English हिन्दी
Connect with us

India News

Kapil Sibal entry triggers debate: Should a politician contest and hold SCBA presidentship?

Published

on

The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) election campaigning has hotted up with Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal entering the fray in the last moment for the President’s post. Sibal’s main contender is Pradeep Rai, SCBA Vice-President for two terms and an active Senior Advocate known for his concern for members’ cause.  Sibal, a Rajya Sabha MP from the Samajwadi Party, had filed his nomination on May 9, a mere seven days before the elections on May 16. The nomination of Sibal has triggered a debate whether a politician should contest and hold the presidentship of the SCBA. 

Justice PV Shetty, former Lokayukta, Karnataka, told India Legal: “The President-elect should not make use of the position as the office-bearer of the association to improve his position. His political will should not find place in the association’s acitivity. It should be kept separate. One is elected as the President of the SCBA and one should not use the position to improve his political status.”

Justice PV Shetty

The SCBA’s mandate is to facilitate a constructive dialogue between the Bar and the Bench, nurturing an environment conducive to the administration of justice. However, partisanship can effectively mar any such interactive effort. A politician brings with himself a baggage of not only entrenched ideologies but vested interests too. He juggles two careers and two ambitions at a time. It opens up the SCBA or any organisation to become a tool of partisan motives, turning it into an impediment rather than a facilitator of legal discourse. This has potential to erode public trust in the judiciary and compromise the sanctity of law administration and justice.

Justice Sridhar Rao, former acting chief justice of Gauhati High Court, told India Legal: “Allowing a Member of Parliament or Member of Legislative Assembly to hold senior posts in the SCBA is not tenable. The association will then have the character of a political party. It will also affect the unity of the Bar.”

Justice Sridhar Rao

Accessibility is another crucial factor that underscores the unsuitability of politicians for leadership roles within professional bodies such as the SCBA. A politician’s hectic schedule, divided between political engagements and legal pursuits, leaves little room for meaningful engagement with the grassroots members of the Bar. A leader who is inaccessible to the common man cannot truly understand their concerns and represent their interests effectively.

Prof Suryaprakash, Vice Chancellor, National Law Institute University (NLIU), Bhopal, told India Legal:  “Article 19 (i) (c) provides for freedom to form associations and unions. The SCBA has been formed not for political aggrandisement but for protection and promotion of advocates interests and rights; and to facilitate administration of justice. SCBA assists the highest court in justice delivery system, and is a part of justice delivery system. The Bar and the Bench go hand in hand. No politician should head the SCBA as it would make all political parties vie with each other to set up their own candidate and would thus make the association a political arena. Bar and Bench go hand in hand. No politician should head the SCBA. It should be headed only by legal professionals.”

Prof.(Dr.) S. Surya Prakash

Sibal was previously elected SCBA President three times, his last tenure was twenty-three years ago in 2001. Before that, he was President during the 1995-96 and 1997-98 terms. Kapil Sibal also served as the Additional Solicitor General of India during 1989–90.

Senior Advocate Pradeep Rai has over 25 years of standing at the Bar in the Supreme Court of India, various High Courts, Commissions, Regulatory Bodies and Tribunals. During his two terms as Vice-President, SCBA, Rai has taken quite a few initiative to promote the interests of the SCBA members which includes mediation programs, members housing , health benefits for members, chamber allotment and cultural programs.

Incumbent SCBA President Senior Advocate Adish Aggarwala is standing for re-election. Apart from Sibal, Rai and Aggarwala, Senior Advocate Priya Hingorani, Advocates Neeraj Srivastava and Tripurari Ray are also in the fray.

The SCBA elections will be held on May 16 . Voters will choose the President, Vice-President, Secretary, and Treasurer. A debate will be held in the Supreme Court lawns between the candidates for the posts of President and Hony Secretary on May 15. Votes will be counted on May 18, Saturday.

Continue Reading

India News

Centre revokes detention of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk after nearly six months

The central government has revoked the NSA detention of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk after nearly six months, saying the decision was taken after due consideration as Ladakh continues to witness political tensions.

Published

on

songm wangchuk

Climate activist Sonam Wangchuk, who had been detained for nearly six months under the National Security Act (NSA), will be released after the central government decided to revoke the detention order.

The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said the decision was taken after due consideration, noting that Wangchuk had already completed nearly half of the permissible detention period under the law.

In a statement, the government said the move was part of its broader effort to maintain peace and encourage dialogue in Ladakh.

According to the ministry, the government remains committed to creating an atmosphere of stability and mutual trust in the region so that constructive engagement with all stakeholders can continue.

The statement added that ongoing protests and bandhs had affected normal life and disrupted several sections of society, including students, job seekers, businesses, tour operators and tourists.

The government also reiterated its commitment to providing safeguards for Ladakh and expressed hope that regional concerns would be resolved through discussions, including through the High-Powered Committee and other dialogue mechanisms.

Detained after protests in Leh

Wangchuk was detained on September 26 last year, two days after violent protests broke out in Leh over demands for statehood and constitutional protection for Ladakh.

The clashes reportedly left four people dead and about 50 others injured, including security personnel.

Authorities detained Wangchuk under the NSA on the orders of the Leh district magistrate to maintain public order. He was later transferred to Jodhpur prison.

Long-running agitation over Ladakh safeguards

The activist has been one of the prominent voices in the movement seeking constitutional safeguards for Ladakh, particularly the inclusion of the Union Territory under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution.

Since 2023, Wangchuk has led campaigns highlighting the impact of climate change on Ladakh’s fragile ecosystem.

