English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Supreme Court grants relief to YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia but delivers stern rebuke

SC granted relief to Ranveer Allahbadia but criticized his remarks, blocking further FIRs and ordering him to surrender his passport.

Published

on

Ranveer Allahabadia

Court bars further FIRs but criticizes controversial remarks

The Supreme Court has provided YouTuber Ranveer Allahbadia temporary protection from arrest while strongly criticizing his controversial remarks on a comedy show. The court ruled that no additional FIRs could be filed against him regarding the issue but required him to surrender his passport and seek permission before traveling abroad.

SC slams Allahbadia over controversial comments

A bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice N Kotiswar Singh heard Allahbadia’s plea to club multiple FIRs and secure anticipatory bail against a possible arrest by Guwahati Police.

During the hearing, his lawyer, Abhinav Chandrachud, expressed personal disapproval of his client’s comments but argued that the remarks may not necessarily constitute a criminal offense. However, the court took a tough stance, with Justice Kant questioning, “If this is not obscenity in this country, then what is?”

The court criticized Allahbadia’s conduct, stating, “There is something dirty in his mind that is spread by this programme… The entire society will feel ashamed.”

Protection granted amid threats

Despite its strong rebuke, the court acknowledged the threats to Allahbadia’s safety and assured that the law would take its course. It stated that he could seek police protection in Maharashtra or Assam if needed.

The YouTuber, popularly known as the ‘BeerBiceps guy,’ claimed to have received death threats, including a Rs 5 lakh bounty on his head. He also alleged that his mother’s medical clinic was invaded.

Legal trouble and police action

Ranveer Allahbadia is facing multiple police cases along with a summons from the National Commission of Women. Co-participants on the show, including Samay Raima and Apoorva Makhija, have also been named in police complaints.

Mumbai Police, acting on a complaint from a political functionary, has already recorded statements from seven individuals, including social media influencer Ashish Chanchalani. Investigations are also ongoing in Maharashtra’s Cyber Department and Guwahati Police.

Apology from Ranveer Allahbadia

Following the controversy, Allahbadia publicly apologized, acknowledging that his remarks were inappropriate and insensitive. He stated, “My comment wasn’t funny. Comedy is not my forte. I am here to say sorry.”

Reiterating his regret, he admitted a lapse in judgment and promised to be more mindful of his platform’s influence. “I am not going to justify or provide context. It wasn’t cool on my part,” he said.

The controversy surrounding Allahbadia has sparked a broader debate on the boundaries of humor, free speech, and social responsibility in digital content creation.

India News

15 Maoists killed in Jharkhand encounter, top leader with Rs 1 crore bounty among dead

Fifteen Maoists, including a top leader carrying a Rs 1 crore bounty, were killed in a gunfight with security forces in Jharkhand’s Saranda forest during an ongoing anti-Maoist operation.

Published

on

Fifteen Maoists, including a senior leader carrying a reward of Rs 1 crore, were killed in an encounter with security forces in Jharkhand’s West Singhbhum district on Thursday, according to police officials.

The exchange of fire took place in the Kumdi area of the Saranda forest under the Kiriburu police station limits, where a large-scale anti-Maoist operation has been underway for several days. Around 1,500 personnel of the Central Reserve Police Force’s CoBRA unit are involved in the operation.

Police said the bodies of 15 Maoists have been recovered so far, including that of Patiram Majhi, also known as Anal Da, who was considered one of the most wanted Maoist leaders in the region. A substantial quantity of arms and ammunition was also seized from the encounter site.

The gunfight began around 6 am on Thursday and was still continuing at the time of the latest official update. While the broader operation in Saranda forest started earlier this week, officials said the exchange of fire broke out after security forces acted on specific intelligence inputs.

Inspector General of Police (Operations) Michael Raj S said the operation was launched following a tip-off regarding the presence of Anal Da along with his armed squad in the forest area. A resident of Pirtand in Giridih district, Anal Da had been active in Maoist activities since 1987 and had been evading arrest for decades.

The CRPF Director General visited Chaibasa, the district headquarters of West Singhbhum, earlier this week to review the security situation amid intensified operations in the region.

Officials said Kolhan and Saranda remain among the last Maoist strongholds in Jharkhand, with security forces having significantly reduced insurgent activity in areas such as Buda Pahad, Chatra, Latehar, Gumla, Lohardaga, Ranchi and Parasnath.

Reacting to the development, the leader of the opposition in the Jharkhand Assembly described the encounter as a major success against Maoist violence and praised the personnel involved in the operation. He reiterated the Centre’s stated resolve to eliminate Maoism from the country by March 2026.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah has repeatedly stated that the government aims to eradicate Maoist violence nationwide by March 31, 2026.

According to official data, more than 11,000 Maoists have been arrested in Jharkhand between 2001 and 2025, while around 250 have been killed and over 350 have surrendered. During this period, security forces have also recovered a large cache of weapons and ammunition.

Continue Reading

India News

BJP calls Congress anti-Hindu after Rahul Gandhi questions G-RAM-G scheme

The BJP has accused the Congress of being anti-Hindu after Rahul Gandhi said he was unfamiliar with the new G-RAM-G employment guarantee scheme that replaces MNREGA.

