Union Minister for Minority Affairs Kiren Rijiju launched a scathing attack on the Congress-led UPA government during the Lok Sabha debate on the Waqf Amendment Bill, alleging that the previous regime had denotified properties, including the Parliament building, in favour of the Delhi Waqf Board.
Rijiju claimed that “123 major buildings” were handed over to the Waqf Board during the UPA’s tenure and said, “If Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government did not come to power… even the building we are sitting in could have been claimed as Waqf property.”
Rijiju calls bill a property management reform
The minister insisted that the Waqf Amendment Bill does not interfere with religious aspects but focuses solely on governance and supervision of waqf properties. He stated that the amendments aim to resolve property management concerns and do not change the administration of mosques.
He further said that the government had removed a clause in the existing law that allowed any land to be declared waqf property, calling it a “draconian provision”. Rijiju accused the opposition of spreading misinformation and politicising the bill, adding, “Appeasement does not lead to votes.”
Proposed changes aim for inclusivity
Highlighting the bill’s key proposals, Rijiju said it aims to make waqf boards more inclusive and secular. The new provisions include mandating two non-Muslim members and at least two women in every state waqf board and the Central Waqf Council.
Rijiju also questioned the current lack of female representation and said the amendments would ensure gender inclusion.
Opposition protests over committee changes
The debate saw resistance from opposition members including NK Ramachandran and KC Venugopal, who criticised the changes introduced by the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC). They argued that the JPC was not authorised by the House to make such amendments.
Speaker Om Birla, however, maintained that equal time was given for debate. Home Minister Amit Shah also intervened, stating that the committee only offered suggestions which were later cleared by the Union Cabinet, countering allegations of unilateral decisions.
Shah further took a dig at the Congress, asserting that the BJP-led committees were not “rubber stamp” panels, unlike during the Congress rule.
Timeline and controversy around the bill
Originally tabled in August last year, the Waqf Amendment Bill was met with sharp protests. It was referred to a JPC, which submitted its report in February. The committee’s review process saw frequent disruptions and even an instance of physical altercation.
In total, 66 changes were proposed, with all 44 from the opposition rejected and 14 of 23 suggested by BJP allies approved. A dispute also erupted over the removal of annexures containing opposition dissent notes, later reinstated after discussion.
Among the bill’s key suggestions were the inclusion of non-Muslims, women, and notable public figures on waqf boards, and a clause to limit certain donations to Muslim individuals practicing the faith for at least five years.