Last year, he undertook a 35-day fast demanding statehood and constitutional protections for the region. The protest eventually escalated into unrest, after which he called off the fast, saying his message of pursuing a peaceful path had not succeeded.

Legal challenge and court remarks

Wangchuk’s detention was challenged in the Supreme Court by his wife Gitanjali Angmo, an educator.

During the hearing, the court raised concerns about the translation of a speech cited as evidence for his detention. Judges observed that if a three-minute speech was transcribed into a seven- or eight-minute text, it could suggest possible malice.

Opposition reaction

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor welcomed the government’s decision to revoke the detention but questioned the length of time Wangchuk spent in custody.

In a post on social media platform X, Tharoor said the 169-day detention appeared excessively long and called on the Supreme Court to establish strict norms for the maximum period of detention without trial.

He also argued that indefinite detention without trial was a practice inherited from the colonial era and should not exist in a mature democracy.

Continue Reading

India News

BJP and TMC workers clash in Kolkata ahead of PM rally

Supporters of BJP and TMC clashed in central Kolkata near Girish Park shortly before Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s rally at Brigade Parade Ground.

Published

on

BJP TMC workers clash

Supporters of the Bharatiya Janata Party and the All India Trinamool Congress clashed in central Kolkata on Saturday morning ahead of a rally scheduled to be addressed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi later in the day.

The confrontation took place near Girish Park, roughly five kilometres from the Brigade Parade Ground where the prime minister is expected to address supporters.

Eyewitnesses reported that members from both political groups raised slogans and threw stones at each other during the confrontation. The clash created tension in the area as supporters were moving towards the rally venue.

According to BJP supporters, stones were allegedly thrown at them without provocation while they were heading towards the rally. One party activist told a Bengali news channel that the group was targeted suddenly and also faced verbal abuse.

However, local TMC workers rejected the allegations. They claimed that BJP supporters initiated the confrontation by hurling abuses and throwing stones first.

TMC supporters also alleged that stones were thrown towards the residence of local party leaders during the incident.

Police personnel were quickly deployed to the spot to control the situation and prevent further escalation. A large contingent of security forces intervened to restore order in the area.

The clash occurred about half an hour before the prime minister’s scheduled address at the Brigade Parade Ground. The rally marks the conclusion of the BJP’s statewide ‘Parivartan Yatra’ ahead of the upcoming assembly elections in West Bengal.

During his visit, the prime minister is also expected to unveil and lay foundation stones for development projects valued at more than Rs 18,000 crore in the state.

Continue Reading

India News

Massive fire destroys around 80 shanties in west Delhi, hundreds left homeless

A massive blaze swept through a slum cluster in west Delhi’s Matiala village, destroying around 80 shanties and leaving hundreds of migrant families homeless overnight.

Published

on

massive fire

A massive overnight fire destroyed around 80 shanties in west Delhi, leaving hundreds of migrant families homeless after flames swept through a large slum settlement near Uttam Nagar.

The incident took place late on the night of March 11 at the Machhli Mandi shanty cluster in Matiala village. The blaze spread rapidly across nearly four acres, reducing homes made of bamboo, tarpaulin and plastic sheets to ashes within hours.

According to Delhi Police, the affected families were largely migrant workers from Bihar who earn their livelihood as daily-wage labourers and ragpickers. Though no deaths were reported, residents lost most of their belongings including clothes, utensils, food supplies and documents.

Firefighters battle flames through the night

The Delhi Fire Service deployed 23 fire tenders to control the blaze. Firefighters continued operations throughout the night and managed to bring the flames under control at around 3 am on Thursday. Cooling operations continued afterward to prevent the fire from reigniting.

Thick grey ash and burnt debris covered large parts of the area after the fire. Charred bamboo frames, melted plastic sheets and twisted tin roofs were scattered across the ground.

Some residents claimed they saw unidentified people arrive on motorcycles and set several huts on fire before fleeing. Authorities have not confirmed this allegation.

Authorities cite disputed land and possible waste burning

District Magistrate Mekala Chaitanya visited the site and said the land has been under dispute for a long time.

He stated that the occupants had been issued an evacuation notice on March 7, with the night of the fire marking the final deadline to vacate the area.

An investigation is underway to determine the exact cause of the fire. The district administration suggested that the blaze may have started due to ragpickers burning waste at night, a practice commonly reported in the area.

Officials also noted that a similar fire incident had occurred earlier this month at the same location after illegal garbage dumping, which required eight fire tenders to extinguish.

Police say evacuation prevented casualties

Deputy Commissioner of Police (Dwarka) Kushal Pal Singh said police teams helped evacuate residents before the fire intensified.

He said the temporary structures were made from highly flammable materials, which allowed the fire to spread quickly. However, swift action by police and firefighters ensured that no lives were lost.

Families struggle after losing everything

Residents said they are now struggling to survive without basic necessities.

Rani Devi, a mother of three, said her family had no food, milk or drinking water after the fire destroyed their home and belongings. She added that many families were now sleeping amid the burnt debris.

A student, Rahul Kumar, whose board examinations are scheduled to begin soon, said his textbooks, notebooks and school uniform were all destroyed in the blaze.

Another resident, 42-year-old Rajesh Paswan, who migrated from Bihar over a decade ago and works as a ragpicker, said the fire wiped out everything his family owned overnight.

Demand for compensation and rehabilitation

AAP leader Ramesh Matitala met affected families and called for immediate compensation and rehabilitation.

He said the families should be provided financial assistance and relocated to a safer place, adding that authorities must ensure accountability if negligence or foul play is found in the investigation.

Continue Reading

Trending

© Copyright 2022 APNLIVE.com