Published

on

Rahul-Gandhi

The Bharatiya Janata Party on Wednesday accused the Congress of being “anti-Hindu” after senior leader Rahul Gandhi said he was unfamiliar with the name of the newly introduced G-RAM-G employment guarantee scheme, which has replaced the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act.

Speaking at a conference held at Delhi’s Jawahar Bhavan, Rahul Gandhi remarked, “I don’t know what G-RAM-G is,” while addressing an event focused on MNREGA, the flagship rural employment programme launched during the Congress-led government. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge made similar comments at the event.

BJP response and political backlash

The BJP reacted sharply, alleging that Rahul Gandhi’s remarks reflected hostility towards Lord Ram. Party leaders claimed the comments had “exposed the Congress’ anti-Hindu mindset,” a charge that intensified the political confrontation over the new legislation.

Several opposition leaders have argued that one of the core concerns with the G-RAM-G scheme is the replacement of Mahatma Gandhi’s name with that of a religious figure, a move they say politicises a welfare programme that was previously secular in identity.

Congress alleges attempt to weaken employment guarantee

At the conference, Rahul Gandhi said MNREGA had given poor households a legal right to employment, which he claimed Prime Minister Narendra Modi was attempting to dismantle. He also referred to the now-repealed farm laws of 2020, saying sustained public pressure had earlier forced the government to withdraw them.

“If we stand together, the government will be forced to back down and MNREGA will be restarted,” Gandhi said, asserting that the employment guarantee programme could be revived through collective resistance.

Mallikarjun Kharge accused the BJP of trying to erase Mahatma Gandhi’s legacy from public memory and said the Congress would raise the issue again during the upcoming Budget session of Parliament.

States move to support MNREGA

As the political debate continues, at least two opposition-ruled states have taken steps to support MNREGA. Karnataka and Tamil Nadu have both indicated plans to pass Assembly resolutions backing the older scheme.

In Karnataka, proceedings were disrupted after Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot declined to read out portions of a government-prepared speech that criticised the G-RAM-G framework. In Tamil Nadu, Chief Minister MK Stalin said his government would also move a resolution in support of MNREGA.

What the G-RAM-G scheme changes

The new G-RAM-G law introduces several structural changes compared to MNREGA. The guaranteed number of workdays has been increased to 125 from 100, but employment is limited to areas officially notified as rural by the central government.

Under the revised funding structure, states are now required to bear 40 per cent of the scheme’s costs, while the Centre will contribute the remaining amount. Hill states and northeastern states will pay only 10 per cent, and Union Territories will continue to receive full central funding.

The Centre will also adopt a “normative” allocation model, deciding annual fund limits for states based on defined parameters, rather than demand. This gives the Centre greater control over fund releases and the authority to suspend allocations in cases of serious irregularities.

While the government has said the changes will encourage states to take financial ownership without imposing excessive burdens, the opposition has described the scheme as “anti-poor,” warning that it could reduce employment opportunities by straining state finances.

Continue Reading

India News

Congress seeks action against Udupi DC over saffron flag row

The Congress has sought action against Udupi deputy commissioner T K Swaroopa over allegations that she waved a saffron flag during the Paryaya procession, a charge she has denied, saying her participation was part of official duty.

Published

on

Paryaya' system in Udupi

The Congress has sought action against Udupi deputy commissioner T K Swaroopa over allegations that she waved a saffron flag during the Paryaya procession held on January 18, triggering a political controversy in coastal Karnataka.

The issue surfaced after the Legal and Human Rights Cell of the Udupi District Congress Committee wrote to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, demanding an inquiry into Swaroopa’s conduct during the religious procession linked to the Udupi Sri Krishna Math.

DC denies political motivation

Responding to the allegations, Swaroopa said she attended the event strictly in her official capacity and denied any politically motivated participation.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, she said that at around 3 am on January 18, she flagged off the Puraprevesh programme of the Swamiji as part of the biennial Paryayotsava celebrations. She added that she did so in her role as the administrator of the Udupi City Council.

Swaroopa also said she attended the civic honour programme for the new paryaya swamiji and the durbar event held after the swamiji ascended the Sarvajna Peetha, reiterating that her presence was aligned with administrative responsibilities.

Congress seeks inquiry, alleges rule violation

In the letter addressed to the chief minister on Monday, Udupi District Congress Committee Legal and Human Rights Cell president Harish Shetty alleged that ahead of the procession from Jodu Katte to Krishna Math, a BJP MLA handed over a saffron flag to the deputy commissioner, which she allegedly raised and waved in public.

The letter claimed that such an act violated service rules governing civil servants and went against the constitutional principle of secularism. The Congress has demanded a formal inquiry and appropriate action in accordance with law.

About the Paryaya system

The Paryaya or Paryayotsava marks the ceremonial transfer of ritual and administrative control of the Udupi Sri Krishna Temple. On January 18, Shiroor Matha assumed charge for the 2026–28 term, with Sri Vedavardhana Tirtha Swamiji taking over as the pontiff-administrator.

Under the centuries-old Paryaya system, the temple is managed on a rotational basis by the Ashta Mathas—Pejavara, Puttige, Adamaru, Krishnapura, Shiroor, Sodhe, Kaniyoor and Palimaru—each for a period of two years. The system was instituted by 13th-century philosopher-saint Sri Madhwacharya, the founder of the Dvaita school of philosophy.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com