded in the files. All files and documents are in the custody of the CBI. There is nothing to be recovered from the petitioner,” Chidambaram contended. There had been no instance of him tampering with the evidence.

No official has been arrested in the case. The High Court had granted his son bail. It is unjust to single him out to deny bail, the petition said.

The petition contended that the High Court order referred to transactions and private companies that had nothing to do with INX Media or FIPB approvals obtained in 2007-08.

Finally, Justice Gaur spends considerable space to Karti Chidambaram, which has nothing to do with the anticipatory bail application filed by P Chidambaram.

The petition said the order was largely a “cut and paste” of a note given by the Centre to the High Court.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

India News

Akhilesh Yadav, Mayawati, Tejashwi Yadav mourns demise of Mukhtar Ansari, demand probe

Akhilesh Yadav mentioned that such doubtful cases should be investigated under the supervision of a Supreme Court judge.

Published

on

Mukhtar Ansari, gangster turned politician, who has been in jail since 2005, died due to cardiac arrest on Thursday. After Ansari’s death, his family alleged that the politician had been poisoned in the jail.  

Expressing sorrow, several opposition leaders demanded a probe into the death of Mukhtar Ansari. Notably, the gangster turned politician submitted an application in Barabanki court, alleging he was given some poisonous substance along with his food. He claimed that on March 19, his nerves and limbs started paining after he consumed the food.

Former Deputy Chief Minister of Bihar, Tejashwi Yadav wrote on X that a few days ago Mukhtar Ansari complained that he had been poisoned in jail, yet it was not taken seriously. He added that prima facie the move does not seem justifiable and humane. He stated that constitutional institutions should take suo motu cognizance of such strange cases and incidents.

Former Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh and Samajwadi Party Chief, Akhilesh Yadav said that the state is going through the worst phase of government anarchy. He added that it is the responsibility and duty of the government to protect someone’s life in every situation and at every place. 

The former Chief Minister added that the death of a hostage or prisoner while being confined in the police station, in a fight inside the jail, on falling ill inside the prison, while being taken to court, while being taken to hospital or during treatment in hospital will erode public confidence in the judicial process. He mentioned that such doubtful cases should be investigated under the supervision of a Supreme Court judge. He claimed that the way the government bypasses the judicial process and adopts other methods is completely illegal. 

Taking to social media platform X, Bahujan Samaj Party supremo Mayawati said that the persistent apprehensions and serious allegations made by Mukhtar Ansari’s family regarding his death in jail require a high-level investigation so that the facts in his death can be revealed. 

AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi said that the people of Ghazipur lost their favourite son and brother. He added that Mukhtar Ansari had made serious allegations against the administration that he was poisoned, but the government did not pay any attention to his treatment.

Congress spokesperson Surendra Rajput stated that custodial deaths and firing in jail has become very common in Uttar Pradesh. He added that high level investigation should be conducted.

Continue Reading

India News

Uttar Pradesh on high alert after gangster turned politician Mukhtar Ansari death, probe ordered on poisoned in jail charge

Uttar Pradesh Director General of Police (DGP), Prashant Kumar said that as a precautionary measure, Section 144 of the CrPC has been imposed across the state.

Published

on

Several towns in Uttar Pradesh are on high alert and security has been strengthened after jailed gangster-turned-politician Mukhtar Ansari died of cardiac arrest. His family alleged that the gangster, who has been in jail since 2005, was poisoned. 

The jailed gangster was hurried to a hospital after he fell unconscious at district jail on Thursday night. After a few hours, he was declared dead by the doctors at the Rani Durgavati Medical College. 

Uttar Pradesh Director General of Police (DGP), Prashant Kumar said that as a precautionary measure, Section 144 of the CrPC has been imposed across the state. The Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) has also been called in to assist the police. Reportedly, the CRPF units have already been deployed in Banda, Mau, Ghazipur, and Varanasi.

Additionally, the social media cell of the Uttar Pradesh Police is also on high alert to track unlawful elements that may try to spark a riot. Furthermore, a magisterial investigation into the death of Mukhtar Ansari will be carried out by a three member team, reports said.

A former five-time MLA from Mau Sadar seat Muktar Ansari, had 60 criminal cases pending against him. The gangster turned politician was sentenced in eight cases since September 2022 by different courts of Uttar Pradesh and was lodged in the Banda jail.

Earlier, the former five-time MLA from Mau submitted an application in Barabanki court, alleging he was given some poisonous substance along with his food. He claimed that on March 19, his nerves and limbs started paining after he consumed the food.

Muktar Ansari was born into a family with deep roots in the independence struggle. His grandfather served as the Indian National Congress president in 1927. He was initially affiliated with the Bahujan Samaj Party before forming the Quami Ekta Dal (QED) after being expelled.

Continue Reading

India News

Delhi LG VK Saxena directs probe into remarks against Kangana Ranaut by Congress leader Supriya Shrinate

The Delhi Police will investigate who was behind the said social media post and whose mobile phone was used for the purpose.

Published

on

Delhi lieutenant governor Vinai Kumar Saxena today sought a detailed probe from Delhi Police commissioner Sanjay Arora in relation with the alleged defamatory social media post made by Congress’s Supriya Shrinate against actor-turned-politician Kangana Ranaut.

Reportedly, BJP candidate from New Delhi Bansuri Swaraj had given a complaint to the LG seeking probe and registration of an FIR against Shrinate for outraging the modesty of a woman. Subsequently, the Delhi LG has forwarded the complaint to the Delhi Police Commissioner, directing a scientific investigation in the matter and initiation of legal action, if necessary.

Reports said that the Delhi Police will also investigate who was behind the said social media post and whose mobile phone was used for the purpose. A major controversy erupted on Monday after an objectionable post from Supriya Shrinate’s social media handle against Kangana Ranaut, who has been announced as the BJP candidate from Himachal Pradesh’s Mandi.

Responding to the remarks, Kangana Ranaut said that they must free the daughters from the shackles of prejudices and must rise above the curiosity about their body parts. She added that people must refrain from using sex workers’ challenging lives or circumstances as some kind of abuse or slur. She concluded that every woman deserves her dignity. As the controversy intensified, the Congress leader asserted that someone else had posted the objectionable content from her handle. 

Meanwhile, the Election Commission on Wednesday issued a show cause notice to Congress leader Supriya Shrinate for her derogatory remarks against Kangana Ranaut. The Election Commission observed that the remarks are undignified and in a bad taste. The election body asked the Congress leader to respond to the commission by Friday. In the notice, the Election Commission stated that the statements made by the leader is prima facie violative of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC) being in force ahead of the Lok Sabha elections. 

Continue Reading

Trending

-->

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com