In a major development in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, a key witness has alleged that he was illegally detained and coerced by Maharashtra’s Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) to falsely implicate Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and several prominent leaders linked to the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). This revelation came shortly after the special NIA court acquitted all seven accused in the case.
Witness testifies pressure to frame high-profile individuals
According to the detailed 1,000-page judgment by Special Judge A K Lakhoti of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) court, witness Milind Joshi Rao claimed he was held in illegal custody for a week by ATS officials. During this time, he was allegedly told he would be released only if he named Yogi Adityanath, RSS leader Indresh Kumar, former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur, Hindu religious figure Swami Aseemanand, and Professor Deodhar.
Rao’s testimony stated that the pressure was part of an attempt to manufacture a narrative linking the blast to so-called “saffron terror”.
Acquittal of accused amid serious allegations
The Malegaon blast, which took place on September 29, 2008, in a crowded market about 300 km from Mumbai, had killed six people. Initially investigated by the ATS, the case was later transferred to the NIA, which brought charges against seven individuals including Pragya Singh Thakur.
After years of trial involving 323 witnesses — with 37 turning hostile — the special court ruled that while it was proven a blast occurred, the prosecution failed to establish that a bomb was planted on the motorbike. As a result, all accused were acquitted on Thursday due to “lack of reliable and cogent” evidence.
Ex-ATS officer alleges political pressure during probe
Adding another layer to the controversy, Mehboob Mujawar, a former member of the ATS team, alleged on Friday that there had been attempts to falsely implicate RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat. Mujawar claimed he resisted the pressure to steer the probe toward a “saffron terror” angle and that false charges were filed against him for opposing the plan. His name, however, was later cleared.
“There was a plan to name Bhagwat to push a particular narrative,” he said, reiterating claims of political misuse of the investigation.
NIA court dismisses coercion claims
Despite the explosive testimonies and allegations, the NIA court dismissed the claims of wrongful prosecution and coercion, sticking to its verdict of acquittal based on lack of evidence directly connecting the accused to the explosion.
The Malegaon blast case has long been seen as a politically sensitive matter, and this latest courtroom drama has reignited debates around the integrity of earlier investigations and possible misuse of agencies for political ends.